Hi, SM. Thanks for your comments.
In reply to the stuff Barry hasn't already covered:
[mailto:ietf-bounces(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of SM
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-dkim-atps-11.txt> (DKIM Authorized
Third-Party Signers) to Experimental RFC
In Section 3:
"An Author participates in this protocol if it wishes to announce that
a message from it (in the RFC5322.From sense) should be considered
authentic as long as it bears a signature from any in a set of
It's the domain and not the author which participates in this protocol.
As a nit, the RFC 5598 term looks more like Originator instead of
The term is more based on how DKIM and ADSP use it. But you're right in that
Author Domain is the more correct term rather than Author. I'll change that
The Abstract section uses the term "authorization" whereas "authentic"
is used in the above text. Shouldn't that be "considered as
Yes, I think that's more correct as well.
Ietf mailing list