Patrick followed up,
| Notice that your post was *to* the *list* and I responded to the
| *list*. No more or less. I saw *no* hint that the post was ?intended?
| to be ??private??.
Yes, exactly. It was my mistake. This is the third post, I believe, in which
I'm saying so. One list member has written to me off-list to say he did
notice the lack of attribution and wondered if perhaps I had meant to send
that privately, but he and I are longtime net.acquaintances.
| I received no *private* reply.
Correct. I sent to the list by mistake.
| Your 2nd response was also public.
Yes, it was. That was intentional.
| But you opted to attack my character, to besmear
| my reputation.
I did no such thing. All along I've said that the mistake was mine.
| No further character assassination is necessary or expected.
None has occurred, and I hope none will.
| The "Reply-To: procmail(_at_)Lists(_dot_)RWTH-Aachen(_dot_)DE" header is
| specifically that I do *not* receive dups ...
And that is your right.
procmail mailing list