Procmail (date)
February 28, 2003
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Steve Huntsberry, 15:57
- Re: [2] Newbie From Question (Regex), Thomas Beer, 15:38
- Re: Procmail and EXIM, Gerald V. Livingston II, 15:31
- Re: [2] Newbie From Question (Regex), Patrick Shanahan, 15:21
- Re: [2] Newbie From Question (Regex), Thomas Beer, 15:13
- Procmail and EXIM, poff, 14:52
- Re[2]: automatic PHP script ?, poff, 14:29
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Don Hammond, 14:22
- Re: procmail, cyrus and ":0 c", LuKreme, 14:15
- RE: filtering admin.incoming with spambouncer - another newbiequestion, Tom Wolfe, 14:11
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Don Hammond, 13:35
- Re: Newbie From Question (Regex), David W. Tamkin, 13:29
- Re: Newbie From Question (Regex), Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:09
- Re[2]: automatic PHP script ?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:59
- Re: Newbie From Question (Regex), Thomas Beer, 12:46
- filtering admin.incoming with spambouncer - another newbie question, Tom Wolfe, 12:05
- Re[2]: automatic PHP script ?, poff, 12:05
- Re[2]: automatic PHP script ?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:49
- Re: procmail, cyrus and ":0 c", Andrew Kelley, 10:01
- Re: Newbie From Question (correction), David W. Tamkin, 10:01
- Re: Newbie From Question (Regex), David W. Tamkin, 08:02
- Re[2]: automatic PHP script ?, Toph Kemmann, 08:02
- Newbie From Question (Regex), Jeff Orrok, 05:42
- Re: Newbie From Question (Regex), Dallman Ross, 05:42
- Newbie From Question (Regex), Tom Beer, 01:46
February 27, 2003
- Re: procmail, cyrus and ":0 c", Gerald V. Livingston II, 23:01
- procmail, cyrus and ":0 c", Kristian Rink, 22:42
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, LuKreme, 21:16
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Don Hammond, 20:33
- Where to find hashd?, Andrew Kelley, 19:09
- Procmail Error, Dave Cook, 18:53
- Re: auto-respond, Professional Software Engineering, 18:47
- Re: auto-respond, Patrick Shanahan, 17:50
- Re: Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Professional Software Engineering, 17:31
- Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Steve Huntsberry, 16:52
- Regenerate From_ with Date in formail, Steve Huntsberry, 16:39
- Re: automatic PHP script ?, poff, 13:26
- Re: Variable substitution in condition, Professional Software Engineering, 13:00
- Variable substitution in condition, Vikram Goyal, 12:30
- Re: automatic PHP script ?, Professional Software Engineering, 10:55
- Re: automatic PHP script ?, LuKreme, 05:56
- automatic PHP script ?, Toph Kemmann, 04:29
- Re: QPOPPER SENDMAIL/PROCMAIL: AND NFS, Caram Bola, 03:31
- Re: QPOPPER SENDMAIL/PROCMAIL: AND NFS, Alan Brown, 03:31
- Re: auto-respond, LuKreme, 03:31
- Re: auto-respond, GreenTree Ground Station, 00:46
February 26, 2003
- Re: how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.? A: By putting it in /etc/procmailrc, Patrick Shanahan, 18:52
- Re: auto-respond, Sean Straw / PSE, 15:04
- Re: auto-respond, Patrick Shanahan, 14:04
- QPOPPER SENDMAIL/PROCMAIL: AND NFS, Homer Wilson Smith, 11:13
- auto-respond, { brad brace }, 11:13
- Re: how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.? A: By putting it in /etc/procmailrc, Tony L. Svanstrom, 07:09
- Re: Procmail Questions., Dallman Ross, 05:36
- RE: How do I deduce/set/control the size limit for /var/spool/mail/usermailbox, Dallman Ross, 05:36
- Re: How do I deduce/set/control the size limit for /var/spool/mail/usermailbox, Lars Hecking, 04:55
- Re: How do I deduce/set/control the size limit for /var/spool/mail/usermailbox, Dallman Ross, 04:41
- Re: how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.? A: By putting it in /etc/procmailrc, LuKreme, 03:04
- Re: how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.? A: By putting it in /etc/procmailrc, LuKreme, 03:04
- Re: how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.? A: By putting it in /etc/procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 00:44
- how can I setup a global mail filter for my organization via procmail.?, Hasan Mokhtari Sangchi, 00:18
February 25, 2003
- Re: Wierd formatting, Sam Stern, 23:26
- RE: Wierd formatting, Phuc \"Paul\" Tram, 23:10
- Re: Wierd formatting, David Turley, 20:15
- Re: Wierd formatting, Professional Software Engineering, 19:36
- Re: Wierd formatting, Paul Tram, 19:09
- Re: Wierd formatting, Professional Software Engineering, 18:49
- Wierd formatting, Paul Tram, 18:18
- Re: Procmail Questions., multimedia-fan, 18:10
- How do I deduce/set/control the size limit for /var/spool/mail/usermailbox, pboml, 16:40
- RE: Newbie (sendmail) question, Professional Software Engineering, 14:25
- Re: Procmail Questions., Professional Software Engineering, 14:25
- Re: Procmail Questions., Tony L. Svanstrom, 14:25
- Re: Procmail Questions., Henson Sturgill, 13:42
- RE: Newbie (sendmail) question, FRODRIGUEZC, 13:38
- Re: Newbie (sendmail) question, Professional Software Engineering, 13:04
- Newbie question, FRODRIGUEZC, 09:20
- Re: Procmail Questions., Dallman Ross, 02:59
- Re: furrin character sets, Professional Software Engineering, 00:39
February 24, 2003
- Re: Scoring problem, David W. Tamkin, 23:18
- Re: furrin character sets, Chuck Harding, 18:59
- Procmail Questions., multimedia-fan, 18:16
- Re: Scoring problem, Dallman Ross, 18:05
- Spam/Bounce-Mail, Joerg Frings-Fuerst, 16:07
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, S Semple, 09:08
- Re: Scoring problem, David W. Tamkin, 08:03
- Re: $ and - in Msgid, Dallman Ross, 05:49
- Re: header extraction: formail -x vs MATCH?, Dallman Ross, 05:49
- Re: Scoring problem, Dallman Ross, 05:42
February 23, 2003
- $ and - in Msgid, fleet, 21:56
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Peter H. Coffin, 20:26
- Re: furrin character sets, Peter H. Coffin, 20:22
- Scoring problem, fleet, 20:13
- Re: furrin character sets, Tony L. Svanstrom, 20:08
- Re: furrin character sets, Peter H. Coffin, 19:51
- Re: MATCH question, Dallman Ross, 07:15
February 22, 2003
- RE: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, S Semple, 22:39
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, S Semple, 22:01
- Re: MATCH question, fleet, 19:59
- Re: furrin character sets, Professional Software Engineering, 16:31
- Re: furrin character sets, Dallman Ross, 14:23
- Re: furrin character sets, Tony L. Svanstrom, 14:14
- Re: MATCH question, Dallman Ross, 13:55
- Re: furrin character sets, Dallman Ross, 13:41
- RE: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Dallman Ross, 12:29
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Tony L. Svanstrom, 11:10
- Re: Removing mail footers, Matt Dunford, 10:59
- Re: MATCH question, Matt Dunford, 10:42
- furrin character sets, Professional Software Engineering, 10:40
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, S Semple, 08:06
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Dallman Ross, 06:59
- Re: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Tony L. Svanstrom, 06:59
- RE: selective mail forwarding, Jeff Orrok, 04:04
- Re: Am I the only one who..., LuKreme, 01:52
- Re: Removing mail footers, LuKreme, 01:49
- I want to use procmail to run/pass commands to shell that came by e-mail in one account., yann . carlier, 01:39
- RE: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, S Semple, 01:28
- Re: Am I the only one who..., David W. Tamkin, 01:08
February 21, 2003
- Re: procmail to enforce mailbox quotas?, Scott Wiersdorf, 22:25
- MATCH question, fleet, 21:02
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Tony L. Svanstrom, 19:02
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Patrick Shanahan, 18:32
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Stephen Patterson, 16:21
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:04
- Re: Adding a header - at a certain location within the headers, Alan Clifford, 15:58
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Carl B. Constantine, 15:40
- Re: selective mail forwarding, Tony L. Svanstrom, 15:40
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Professional Software Engineering, 15:08
- Re: Am I the only one who..., David W. Tamkin, 15:08
- Re: aol ^TO_ very strange, Professional Software Engineering, 15:08
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Professional Software Engineering, 15:08
- Re: Am I the only one who..., Tony L. Svanstrom, 14:02
- Re: selective mail forwarding, Matt Dunford, 13:41
- Am I the only one who..., Stan Ryckman, 13:38
- selective mail forwarding, Henson Sturgill, 12:56
- Re: Removing mail footers, Tony L. Svanstrom, 06:29
- Re: Adding a header - at a certain location within the headers, Dallman Ross, 03:55
- RE: make procmail case insensitive ??, Fredrik Rodland, 03:34
- make procmail case insensitive ??, Marc van Duivenvoorde - Grip MultiMedia, 01:34
- Adding a header - at a certain location within the headers, S. Morgan Friedman, 01:34
February 20, 2003
- aol ^TO_ very strange, Henson Sturgill, 22:55
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, David W. Tamkin, 21:15
- Re: Dead.letter file from sendmail, 'Dallman Ross', 13:52
- Re: EXITCODE procmail, qmail, procmail, 12:49
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:45
- Re: Dead.letter file from sendmail, David W. Tamkin, 08:56
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, David W. Tamkin, 08:47
- Re: Forking "procmail", David W. Tamkin, 08:47
- Re: EXITCODE procmail, qmail, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 08:37
- RE: Spammish?, Dallman Ross, 07:59
- AW: Dead.letter file from sendmail, Mueller, Thomas, 07:53
- Re: Dead.letter file from sendmail, 'Dallman Ross', 07:27
- Re: EXITCODE procmail, qmail, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 06:58
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:58
- Re: [procmail] Forking "procmail", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:58
- AW: Dead.letter file from sendmail, Mueller, Thomas, 06:31
- Re: EXITCODE procmail, qmail, Lars Hecking, 05:20
- Re: Dead.letter file from sendmail, Dallman Ross, 05:20
- Dead.letter file from sendmail, Mueller, Thomas, 05:08
- EXITCODE procmail, qmail, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 04:52
- RE: How to deal fakename(_at_)real-domain(_dot_)com mail, Dallman Ross, 04:52
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, Dallman Ross, 04:52
- RE: filter with two rulles, Fredrik Rodland, 04:07
- Re: filter with two rulles, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 03:45
February 19, 2003
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH? (Tyler F. Creelan), Jeff Orrok, 22:35
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:16
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, Professional Software Engineering, 22:16
- Re: Remove string from $MATCH?, David W. Tamkin, 20:11
- Re: Multiple MATCH (Silly me!), fleet, 19:51
- Multiple MATCH, fleet, 19:28
- mid-level help, Henson Sturgill, 18:28
- Re: my mta & explanation for logfile confusion, Professional Software Engineering, 14:28
- Re: filter with two rulles, Professional Software Engineering, 14:23
- my mta & explanation for logfile confusion, Joe Leske, 11:51
- filter with two rulles, analista, 11:36
- Re: filter for expecific virus of procmail, analista, 09:18
- Re: Problem with recipe (Laurent Balloy), Jeff Orrok, 05:39
- Re: newbie needs help with attachment filter, Professional Software Engineering, 05:39
- formail flag interactions, Jeff Orrok, 02:40
- Free service, Michal Wencl, 02:33
- Re: Forking "procmail", LuKreme, 01:50
- Re: newbie needs help with attachment filter, LuKreme, 01:50
- Re: procmail writes global ruleset mail into maildir with wrong permissions [ fixed now ], bryan hunt, 01:50
February 18, 2003
- Re: Forking "procmail", David W. Tamkin, 23:10
- Re: "tofu"?, David W. Tamkin, 22:58
- Re: "tofu"?, David W. Tamkin, 22:50
- Re: "tofu"?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 20:31
- Re: "tofu"?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 20:22
- Re: "tofu"?, LuKreme, 20:17
- Re: newbie needs help with attachment filter, Professional Software Engineering, 20:05
- Re: Forking "procmail", Professional Software Engineering, 20:05
- Re: "tofu"?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:02
- newbie needs help with attachment filter, Joe Leske, 18:35
- Re: procmail to enforce mailbox quotas?, LuKreme, 18:22
- Re: Forking "procmail", LuKreme, 18:16
- Re: "tofu"?, Patrick Shanahan, 17:57
- Re: "tofu"?, Patrick Shanahan, 17:39
- Re: "tofu"?, David W. Tamkin, 16:48
- Re: procmail 3.22 H-is-always-set bug, Santiago Vila, 16:29
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:04
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 16:02
- Re: "tofu"?, Patrick Shanahan, 15:00
- procmail to enforce mailbox quotas?, Dan Hollis, 14:47
- Re: procmail writes global ruleset mail into maildir with wrong permissions, Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- Re: Spammish? (cumulative scoring methods), Professional Software Engineering, 14:33
- Re: "tofu"?, David W. Tamkin, 14:03
- Re: filter for expecific virus of procmail, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 13:59
- Re: Spammish?, Don Hammond, 13:54
- procmail 3.22 H-is-always-set bug, John Relph, 13:46
- Re: "tofu"?, Patrick Shanahan, 13:42
- filter for expecific virus of procmail, analista, 13:35
