Mustapha,
You might want to wait for any other LC comments before updating.
Thanks,
Andy
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha) <
mustapha(_dot_)aissaoui(_at_)alcatel-lucent(_dot_)com> wrote:
Ooops. Thank you for pointing this out Stewart. I will make the update and
publish a new revision.
Mustapha.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Bryant [mailto:stbryant(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2012 12:48 PM
To: draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit(_at_)tools(_dot_)ietf(_dot_)org
Cc: ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org; pwe3(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt>
(Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
Authors
There was on point that I notice that you did not address from the AD
review and so I am picking it up as a LC comment:
In section 10 you say:
"This document makes the following update to the PwOperStatusTC
textual convention in RFC5542 [8]: "
This update should be recorded in the metadata (top left front page) and
it is usual to put a one line note in the abstract.
Stewart
On 07/03/2012 17:00, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from the Pseudowire Emulation Edge to
Edge WG (pwe3) to consider the following document:
- 'Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit'
<draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> as a Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org mailing lists by 2012-03-21. Exceptionally,
comments may
be sent to iesg(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org instead. In either case, please retain
the
beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
Abstract
This document describes a mechanism for standby status signaling of
redundant pseudowires (PWs) between their termination points. A set
of redundant PWs is configured between provider edge (PE) nodes in
single-segment pseudowire (SS-PW) applications, or between
terminating provider edge (T-PE) nodes in multi-segment pseudowire
(MS-PW) applications.
In order for the PE/T-PE nodes to indicate the preferred PW to use
for forwarding PW packets to one another, a new status bit is needed
to indicate a preferential forwarding status of Active or Standby for
each PW in a redundant set.
In addition, a second status bit is defined to allow peer PE nodes to
coordinate a switchover operation of the PW.
The file can be obtained via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/
IESG discussion can be tracked via
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit/ballot/
No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
--
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
_______________________________________________
pwe3 mailing list
pwe3(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf