Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists

How about ietf-smtp?  It already exists and isn't very busy.

Just sent you the formal request for a non-WG mailing list, so as Ned
suggests (and I agree) the discussion can be separate.

-MSK

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, (continued) Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Pete Resnick Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Pete Resnick Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Pete Resnick Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, ned+ietf Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Miles Fidelman Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, ned+ietf Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine <= Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Douglas Otis Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Michael Richardson Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Theodore Ts'o