- Re: "tofu"?, Paul Chvostek, 13:09
- Re: "tofu"?, Lars Hecking, 13:03
- Re: [Procmail] "tofu"?, Ashley M. Kirchner, 13:03
- "tofu"?, David W. Tamkin, 12:54
- Re: Spammish?, Don Hammond, 12:43
- Re: Problem with recipe, fleet, 11:56
- Re: Problem with recipe "FILTER HTML", Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:50
- Re: Spammish? (Final for me), Patrick Shanahan, 11:08
- Re: Problem with recipe "FILTER HTML", Dallman Ross, 10:29
- Re: Problem with recipe "FILTER HTML", Dallman Ross, 10:29
- Re: Spammish? (Final for me), fleet, 10:01
- Re: Forking "procmail", Martin McCarthy, 10:01
February 16, 2003
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Joseph Armstrong, 22:52
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Peter H. Coffin, 22:34
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, David Thome, 22:19
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Cliff Sarginson, 21:52
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Charlie Summers, 21:24
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, David W. Tamkin, 21:04
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, David W. Tamkin, 21:04
- RE: Spammish?, fleet, 20:21
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Cliff Sarginson, 19:53
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 18:39
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Robin Lynn Frank, 18:29
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Robin Lynn Frank, 18:21
- Re: Spammish?, Dallman Ross, 17:28
- RE: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Dallman Ross, 16:58
- Re: Recipe efficiency, David W. Tamkin, 15:40
- Re: Recipe efficiency, John Conover, 15:20
- Re: Spammish?, LuKreme, 15:20
- Re: [OT??]: digest mode, was: web-based fora vs. mailing lists, LuKreme, 15:15
- Re: [OT??]: digest mode, was: web-based fora vs. mailing lists, Professional Software Engineering, 14:38
- Recipe efficiency, Dick Adams, 14:27
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Hack Hawk, 13:51
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Tony L. Svanstrom, 13:37
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, David Thome, 13:25
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 13:20
- Re: Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, Patrick Shanahan, 13:02
- [OT??]: digest mode, was: web-based fora vs. mailing lists, M. Fioretti, 13:02
- Unsubscribe me Please!!!!!!, David Thome, 12:54
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:47
- Re: noisiest posters, Professional Software Engineering, 12:47
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:45
- Re: Spammish? (cumulative scoring methods), Professional Software Engineering, 12:41
- web-based fora vs. mailing lists, David W. Tamkin, 11:46
- Re: noisiest posters, David W. Tamkin, 11:46
- Spammish - DATA, fleet, 09:47
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 09:47
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 09:47
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 09:28
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 09:28
- Re: Spammish?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 06:59
- Re: so sue me, Stephen Patterson, 05:06
- Re: Spammish?, Alan Clifford, 05:06
- Re: A cookbook would be a good idea, Professional Software Engineering, 03:53
- so sue me, Jeff Orrok, 03:53
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Professional Software Engineering, 03:34
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 03:34
- A cookbook would be a good idea, Jeff Orrok, 03:28
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 02:29
February 15, 2003
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Don Hammond, 23:38
- Re: Spammish?, Don Hammond, 23:24
- Re: Spammish?, LuKreme, 23:11
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, procmail, 23:08
- Re: Message with text/plain and text/html, Don Hammond, 21:54
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, parv, 21:36
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 21:05
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 20:44
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 20:36
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 20:36
- Re: unsubscribe me, Matt Dunford, 20:33
- Re: Spammish?, Gerald V. Livingston II, 20:15
- Re: Spammish?, David W. Tamkin, 20:12
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 20:12
- Re: update: Re: filter rules using variables, Professional Software Engineering, 20:08
