At 6:57 PM +0100 1/26/10, Martin Rex wrote:
The two MUST NOTs that popped up in -03 are in violation of rfc2119 section 6!
...as are about half of all MUSTs and SHOULDs in modern IETF standards.
Did anyone of you review the new sections in the -03 draft?
Yes.
I do not think that rushing the document out of the door as-is
would be a good idea. This would set new lows for the level
of IETF Proposed Standard.
This indicates that you need to read more standards-track RFCs, then.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf