Earl, you said :
$NUMFOLUP$ is based on *explicit* follow-ups. From the docs.
Doc is real clear. I got confused because of achives I read which put me under
the impression you found a get around. My mistake !
I am unclear on what you are stating. Provide a snippet of an example
in index
Let me put it in other word: sometimes MHonArc misses the subject-based
threading and I can't find the reason why. A couple of examples follow but I
must confess my analysis does not bring the solution: For some failing thread
configurations I have other situation where they work.
Three failing examples :
I- Herebelow, MHonArc missed that 3 is a reply to 1
1- Chaîne d'Info (Active Channel), Christian de la Salle - 24/07/98
2- Mise en place d'archives, Christian de la Salle - 07/08/98
3- Re : Chaîne d'Info (Active Channel), Christian de la Salle - 23/08/98
Notes: Both have the same author but I don't believe it's taken into account
by MHonArc (it worked in other occurences). They feature special characters
(accents) and when I look at the mbx file they are not encoded :
Subject: Chaîne d'Info (Active Channel)
Subject: Re : Chaîne d'Info (Active Channel)
II- Herebelow, MHonArc missed that 4 is a reply to 2
1- Mailing lists, Christian de la Salle - 23/06/98
2- Securité / Stats, Christian de la Salle - 02/07/98
3- Majordomo : archives, Christian de la Salle - 23/07/98
4- Re: Securité / Stats, Christian de la Salle - 23/07/98
5- Redirect Problem and Majordomo Archiving Question, Christian de la
Salle - 28/07/98
Notes / Same author too. They feature special characters (accents) and when I
look at the mbx file they are both encoded the same way
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Tr:_Securit=E9_/_Stats?=
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Securit=E9_/_Stats?=
and Tr: is coded as a subject Reply Expression which works OK in other
messages:
<SUBJECTREPLYRXP>
^\s*(tr|re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*
</SUBJECTREPLYRXP>
III- Herebelow, MHonArc missed that 3 is a reply to 1
1- Bonjour à tous!, Pierre / JP Derrier - 02/09/98
2- un humble avis sur les questions-réponses, Anne GUILLIEN - 03/09/98
3- Re: Bonjour à tous!, Christian de la Salle - 03/09/98
Notes: Different authors. They feature special characters (accents) and when I
look at the mbx file they are encoded a different way
Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bonjour_=E0_tous!?=
Subject: Re: Bonjour à tous!
Onthe other hand the following examples work OK:
I- Herebelow, MHonArc found that 3 is a reply to 2
1- afa, Support Technique - 02/03/98
2- Accès Magic On Line, Christian de la Salle - 13/03/98
3- Re: Accès Magic On Line, Arnaud Pignard - 13/03/98
Notes: Different authors. They feature special characters
(accents) and when I look at the mbx file they are not encoded :
Subject: Accès Magic On Line
Subject: Re: Accès Magic On Line
II- Herebelow, MHonArc found that 4 and 5 are replies to 1
1- Actions prévues, Christian de la Salle - 07/09/98
2- HELP ! (www.afa.asso.fr), Christian de la Salle - 09/09/98
3- AFA - Thx, Christian de la Salle - 09/09/98
4- Tr: Actions prévues, Christian de la Salle - 17/09/98
5- Re: Tr: Actions prévues, Christian de la Salle - 17/09/98
Notes: Same author. They feature special characters
(accents) and when I look at the mbx file they are not encoded :
Subject: Actions prévues
Subject: Tr: Actions prévues
Subject: Re: Tr: Actions prévues
Thanks, Christian