- Re: filter on a header or all headers?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:04
- Re: noisiest posters, Professional Software Engineering, 20:04
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Professional Software Engineering, 20:01
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 20:01
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 19:46
- Re: filter on a header or all headers?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 19:35
- unsubscribe me, David Thome, 19:22
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Peter H. Coffin, 19:18
- Re: filter on a header or all headers?, Alan Clifford, 19:18
- Re: Spammish?, Alan Clifford, 19:12
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Alan Clifford, 18:48
- Re: update: Re: filter rules using variables, Tony L. Svanstrom, 18:45
- Re: Message with text/plain and text/html, LuKreme, 18:45
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 18:41
- Re: Spammish?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 18:33
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, fleet, 18:26
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 18:21
- filter on a header or all headers?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 18:10
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, GreenTree Ground Station, 17:58
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Don Hammond, 17:33
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Tony L. Svanstrom, 17:17
- Re: noisiest posters, David W. Tamkin, 16:58
- Re: noisiest posters, Don Hammond, 16:39
- Re: Spammish?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:31
- Re: Spammish?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 16:31
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Tim Bass, 16:26
- Re: Spammish?, Alan Clifford, 16:20
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Dick Adams, 16:15
- Help on building spam mail filter Plz, vinaykumar myadala, 16:11
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 16:07
- Re: Spammish?, Stephen Patterson, 15:38
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 15:24
- Re: noisiest posters, David W. Tamkin, 15:24
- Re: Spammish?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 15:07
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, LuKreme, 14:53
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 14:48
- Re: Spammish?, Tony L. Svanstrom, 14:20
- Re: Spammish?, fleet, 14:12
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Don Hammond, 14:12
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Tony L. Svanstrom, 13:59
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, David W. Tamkin, 13:59
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Communit y, Don Hammond, 13:51
- RE: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Tim Bass, 13:28
- Re: New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Professional Software Engineering, 13:04
- Re: Spammish?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:36
- New Procmail Recipe Forum at UNIX.COM for the Procmail Community, Tim Bass, 12:28
- Spammish?, fleet, 11:57
- Re: filter rules using variables, Tim Rice, 08:51
- Re: Message with text/plain and text/html, LuKreme, 01:57
- Re: flaky language -- too bad it's from a flake, David W. Tamkin, 01:06
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for brioche, David W. Tamkin, 00:47
February 14, 2003
- RE: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, dman, 18:06
- Re: Processing Loop, Don Hammond, 16:37
- RE: Processing Loop, Fredrik Rodland, 15:51
- Re: Processing Loop, Terry Mac Millan, 15:38
- Message with text/plain and text/html, LuKreme, 15:08
- Re: Processing Loop, Don Hammond, 14:56
- update: Re: filter rules using variables, Luke Middle, 13:43
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, LuKreme, 12:50
- filter rules using variables, Luke Middle, 12:28
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Don Hammond, 12:28
- Processing Loop, tmacmil, 12:17
- RE: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 12:17
- Re: Spurious bounce message when using procmail with Exim, Andrew Kelley, 09:05
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, LuKreme, 02:04
- Re: html conversion failing, LuKreme, 02:04
- Re: Spurious bounce message when using procmail with Exim, Professional Software Engineering, 00:12
February 13, 2003
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 23:36
