On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Professional Software Engineering wrote:
I don't understand what you're arguing about, or who with.
Sean, I'm not sure I do either.
I think I'm going to bow out of this thread, even though I started it. I
understand what you are saying about degrees of spammishness; but to me it
just doesn't make a lot of (practical) sense.
My arguments are weak; primarily because I have insufficient numbers/data
to back them up. Sooooo - I'm about to embark on a project to collect
those numbers. Each of my recipes will be incrementing a counter. I'll
let the counters collect data for six months, then review publicly.
False positives should be the only thing I have to account for manually.
All messages will go through all recipes and spam hits will be commented
in the message.
Maybe I'll write a paper! :)
Thank you for your comments and conversation. Also thanks to Dallman,
LuKreme, Don, Tony, and others for their insight and comments. Will talk
to you all later (on a different subject!).
- fleet -
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail