procmail
[Top] [All Lists]

Hmm..

1997-08-02 10:05:00
Run into a slight bug when trying to set up an addition to
spambouncer...

procmail: Executing " ($FORMAIL -r \
    -A"X-Loop: ${NOLOOP}";\
    cat $SBDIR/bouncer;\
    cat spamtemp;\
    rm -f spamtemp) \
    >/home/dhill/SPAM"
procmail: Assigning "LASTFOLDER= ($FORMAIL -r \
    -A"X-Loop: ${NOLOOP}";\
    cat $SBDIR/bouncer;\
    cat spamtemp;\
    rm -f spamtemp) \
    >/home/dhill/SPAM"
procmail: Unlocking "spamtemp.lock"
From listproc-errors(_at_)arvidsjaur(_dot_)anu(_dot_)edu(_dot_)au  Sat Aug  2 
11:57:51 1997
 Subject: Get Rich NOW!!
  Folder:  ($FORMAIL -r \     -A"X-Loop: ${NOLOOP}";\     cat
$SBDIR/bo    5087
procmail: Notified comsat: "dhill@: ($FORMAIL -r \
    -A"X-Loop: ${NOLOOP}";\

Why such a strange folder? Here's the recipie.
  :0
  * ^Subject: Get Rich NOW!!
{
:0 c:
| $FORMAIL -A"X-SpamBouncer: Spam" >>$SPAMFOLDER

:0 c:
spamtemp

:0: spamtemp.lock
| ($FORMAIL -r \
    -A"X-Loop: ${NOLOOP}";\
    cat $SBDIR/bouncer;\
    cat spamtemp;\
    rm -f spamtemp) \
    >/home/dhill/SPAM
}

The /home/dhill/SPA<M will change to sendmail when its working
properly.  Oh yes, if this recipie catchjes mail sent to a list, will
the reply go to the list or to the sender? (seeing that lists do a
resent, I think it;'d be the sender, but not sure.)

Any clues?

---

Duncan Hill
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cogito ergo sum 
Email: dhill(_at_)sunbeach(_dot_)net  :  dhill(_at_)bajan(_dot_)org  
http://www.bajan.org  :  http://www.cropover.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>