- Spurious bounce message when using procmail with Exim, Andrew Kelley, 21:21
- Re: html conversion failing, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:16
- Re: html conversion failing, Stephen Patterson, 15:36
- Re: How-to Question, Chris Collins, 15:36
- Re: possibly dumb question of the week concerning logging, Fuzzy Logic, 11:04
- Re: How-to Question, Professional Software Engineering, 09:26
- How-to Question, lists, 07:53
- Re: possibly dumb question of the week concerning logging, LuKreme, 02:08
February 12, 2003
- possibly dumb question of the week concerning logging, Cliff Sarginson, 23:43
- Re: html conversion failing, LuKreme, 17:30
- RE: Internal IP address obfuscation?, Professional Software Engineering, 17:13
- Re: html conversion failing, Stephen Patterson, 15:59
- html conversion failing, Stephen Patterson, 15:21
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, dman, 14:30
- RE: Internal IP address obfuscation?, Chris Santerre, 13:15
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, David W. Tamkin, 12:59
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Don Hammond, 12:46
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 01:52
February 11, 2003
- RE: [SAtalk] RE: Deliver to multiple mailboxes, Mike Loiterman, 13:02
- Re: Extra information when logging, LuKreme, 11:23
- Re: Extra information when logging, Cliff Sarginson, 10:14
- Re: Extra information when logging, Cliff Sarginson, 10:03
- Re: Newbie problem, Tony L. Svanstrom, 09:29
- Re: Newbie problem, Professional Software Engineering, 09:29
- Re: Extra information when logging, David W. Tamkin, 09:19
- Newbie problem, Nandita Shenvi, 09:14
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, dman, 05:58
- Re: Extra information when logging, dman, 05:25
- procmail and sendmail ruleset, Stand H, 05:25
- Re: Extra information when logging, Professional Software Engineering, 05:17
- Re: Extra information when logging, Tony L. Svanstrom, 05:05
- Re: Converting HTML email (fixed), Stephen Patterson, 04:36
- Extra information when logging, Cliff Sarginson, 04:36
- RE: Deliver to multiple mailboxes, Professional Software Engineering, 04:36
- RE: Deliver to multiple mailboxes, Mike Loiterman, 03:11
- Re: Disappearing mail, LuKreme, 03:11
- Deliver to multiple mailboxes, Mike Loiterman, 02:37
- Re: exim+getmail+procmail+mutt and maildir format, Walter Echarri, 02:37
February 10, 2003
- Converting HTML email (fixed), Stephen Patterson, 16:28
- Re: Disappearing mail, Jostein Berntsen, 16:17
- Re: Disappearing mail, dman, 16:04
- Re: exim+getmail+procmail+mutt and maildir format, Jostein Berntsen, 15:12
- Disappearing mail, LuKreme, 15:04
- Re: {URGENT][Help needed][Mail Spliting Problem], Professional Software Engineering, 11:29
- Re: Global Procmailrc Issue, Professional Software Engineering, 11:29
- Global Procmailrc Issue, Scott Moseman, 10:19
- Re: Filtering digits and text from header, Tony L. Svanstrom, 04:29
- Re: Filtering digits and text from header, LuKreme, 04:23
- Re: Filtering digits and text from header, Tony L. Svanstrom, 03:32
- Filtering digits and text from header, Mike Loiterman, 00:20
February 09, 2003
- Re: {URGENT][Help needed][Mail Spliting Problem], Ganeshh, 23:33
- exim+getmail+procmail+mutt and maildir format, Walter Echarri, 22:41
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 21:19
- Re: extraneous deliver head, Professional Software Engineering, 15:17
- RE: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Professional Software Engineering, 15:17
- Re: extraneous deliver head, David Turley, 14:20
- Re: extraneous deliver head, David Turley, 14:20
- RE: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Roland Hill, 14:20
- Re: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Professional Software Engineering, 13:12
- Re: extraneous deliver head, Professional Software Engineering, 13:12
- Re: extraneous deliver head, David Turley, 12:33
- Re: extraneous deliver head, David W. Tamkin, 12:09
- extraneous deliver head, David Turley, 10:55
- Re: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Roland Hill, 02:39
February 08, 2003
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Louis LeBlanc, 20:48
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 16:08
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, dman, 15:32
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Louis LeBlanc, 15:19
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 11:25
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Louis LeBlanc, 06:18
- Re: procmail dumped into smtp mail format - how can I convert it?, Louis LeBlanc, 06:18
- Re: postmarks, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:37
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 02:14
- RE: Newbie attachment help (EPSA - Andres), Jeff Orrok, 00:43
February 07, 2003
- Re: procmail dumped into smtp mail format - how can I convert it?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:28
- Re: Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Professional Software Engineering, 23:28
- Executing a program as a recipient from ~/.procmailrc, Louis LeBlanc, 21:43
- procmail dumped into smtp mail format - how can I convert it?, Louis LeBlanc, 19:16
- me(_at_)stderr, fleet, 16:32
- Re: plussing, Professional Software Engineering, 14:28
- Re: plussing, LuKreme, 14:00
- RE: Password AutoResponder, Alan Clifford, 13:25
- Re: postmarks, Fuzzy Logic, 13:00
- postmarks, Scott Killen, 12:33
- Re: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Roland Hill, 12:21
- Re: Newbie attachment help, Professional Software Engineering, 09:13
- Re: Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Professional Software Engineering, 09:13
- Re: {URGENT][Help needed][Mail Spliting Problem], Professional Software Engineering, 09:13
- Newbie attachment help, EPSA - Andres, 07:42
- Re: flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, dman, 04:14
- Plussed addresses & procmailrcs problem, Roland Hill, 03:44
- {URGENT][Help needed][Mail Spliting Problem], Ganeshh, 02:39
- RE: Password AutoResponder, Eric Hilding, 01:47
- Re: [procmail] Newbie needs help, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 01:33
- flaky recipe -- too bad it's not for pastries, Jeff Orrok, 01:24
- Re: umask on crack, David W. Tamkin, 01:17
- umask on crack, Jeff Orrok, 01:05
February 06, 2003
- plussing, Professional Software Engineering, 22:03
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 21:58
- Re: Newbie needs help, David W. Tamkin, 20:36
- Re: Newbie needs help, Paul Tram, 19:23
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], LuKreme, 19:04
- Re: Newbie needs help, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:41
- Re: Newbie needs help, Professional Software Engineering, 18:06
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Professional Software Engineering, 18:06
- RE: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 18:06
- RE: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Roland Hill, 17:13
- Re: Newbie needs help, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:48
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Nuno Teixeira, 16:10
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:51
- RE: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 15:30
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Nuno Teixeira, 15:30
- RE: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Roland Hill, 15:24
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Professional Software Engineering, 15:04
- Re: Newbie needs help, Professional Software Engineering, 14:50
- Re: exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Nuno Teixeira, 14:50
- exit 0 and not write anything to stderr possible?, Nuno Teixeira, 14:40
- Re: Identifying HTML email (for conversion), Stephen Patterson, 14:14
- Re: spammer domains, Professional Software Engineering, 14:14
- Re: spammer domains, David W. Tamkin, 14:14
- Re: Newbie needs help, Don Hammond, 13:35
- Re: Newbie needs help, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:23
- Re: Newbie needs help, Paul Tram, 13:23
- Re: Newbie needs help, Don Hammond, 12:50
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 12:05
- spammer domains, Stephen R. Wilcoxon, 12:05
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 05:39
- Re: Newbie needs help, Professional Software Engineering, 05:39
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Roland Hill, 05:39
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], LuKreme, 05:39
- Re: Newbie needs help, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 05:39
February 05, 2003
- Newbie needs help, Paul Tram, 14:52
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Roland Hill, 14:32
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Professional Software Engineering, 12:37
- Re: writing a 'grepthread' script, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:49
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, dman, 07:51
- writing a 'grepthread' script, Zack Brown, 07:51
- New User: Locking file issue and other bits, Roland Hill, 04:05
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], LuKreme, 04:02
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits, LuKreme, 03:48
- Re: Blacklist, LuKreme, 03:22
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, dman, 03:13
- New User: Locking file issue and other bits [Part 2], Roland Hill, 03:13
- Re: forward a mail with only subject and from address, LuKreme, 03:07
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, Don Hammond, 03:02
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, Don Hammond, 02:51
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, Professional Software Engineering, 02:36
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, dman, 02:27
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, fleet, 02:22
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, fleet, 02:14
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits, Professional Software Engineering, 01:15
- Re: New User: Locking file issue and other bits, Roland Hill, 01:15
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Re: converting Unicode, Michael Powe, 01:03
February 04, 2003
- Requeue messages based on script output?, Anderson, Matt, 18:36
- newbie howto, EPSA - Andres, 12:54
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, Don Hammond, 12:39
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:32
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, fleet, 11:58
- Re: 'nuther msgid pattern?, dman, 11:11
- 'nuther msgid pattern?, fleet, 10:24
- Re: limiting scope of LOGFILE, Mark T. Valites, 10:20
- Re: limiting scope of LOGFILE, dman, 10:00
- limiting scope of LOGFILE, Mark T. Valites, 09:11
- Status of $HOME, Jake Di Toro, 08:58
- Re: Regular expressions, Chris Green, 04:15
- Regular expressions, Dick Adams, 03:08
February 03, 2003
- Re: forward a mail with only subject and from address, Professional Software Engineering, 21:50
- forward a mail with only subject and from address, Keerthi, 20:48
- Re: Identifying HTML email (for conversion), Holger Wahlen, 16:28
- Re: Identifying HTML email (for conversion), Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:26
- Identifying HTML email (for conversion), Stephen Patterson, 14:52
- Re: testing YAVR and other recipes, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 11:15
- Re: check out Knuth Re: Garbage vs Valid, Professional Software Engineering, 11:06
- Re: Blacklist, Professional Software Engineering, 10:52
- Re: mail notification, Udi Mottelo, 10:44
- Re: testing YAVR and other recipes, Udi Mottelo, 10:21
- testing YAVR and other recipes, Bill Wilson, 09:27
- Lost mail, Paul van der Vlis, 06:49
- Blacklist, Frank =?unknown?q?N=F8rvig?=, 05:58
- parse emai with AMR attachment, Nandita Shenvi, 05:17
February 02, 2003
- forward a mail with only subject and from address, Keerthi, 22:05
- Re: mail notification, wolfgang, 15:45
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, dman, 15:38
- update your generic exe filters.., Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:31
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Professional Software Engineering, 15:21
- check out Knuth Re: Garbage vs Valid, Fred Morris, 13:26
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, fleet, 13:26
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Bart Schaefer, 12:59
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Professional Software Engineering, 12:10
- mail notification, Chris Bannister, 11:07
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:41
- Re: Subdirectory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 04:29
February 01, 2003
- RE: Garbage vs Valid, Dallman Ross, 16:00
- RE: restricted form, Dallman Ross, 15:08
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, dman, 13:13
- Re: Subdirectory, dman, 12:57
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Professional Software Engineering, 12:50
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, dman, 12:33
- Subdirectory, Jostein Berntsen, 12:21
- Re: Garbage vs Valid, Tony L. Svanstrom, 11:56
- Garbage vs Valid, fleet, 11:26
- Re: converting Unicode, Patrick Shanahan, 08:10
- Re: converting Unicode, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:24
- converting Unicode, Ralph Müller, 06:38
- Re: restricted form, dman, 04:31