On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Professional Software Engineering wrote:
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:02:22 -0800
From: Professional Software Engineering
<PSE-L(_at_)mail(_dot_)professional(_dot_)org>
Reply-To: procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
To: procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
Subject: furrin character sets
That's furrin', pronounced like yar an Amerikun who has never been near a
'puter or that enternet thang. Y'all may not evun have runnin' water.
Right up front let me point out that I personally won't bother responding
to any replies which unnecessarily quote this post in its entirety. Be a
good net.citizen and excerpt just what is necessary for reply context.
M-x good_net.citizen-mode
OK, so the recipes at the end of furrin.rc set SPAMMISHNESS and ISSPAM to
possibly some value > 0 if the regexp matches - I am just now getting into
using scoring in some of my recipes and was wondering if making the condition
line be something like * ${SPAMMISHNESS}^0 or & ${ISSPAM}^0 would deliver the
message into the attendant folder if SPAMMISHNESS is indeed greater than zero,
or am I off base B-( as to how to use it?
# Ok, that absolute DOOZIE of a regexp is now defined. Let's go use it...
# ==========================================================================
# Actual recipes using the defined regexp
# Messages identifying the character set in the From: or Subject:
--
Charles D. (Chuck) Harding <charding(_at_)llnl(_dot_)gov> Voice: 925-423-8879
Senior Computer Associate Fax: 925-422-8920
Computation Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA USA http://www.llnl.gov GPG Public Key ID: B9EB6601
-- I know Karate, Kung Fu, and 47 other dangerous words --
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail