Hi Wesley, I stand red faced and corrected.
The last version I saw did not address this (I think that was either 08 or 09)
and I assumed the .10 didn't either.
I withdraw my objection and apologize for having missed this significant
rewrite!!
(coffee != sleep) & (!coffee == sleep)
Donald(_dot_)Smith(_at_)qwest(_dot_)com gcia
-----Original Message-----
From: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-MS00)[ASRC AEROSPACE CORP]
[mailto:wesley(_dot_)m(_dot_)eddy(_at_)nasa(_dot_)gov]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 4:18 PM
To: Smith, Donald; 'ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
Cc: 'tcpm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
Subject: RE: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt
(The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
Hi Donald, as the document shepherd, I need to set the record
straight on this, as your statement is simply false.
In checking that the WGLC comments had been handled in the
following document update, I looked at both the email thread
you participated in and the updated document. In this case,
the editor very clearly responded to your inputs and made
significant changes to the document.
You can find an entirely new section (9.7 Connectionless
Resets) starting in version 09 of the draft, which
specifically responds to your comments with resolutions that
were discussed on the mailing list. This section discusses
maintenance of the traffic keys across reboots which answers
your concern and makes the practice a "SHOULD" which is
stronger even than the "MAY" that you mention below.
I do not understand why you feel like your inputs were
ignored, but I hope that you'll agree that this was not the case.
________________________________________
From: tcpm-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org [tcpm-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf
Of Smith, Donald [Donald(_dot_)Smith(_at_)qwest(_dot_)com]
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 2:45 PM
To: 'ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'; 'IETF-Announce'
Cc: 'tcpm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org'
Subject: Re: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt
(The TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
I have commented numerous times that with a paragraph that
specifically provides vendors to make "connection-less resets
== attack packets" this will not get much if any use among
ISPs or other bgp speakers.
Those statements have pretty much been ignored.
I do not support this draft and believe I have wasted my time
trying to explain why to someone that is unwilling to
compromise with even a "a vendor MAY maintain state to allow
connectionless resets to work".
(coffee != sleep) & (!coffee == sleep)
Donald(_dot_)Smith(_at_)qwest(_dot_)com gcia
-----Original Message-----
From: tcpm-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
[mailto:tcpm-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On
Behalf Of The IESG
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 10:25 AM
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: tcpm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: [tcpm] Last Call: draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt (The
TCP Authentication Option) to Proposed Standard
The IESG has received a request from the TCP Maintenance and Minor
Extensions WG (tcpm) to consider the following document:
- 'The TCP Authentication Option '
<draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-opt-10.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks,
and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive
comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2010-03-10. Exceptionally,
comments may be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either
case, please
retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The file can be obtained via
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-tcpm-tcp-auth-o
pt-10.txt
IESG discussion can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=vie
w_id&dTag=16685&rfc_flag=0
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain
confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this
communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply
e-mail and destroy
all copies of the communication and any attachments.
_______________________________________________
tcpm mailing list
tcpm(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpm
This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly
prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies of the communication and any attachments.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf