IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2014
- RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel, 15:17
- Mail System Reliability [was: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header], Hector Santos, 12:47
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve), 10:30
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin, 07:48
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin, 07:41
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Michael Richardson, 07:41
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos, 06:58
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Cridland, 02:36
March 30, 2014
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin, 22:32
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Mukom Akong T., 21:55
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Crocker, 21:16
- Re[2]: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, mohammed serrhini, 20:50
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine, 20:17
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine, 20:08
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon, 19:38
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush, 18:52
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush, 18:44
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin, 17:44
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:32
- Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), John C Klensin, 15:42
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin, 13:09
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine, 10:15
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:56
March 29, 2014
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Black, David, 21:25
- RE: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Christian Huitema, 20:02
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos, 13:13
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos, 13:11
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dick Franks, 12:21
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine, 12:16
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon, 12:04
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, David Morris, 12:04
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos, 11:49
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos, 11:48
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Scott Brim, 11:44
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Crocker, 11:18
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dale R. Worley, 11:03
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine, 09:59
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, David Morris, 09:58
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Aronson, 09:39
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon, 07:37
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Eliot Lear, 04:51
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Cridland, 04:33
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush, 03:45
- SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Kevin M. Gallagher, 01:59
March 27, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), Ted Lemon, 19:53
- Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), John Leslie, 19:00
- Re: Saying no, joel jaeggli, 18:46
- Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), Andrew Sullivan, 18:42
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, John Leslie, 18:34
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush, 17:57
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick, 17:55
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, joel jaeggli, 17:13
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick, 17:03
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Yaacov Weingarten, 12:26
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, George, Wes, 10:36
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, l.wood, 05:39
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-special-purpose-labels-05, Jari Arkko, 02:14
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-13, Peter Yee, 01:07
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-fairhurst-ipdvb-ule-iana-06, Peter Yee, 00:59
March 26, 2014
- Re: RFC 5280/6818 - X.509v3 Name Constraints Inconsistency(?), Russ Housley, 20:33
- RFC 5280/6818 - X.509v3 Name Constraints Inconsistency(?), Vyron Tsingaras, 15:52
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel, 15:34
- Call for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations, IAB Chair, 10:30
- Re: NTIA & IANA, Eliot Lear, 02:11
March 24, 2014
- Re: two videos on WebRTC and security efforts, Hector Santos, 16:06
- two videos on WebRTC and security efforts, IETF Chair, 14:03
- Liaison Statement Improvements SOW for Community Input, IETF Administrative Director, 13:35
- Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 10:10
- Fwd: ICANN NomCom and ICANN Leadership Positions, Russ Mundy, 10:04
- Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 10:02
- Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 07:35
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 02:08
- Re: NTIA & IANA, IAB Chair, 01:54
- Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Abdussalam Baryun, 01:39
March 23, 2014
- Re: =?UTF-8?B?IElBT0MgU2Vla3MgQ29tbXVuaXR5IElucHV0IG9uIElFVEYgV2Vic2l0ZSBS?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXZhbXAgU09X?=, Michael Richardson, 19:07
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 15:24
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, David Morris, 12:59
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Rich Kulawiec, 11:05
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Rich Kulawiec, 09:24
- US Presidential Innovations Fellow Round 3 Launch, Abdussalam Baryun, 09:10
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 08:57
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Abdussalam Baryun, 08:51
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 05:23
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Randy Bush, 05:02
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 04:44
March 22, 2014
- IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, mohammed serrhini, 18:45
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Dale R. Worley, 18:05
- RE: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Adrian Farrel, 15:37
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Randy Bush, 13:36
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 11:24
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Rich Kulawiec, 10:26
March 21, 2014
- Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-08, Black, David, 10:49
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 10:36
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 10:34
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Stewart Bryant, 09:00
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Thomas Narten, 07:19
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Stewart Bryant, 07:10
- Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Thomas Narten, 06:46
- RE: IETF working language, Fatai Zhang, 03:51
- Re: IETF working language, Yoav Nir, 00:39
March 20, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re[2]: IETF working language, mohammed serrhini, 20:28
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-11, Ben Campbell, 17:42
- RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Adrian Farrel, 16:47
- Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Robert Sparks, 16:35
- IETF Meeting Hotels Published Online, IETF Administrative Director, 16:08
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, David Morris, 15:22
- Re: IETF working language, Fred Baker (fred), 15:10
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Robert Sparks, 13:29
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 12:34
- Comcast & NBCUniversal Make Long-Term Commitment to the IETF, IETF Administrative Director, 11:35
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt> (Reservation of Last Autonomous System (AS) Numbers) to Informational RFC, David Farmer, 10:55
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 08:09
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Scott Brim, 07:57
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Frank Solensky, 07:46
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Scott Brim, 07:02
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 06:43
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 06:42
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Yoav Nir, 05:20
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, t.p., 05:12
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, t.p., 05:12
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Avri Doria, 05:09
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:07
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Abdussalam Baryun, 03:40
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 02:38
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 02:28
March 19, 2014
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Michael StJohns, 20:44
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Dale R. Worley, 18:20
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Dale R. Worley, 18:19
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Dale R. Worley, 18:18
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Ofer Inbar, 17:45
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Hector Santos, 17:36
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, David Morris, 16:39
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Dale R. Worley, 16:33
- RE: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Adrian Farrel, 15:49
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Pete Resnick, 15:29
- Re: IETF working language, Dale R. Worley, 15:16
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Dale R. Worley, 15:11
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Dale R. Worley, 15:10
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 14:41
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Dale R. Worley, 14:25
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Michael StJohns, 13:00
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 12:55
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, John G. Scudder, 12:37
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Pete Resnick, 11:10
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Kathleen Moriarty, 09:51
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 03:14
- AUTO: Ahmed Bakhat Masood is out of the office. (returning 03/28/2014), Ahmed Bakhat Masood, 00:11
March 18, 2014
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Henning G Schulzrinne, 22:43
- RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, l.wood, 22:16
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Michael StJohns, 22:06
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, John Levine, 22:04
- it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Tony Hansen, 20:44
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Spencer Dawkins, 20:40
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Scott Brim, 19:54
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Stephen Farrell, 19:16
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Stephen Farrell, 19:05
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Scott Brim, 19:04
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Pete Resnick, 18:55
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Stephen Farrell, 18:11
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Pete Resnick, 18:01
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, t.p., 12:48
- Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01 - A mostly 'NO' view, Michael StJohns, 11:54
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Avri Doria, 11:52
- RE: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Adrian Farrel, 03:57
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Brian E Carpenter, 02:33
March 17, 2014
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, joel jaeggli, 22:06
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Pete Resnick, 19:32
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Scott Brim, 19:31
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Pete Resnick, 19:20
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Dave Crocker, 19:18
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Scott Brim, 19:07
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Stephen Farrell, 18:44
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Martin Rex, 18:40
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Spencer Dawkins, 17:13
- Re: buggy mail software, was Web Anniversary, tytso, 17:02
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 16:58
- ISOC Fellowship to the IETF 90 (Toronto, Canada), Steve Conte, 16:45
- IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Abdussalam Baryun, 16:03
- Re: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Mary Barnes, 15:34
- RE: Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Adrian Farrel, 15:03
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Scott Brim, 14:58
- Re: buggy mail software, was Web Anniversary, Ofer Inbar, 13:52
- Comments on draft-farrresnickel-harassment-01, Mary Barnes, 12:59
- Re: [IAOC] IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Randy Bush, 12:18
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon, 11:58
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eric Burger, 11:12
- Re: buggy mail software, was Web Anniversary, John Levine, 11:09
- Re: Web Anniversary, Gregg L. DesElms, 10:13
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, David Morris, 09:07
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:40
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 06:17
- Re: Web Anniversary, Francesco Fondelli, 03:12
- RE: Social Science and the IETF, l.wood, 00:14
March 16, 2014
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Dave Crocker, 22:14
- Fwd: Re[2]: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, mohammed serrhini, 20:39
- Re: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, joel jaeggli, 13:28
- Re: Web Anniversary, John Scudder, 09:58
- Re: Web Anniversary, Noel Chiappa, 09:43
- Re: Web Anniversary, Lou Berger, 09:08
- RE: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, l.wood, 05:03
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 02:48
March 15, 2014
- Re: Web Anniversary, Geoff Mulligan, 22:26
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Randy Bush, 15:34
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 11:23
- Re: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, t.p., 07:50
- RE: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, l.wood, 07:09
- RE: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, l.wood, 07:05
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 06:17
- Re: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, John C Klensin, 04:25
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Hector Santos, 01:05
March 14, 2014
- Re: Web Anniversary, Bob Hinden, 21:27
- Re: Web Anniversary, Ted Lemon, 19:52
- Re: Web Anniversary, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 19:33
- Re: Web Anniversary, Scott Brim, 18:13
- NTIA & IANA, IETF Chair, 17:16
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, David Morris, 16:57
- Re: Web Anniversary, Dave Crocker, 16:43
- Re: Web Anniversary, Dave Crocker, 16:38
- Re: Web Anniversary, Robert Kahn, 16:28
- Re: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, Douglas Otis, 16:04
- Re: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Michael StJohns, 15:49
- Re: quaint old computers, was "Archived-At" headers, John Levine, 15:44
- Re: Web Anniversary, Bob Braden, 15:31
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 15:24
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Brian E Carpenter, 15:18
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, t.p., 12:04
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars, 11:29
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, John Levine, 10:23
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Eggert, Lars, 09:10
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:02
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, t.p., 07:25
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 02:40
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, "Martin J. Dürst", 00:06
March 13, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Robert Sparks, 16:38
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-p2mp-pw-requirements-07.txt> (Requirements and Framework for Point-to-Multipoint Pseudowires over MPLS PSNs) to Informational RFC, Adrian Farrel, 11:50
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Pindar Wong, 10:52
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Pindar Wong, 10:51
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Pindar Wong, 10:51
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Jefsey, 10:49
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Melinda Shore, 09:55
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Loa Andersson, 09:52
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 09:50
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Melinda Shore, 09:37
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Loa Andersson, 08:16
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:22
- Re: Web Anniversary, Tim Chown, 05:38
- Re: Web Anniversary, Tim Chown, 05:37
- Re: Web Anniversary, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 05:06
- Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:00
- Re: Web Anniversary, Jaap Akkerhuis, 04:49
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Brian E Carpenter, 04:01
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Brian E Carpenter, 03:36
- RE: Web Anniversary, l.wood, 02:39
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Eliot Lear, 01:35
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Patrik Fältström, 00:41
- Re: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Geoff Huston, 00:24
March 12, 2014
- Re: Web Anniversary, Ole Jacobsen, 20:07
- Re: Web Anniversary, Robert Elz, 19:40
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Eric Burger, 18:42
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, George Michaelson, 18:18
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Michael Richardson, 17:44
- Re: Web Anniversary, Francesco Fondelli, 17:26
- RE: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, l.wood, 17:03
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Jari Arkko, 16:44
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Eliot Lear, 16:14
- Re: [Internetgovtech] Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Steve Crocker, 15:56
- Re: IETF Website Revamp SOW; Suggestion, Michael Richardson, 15:53
- Re: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Geoff Huston, 15:51
- Re: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Steve Crocker, 15:08
- Re: Guiding the Evolution of the IANA Protocol Parameter Registries, Geoff Huston, 14:52
- RE: Web Anniversary, Christian Huitema, 14:29
- Re: Web Anniversary, Jaap Akkerhuis, 14:16
- Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Riccardo Bernardini, 14:04
- Re: Web Anniversary, Noel Chiappa, 13:55
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 13:38
- Re: Web Anniversary, Jaap Akkerhuis, 13:37
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, ned+ietf, 13:37
- Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:30
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 13:24
- Re: Web Anniversary, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 13:05
- Re: Web Anniversary, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 12:56
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, ned+ietf, 12:51
- Re: Web Anniversary, John C Klensin, 12:36
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE, 12:23
- Re: [eX-bulk] : Re: IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE, 12:22
- Re: [eX-bulk] : IETF working language, Christopher LILJENSTOLPE, 12:22
- Re: Web Anniversary, Ofer Inbar, 12:06
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, John Levine, 11:50
- Re: Web Anniversary, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond, 10:40
- Re: Web Anniversary, Michael StJohns, 10:35
- Re: Web Anniversary, Ole Jacobsen, 10:00
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 09:37
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Loa Andersson, 09:00
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Juliao Braga, 08:39
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, John C Klensin, 08:37
- Re: Web Anniversary, Huub van Helvoort, 08:29
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ofer Inbar, 08:11
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Stephen Farrell, 07:32
- IETF Website Revamp SOW; Suggestion, Juliao Braga, 06:06
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Jelte Jansen, 05:09
- Web Anniversary, IETF Chair, 01:20
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Joe Hildebrand, 01:16
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ray Pelletier, 00:46
March 11, 2014
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Douglas Otis, 20:11
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 19:45
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Thomas Heide Clausen, 19:13
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Daniel Karrenberg, 17:42
- Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Juliao Braga, 17:15
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:57
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Solarus, 16:34
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:29
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Dave Cridland, 16:13
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:56
- IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, IETF Administrative Director, 13:43
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 13:33
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, joel jaeggli, 13:12
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, ned+ietf, 13:11
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, t.p., 13:10
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, t.p., 13:09
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Chaitanya Dhareshwar, 13:07
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 12:38
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 12:33
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, ned+ietf, 12:32
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Martin Thomson, 12:23
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, joel jaeggli, 12:21
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 12:12
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, joel jaeggli, 12:08
- Re: [89all] IETF-89 summary article, Coppens Pasteur NDAYIRAGIJE, 12:07
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 11:55
- Nominations Sought for 2014 Jonathan B. Postel Service Award, IETF Administrative Director, 11:16
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Riccardo Bernardini, 11:06
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 10:49
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, t.p., 09:58
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 09:42
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Abdussalam Baryun, 04:48
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Stewart Bryant, 04:35
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Dave Crocker, 03:44
March 10, 2014
- RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Eric Gray, 12:40
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:44
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Randy Bush, 11:43
- RE: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Russ White, 11:26
- IETF-89 summary article, IETF Chair, 11:19
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Jari Arkko, 10:56
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Joe Touch, 10:48
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Robert Sparks, 09:30
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 08:30
- Re: Stopping at two, Juliao Braga, 08:27
- RE: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), l.wood, 08:05
- Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Riccardo Bernardini, 08:05
- Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 08:04
- Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Yoav Nir, 07:56
- Re: Russia, Ukraine and ITU, Dave Cridland, 07:24
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 07:18
- Re: Russia, Ukraine and ITU, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 07:15
- Re: Russia, Ukraine and ITU, Dave Cridland, 07:02
- Russia, Ukraine and ITU, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 06:44
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Scott Brim, 06:14
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood, 06:11
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 05:48
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood, 05:20
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Dick Franks, 05:02
- Re: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Jelte Jansen, 04:35
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Måns Nilsson, 04:16
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood, 02:20
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, l.wood, 02:17
- RE: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Christian Huitema, 01:15
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Christer Holmberg, 01:04
- RE: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Russ White, 00:38
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, joel jaeggli, 00:22
March 09, 2014
- Re: Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Chaitanya Dhareshwar, 22:41
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Kathleen Moriarty, 21:58
- Re: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Scott Brim, 21:36
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Narelle, 21:28
- Stopping at two (was: Two official work languages is smarter), Andrew Sullivan, 21:13
- Re: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Andrew Sullivan, 21:03
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Joel M. Halpern, 20:50
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 19:51
- Re: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Donald Eastlake, 19:23
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Joel M. Halpern, 19:13
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 19:07
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Joel M. Halpern, 18:45
- RE: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Eric Gray, 18:42
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Michael Richardson, 18:34
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Spencer Dawkins, 18:29
- Re: IETF working language, Dave Cridland, 18:21
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, John R Levine, 17:47
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 17:32
- Re: IETF working language, Brian Trammell, 17:23
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Arturo Servin, 17:18
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 17:14
- Re: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Brian Trammell, 17:08
- Re: IETF working language, Arturo Servin, 17:07
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Gordon Lennox, 17:03
- RE: Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Eric Gray, 17:02
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, Ted Lemon, 16:58
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Scott Brim, 16:56
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 16:50
- Overlays and encapsulations (was Re: Engineering discussions ), Alia Atlas, 16:34
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, t.p., 16:30
- Re: Engineering discussions (was Re: a radical idea), heasley, 16:29
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Juliao Braga, 16:27
- Re: IETF working language, Arturo Servin, 16:16
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Jelte Jansen, 15:54
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Gordon Lennox, 15:27
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, John C Klensin, 15:25
- Re: IETF working language, Harald Alvestrand, 14:58
- Re: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Patrik Fältström, 14:57
- RE: IETF working language, Adrian Farrel, 14:54
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Harald Alvestrand, 14:46
- RE: Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Adrian Farrel, 14:46
- Removing stuff from archives (Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version), Harald Alvestrand, 14:41
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Stewart Bryant (stbryant), 14:35
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Gordon Lennox, 14:30
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:46
- Re: how do we make the IETF working language work?, John Levine, 13:32
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Russ Housley, 13:10
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 13:08
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 13:05
- Re: IETF working language, Stewart Bryant (stbryant), 13:05
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Abdussalam Baryun, 12:29
- Re: IETF working language, Andrew Newton, 12:20
- Re: Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Russ Housley, 12:18
- Two official work languages is smarter (was Re: IETF working language, Abdussalam Baryun, 11:38
- Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 09:55
- Re: IETF working language, Ted Lemon, 09:48
- Re: IETF working language, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:46
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 08:28
- Re: IETF working language, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:18
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Loa Andersson, 08:14
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 07:40
- Re: a radical idea, Melinda Shore, 06:54
- Re: a radical idea, Scott Brim, 06:48
- Engineering discussions (was Re: a radical idea), Dave Crocker, 06:11
- Re: a radical idea, Melinda Shore, 06:09
- Re: a radical idea, Dave Crocker, 06:02
- Re: a radical idea, Mark Nottingham, 05:47
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 05:17
- Re: IETF working language, Dave Cridland, 04:44
- RE: a radical idea, l.wood, 03:58
- Re: IETF working language, Jari Arkko, 03:55
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 03:54
- a radical idea, Randy Bush, 03:50
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 03:47
- Re: IETF working language, Patrik Fältström, 03:35
- Re: IETF working language, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 03:16
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Patrik Fältström, 03:06
March 08, 2014
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 21:11
- Re[2]: IETF working language, mohammed serrhini, 19:02
- RE: IETF working language, l.wood, 15:58
- Re: IETF working language, Klaas Wierenga (kwiereng), 14:13
- Re: IETF working language, Scott Brim, 13:56
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Scott Brim, 13:50
- Re: IETF working language, Juliao Braga, 13:05
- Re: IETF working language, Chaitanya Dhareshwar, 12:35
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Brian E Carpenter, 11:36
- Re: IETF working language, Guillaume Leclanche, 10:33
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Henrik Levkowetz, 09:47
- Re: IETF working language, Brian E Carpenter, 09:25
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 09:22
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Brian E Carpenter, 09:08
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Randy Bush, 08:50
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Henrik Levkowetz, 08:44
- Re: IETF working language, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 08:30
- IETF working language, l.wood, 08:18
- RE: Social Science and the IETF, l.wood, 07:54
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, l.wood, 07:44
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Pete Resnick, 06:57
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Loa Andersson, 06:42
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Loa Andersson, 06:29
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Adrian Farrel, 06:03
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:26
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:17
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Adrian Farrel, 04:24
- Re: Social Science and the IETF, George Michaelson, 03:59
- Social Science and the IETF, Stewart Bryant, 03:50
March 07, 2014
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, David Morris, 21:23
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Eric Burger, 18:41
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Randy Bush, 18:34
- US Presidential Innovations Fellow Round 3 Launch, Geoff Mulligan, 16:34
- weekly posting summary for 89attendees, Thomas Narten, 16:16
- Re: "Archived-At" headers, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 16:03
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Randy Presuhn, 14:45
- "Archived-At" headers, Dale R. Worley, 14:41
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Bjoern Hoehrmann, 13:32
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09.txt> (XML Media Types) to Proposed Standard, t.p., 12:10
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Dave Crocker, 12:03
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Randy Bush, 12:00
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, VIGOUREUX, MARTIN (MARTIN), 11:56
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Pete Resnick, 11:54
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09.txt> (XML Media Types) to Proposed Standard, t.p., 11:53
- Re: Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, t.p., 11:53
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Adrian Farrel, 11:36
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Ted Lemon, 11:10
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Dave Crocker, 10:37
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Jari Arkko, 10:27
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Jari Arkko, 10:27
- Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 10:15
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Randy Bush, 09:58
- [89all] Friday network schedule, John Levine, 03:51
March 06, 2014
- Weekly posting summary for ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org, Thomas Narten, 23:53
- RE: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), l.wood, 17:54
- Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 15:14
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 13:31
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), IETF Chair, 12:47
- Re: Proposed Standard requirements, S Moonesamy, 12:29
- Re: Proposed Standard requirements, ned+ietf, 12:28
- Re: Proposed Standard requirements, Brian E Carpenter, 11:29
- Proposed Standard requirements, Dave Cridland, 11:11
- Top Ten Things video erratum (was Re: Scribes and whatnot), Ofer Inbar, 10:47
- Re: Scribes and whatnot, Kathleen Moriarty, 10:34
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Brian E Carpenter, 10:24
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Scott Brim, 10:20
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, CJ Aronson, 10:14
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Thomas Narten, 09:59
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Jari Arkko, 09:54
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Janet P Gunn, 09:34
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Andrew Sullivan, 09:13
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Brian E Carpenter, 08:56
- mythbusters try cat-herding: Savage Purr-suation, =JeffH, 08:18
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Geoff Huston, 08:12
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Eliot Lear, 07:41
- Re: Scribes and whatnot, Suzanne Woolf, 07:13
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Tim Bray, 07:02
- Scribes and whatnot, Melinda Shore, 06:56
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Ted Lemon, 06:38
- Re: 10 Commandments of Logic & 10 of Teaching (was Re: Ad hominems), Andrea Glorioso, 06:22
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, John Levine, 05:19
- RE: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Leaf Yeh, 05:04
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Ted Lemon, 05:03
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Murray S. Kucherawy, 04:13
- Re: A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Dave Crocker, 03:40
- Fyi: : [DNSOP] Agenda - Additional DNSOP meeting on DNS Privacy, Thursday 1840-1940, Sovereign, joel jaeggli, 03:09
March 05, 2014
- A suggestion for future Technical Plenaries, Ross Finlayson, 20:32
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Måns Nilsson, 17:59
- ICANN NomCom and ICANN Leadership Positions, Russ Mundy, 14:17
- Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Abdussalam Baryun, 13:37
- Re: Ad hominems, Dave Crocker, 12:25
- Re: Ad hominems, Stewart Bryant, 12:18
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), Randy Bush, 11:44
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Tom Taylor, 11:24
- Re: AB's comments on April Fools RFCs (was Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide"), George, Wes, 10:27
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Spencer Dawkins, 10:17
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Jari Arkko, 08:21
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, James Polk, 04:17
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Barry Leiba, 04:01
- 10 Commandments of Logic & 10 of Teaching (was Re: Ad hominems), Dave Crocker, 03:39
- RE: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", l.wood, 03:09
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:06
- Re: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Murray S. Kucherawy, 01:54
- RE: Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, l.wood, 00:11
March 04, 2014
- Some Comments for Tutorial slides presented in IETF 89, Abdussalam Baryun, 23:52
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", SM, 23:34
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Abdussalam Baryun, 22:16
- RE: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", l.wood, 22:11
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Abdussalam Baryun, 20:45
- Re: [rfc-i] Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Tony Hansen, 19:29
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Joe Touch, 17:49
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", John Levine, 17:32
- Re[2]: Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", mohammed serrhini, 12:13
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", George, Wes, 12:01
- Workshop on Web payments 28 March, Rigo Wenning, 11:41
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xml-mediatypes-09.txt> (XML Media Types) to Proposed Standard, Paul Grosso, 11:40
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", Abdussalam Baryun, 11:16
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", Ted Lemon, 09:35
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", Riccardo Bernardini, 09:31
- Re: Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", Fred Baker (fred), 09:07
- Call for Review of draft-iab-styleguide-01.txt, "RFC Style Guide", IAB Chair, 08:42
- Call for Review of draft-iab-doi-01.txt, "Assigning Digital Object Identifiers to RFCs", IAB Chair, 08:38
- Call for Review of draft-iab-host-firewalls-02.txt, "Reflections On Host Firewalls", IAB Chair, 08:32
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Jari Arkko, 06:10
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 05:35
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Abdussalam Baryun, 05:34
- RE: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Adrian Farrel, 05:29
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Bjoern Hoehrmann, 05:26
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Brian E Carpenter, 04:42
- Re: Anti-harassment policy and ombudsperson, IETF Chair, 04:09
March 03, 2014
- Re: Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Jari Arkko, 12:57
- Anti-harassment procedures - next version, Pete Resnick, 12:28
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Dave Crocker, 12:02
- Re: Plenary audio? Re: [89attendees] [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Janet P Gunn, 11:57
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Bob Braden, 11:51
- RE: Plenary audio? Re: [89attendees] [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Adrian Farrel, 11:08
- Plenary audio? Re: [89attendees] [89all] Welcome to IETF-89, Janet P Gunn, 11:05
- Re: Clarifying IETF process [Was: A private club], Phillip Hallam-Baker, 03:54
March 02, 2014
- RE: We're officially a cabal, l.wood, 15:59
- RE: We're officially a cabal, l.wood, 15:56
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Dale R. Worley, 11:41
- Re: [89all] IETF 89 - Meeting Venue Information, Robert Moskowitz, 10:05
- Re: Last Call: RFC 796 (Address Mappings) to Historic, Ralph Droms, 05:29
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Dave Crocker, 04:06
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Brian E Carpenter, 04:00
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Dave Crocker, 03:56
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Spencer Dawkins, 03:46
March 01, 2014
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Phillip Hallam-Baker, 16:21
- IAOC appointment by the IESG, IETF Chair, 13:16
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Warren Kumari, 11:16
- Re: We're officially a cabal, Ted Lemon, 11:06
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Douglas Otis, 06:45
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), John C Klensin, 05:43
- Re: Ad hominems (was: Policy of WG chairs in organising time for presentations and face2face discussions), Barry Leiba, 05:28
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-fairhurst-ipdvb-ule-iana-05, Peter Yee, 01:38