ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Substantial nomcom procedure updates (Was: Re: Consolidating BCP 10 (Operation of the NomCom))

2014-09-16 11:57:46
At 12:40 PM 9/16/2014, Stewart Bryant wrote:
The worst case, which is not a fantasy, is that 5 large companies encourage
their staff to volunteer, so we end up with 5 pairs of large-company
staff and nobody from the rest of the community. But (as Mike seems to
imply) if we put in rules to make this impossible, we'd be even further
from "each eligible volunteer is equally likely to be selected."
So this does need clarity of intent, one way or the other.

   Brian
It would be useful to run the stats to see how close we have ever come to 
that. The affiliations are not on the site so it's difficult to do a quick 
check. My recollection is that we have never seen worse than 2+2, and that 
does not happen every year.


What I remember (without going back and checking) is something like 2+2+1 or 
2+2+1+1 happening multiple times.  What might actually be more interesting is 
looking at say the last 15 years  or so of Nomcom membership and understanding 
what the long term trend of representation is.  Unfortunately, we don't seem to 
have that information all in one place. 

Mike




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>