I think the ISO standard is fine. Multi-letter month abbreviations are
probably OK but are a little different in different languages. Lets
stick with 2010-01-02.
Thanks,
Donald
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Scott Brim
<scott(_dot_)brim(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com> wrote:
Cullen Jennings allegedly wrote on 03/13/2010 09:51 EST:
I just got abused by someone reading the IESG web pages and pointing out
dates like 2010-01-02 , are confusing. Is there a better way to do dates
that we should be using on the ietf.org web pages?
2010-JAN-02
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf