I'm not really thrilled with the information I'm getting in this
evolution; however, I *will* be able to identify (after a couple of weeks)
any recipes I have that just don't get used. I can then either retire the
recipe or figure out why it's not doing anything and rewrite it.
- fleet -
On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Alan Clifford wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2003 fleet(_at_)teachout(_dot_)org wrote:
I'm still not sure I understand why it's important to know that a
message has been identified as spam for four different reasons.
It isn't important. I sometimes look to see which recipes hve caught the
spam.
Alan
( Please do not email me AS WELL as replying to the list. Personal
email is welcome but may invoke a password autoresponder - the
current pass-through address is alan+1@ )
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail
_______________________________________________
procmail mailing list
procmail(_at_)lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE
http://MailMan.RWTH-Aachen.DE/mailman/listinfo/procmail