Re: Formal SPAM Compliant filed against Anderson...

On 5/4/2010 9:30 PM, Joe Baptista wrote:
> Has anyone bother by Dean considered using filters as a means of dealing
> with this?
The problem with Filters is that you miss communications as part of the
vetting process, so you are not properly informed. From a professional
standards practice this is a serious issue.

What that means is like auditors NO email may be excluded from the
history of the vetting process lest the practice be subjected to random
and uncontrolled censorship.

Todd
> Joe
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 2:21 PM, todd glassey 
> <tglassey(_at_)earthlink(_dot_)net> wrote:
>
> > On 5/3/2010 11:06 AM, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
> > > On 05/03/2010 07:48 PM, todd glassey wrote:
> > > > Maybe Joe but I do not want to be a party to his mailing lists, and he
> > > > will not allow me off of them, so I have no choice but to file the spam
> > > > compliant.
> > > I direct your attention to the IETF's standard for unilateral list
> > > unsubscription, RFC 5228 as extended by RFC 5429.
> > Arnt
> > These are extensions for Sendmail. The problem is that Dean created a
> > list outside of the IETF and subscribed IETF members to it.  The members
> > have NO passwords and cant get them without interacting with Dean making
> > this harassment.
> >
> > As to whether the IETF postings are commercial or not they clearly are
> > since they are work on standards for commercial networking.
> >
> > Todd
> > > Dean subscribed me too, but I had forgotten about it until just now.
> > >
> > > Arnt
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ietf mailing list
> > > Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ietf mailing list
> > Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

tglassey.vcf
Description: Vcard

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf