ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Status of RFC 20 (was: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09)

2014-12-06 17:38:09
On 6 December 2014 at 22:49, <l(_dot_)wood(_at_)surrey(_dot_)ac(_dot_)uk> wrote:

Security pedants might wonder why there is no easy way to authenticate
electronic copies of RFCs, given the vast array of security-related
protocols that the IETF has defined. How can I check the integrity of an
RFC document and that it hasn't been tampered with? I imagine an MD5sum
just won't do.


All the copies I'm reading are properly signed, according to RFC 4637. If
yours aren't, maybe they *have* been tampered with.

Dave.
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>