Procmail (date)
September 29, 2003
- Re: need script, multimedia-fan, 14:42
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 13:40
- RH-Linux/ipopd ISP - WHERE do you specify mailbox loc?, Charles Gregory, 13:05
- Re: Creating new mboxes and IMAP, Bart Schaefer, 12:41
- UW-IMAP answers, Stewart Dean, 12:28
- Re: Creating new mboxes and IMAP, David W. Tamkin, 12:12
- Re: Creating new mboxes and IMAP, Daniel Liston, 10:34
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Jason Williams, 09:59
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Dallman Ross, 06:10
September 28, 2003
- Re: Creating new mboxes and IMAP, LuKreme, 19:19
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Bart Schaefer, 19:15
- Re: Scoring by size ???, David W. Tamkin, 18:17
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Dallman Ross, 14:58
- RE: another virus for your checker, Dallman Ross, 14:05
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Dallman Ross, 13:55
- Re: Creating new mboxes and IMAP, Bart Schaefer, 12:05
- Creating new mboxes and IMAP, LuKreme, 11:16
September 27, 2003
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, John Iverson, 15:44
- need script, wilson, 12:07
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Bart Schaefer, 11:45
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, LuKreme, 11:12
- Re: Scoring by size ???, David W. Tamkin, 11:08
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Michael D Schleif, 10:48
- Re: another virus for your checker, David W. Tamkin, 09:52
- Re: Scoring by size ???, David W. Tamkin, 09:45
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Nancy McGough, 08:19
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Dallman Ross, 05:37
- Re: another virus for your checker, Dallman Ross, 05:03
- Re: another virus for your checker, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:49
- Re: [procmail] Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:46
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:43
September 26, 2003
- Re: Scoring by size ???, Michael D Schleif, 19:49
- RE: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Justin Shore, 17:52
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Martin Cooper, 17:18
- RE: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Dallman Ross, 17:08
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Jason Williams, 16:58
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Dallman Ross, 16:49
- Re: another virus for your checker, Dallman Ross, 16:49
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Dallman Ross, 16:48
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Martin Cooper, 16:48
- Re: First attempt at a recipe, Martin Cooper, 16:14
- First attempt at a recipe, Jason Williams, 15:30
- Re: another virus for your checker, Daniel Liston, 15:08
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Daniel Liston, 14:53
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, LuKreme, 14:24
- Re: procmail script for quota exceed, LuKreme, 14:12
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Bart Schaefer, 08:31
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Justin Shore, 08:10
- attachments passing thru, mbaki, 07:53
- Re: attachments passing thru, Dallman Ross, 07:36
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Dallman Ross, 04:40
- Re: another virus for your checker, Dallman Ross, 03:46
September 25, 2003
- Re: Howto use variables in regexp's ???, Scott Wiersdorf, 21:40
- Re: another virus for your checker, Michael D Schleif, 20:27
- Re: Howto use variables in regexp's ???, Michael D Schleif, 20:26
- Scoring by size ???, Michael D Schleif, 20:15
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Justin Shore, 19:53
- RE: another virus for your checker, Dallman Ross, 16:51
- Re: Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Professional Software Engineering, 15:28
- Re: Howto use variables in regexp's ???, John Conover, 14:43
- Filter for bad B64 files, Birl, 14:03
- Re: Howto use variables in regexp's ???, Dallman Ross, 14:01
- Howto use variables in regexp's ???, Michael D Schleif, 13:23
- Filtering bounces for auto-wording recipes, Justin Shore, 13:19
- Re: [adm] (was: Email Headers), Professional Software Engineering, 11:51
- Re: [adm] (was: Email Headers), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 10:38
- Re: leading .'s, Professional Software Engineering, 10:31
- leading .'s, Homer Wilson Smith, 09:28
- Re: [adm] (was: Email Headers), Professional Software Engineering, 09:14
- Re: Email Headers, Nancy McGough, 08:11
- Re: [adm] (was: Email Headers), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:07
- Re: Email Headers, Birl, 07:28
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Re: case sensitive search, Michael Powe, 04:39
- Re: case sensitive search, Dallman Ross, 04:33
- case sensitive search, Michael Powe, 04:22
September 24, 2003
- Re: Email Headers, Professional Software Engineering, 21:52
- Email Headers, Didier Casse, 21:10
- RE: Updated Virus Snaggers (ver. 1.3), Dallman Ross, 15:48
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Professional Software Engineering, 13:29
- Re: [PROCMAIL] Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Trevor Jenkins, 11:44
- Re: procmail script for quota exceed, Scott Wiersdorf, 11:43
- procmail script for quota exceed, wilson, 11:28
- procmail/sendmail - take two, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist, 06:12
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:49
September 23, 2003
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Professional Software Engineering, 18:55
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Alan Clifford, 18:26
- Howto strip specific attachments ???, Michael D Schleif, 17:07
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:32
- Re: Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Professional Software Engineering, 16:08
- Identifying spam by those numbers at the end of subject line, Dick Adams, 15:30
- Filtering by contents of body, René Mølsted, 13:54
- Re: procmail in sendmail as local mailer, Professional Software Engineering, 12:37
- procmail in sendmail as local mailer, Dave Stern - Former Rocket Scientist, 11:05
- RE: Dealing with annoying spammers using my domain in their From, Bill Polhemus, 08:54
- Dealing with annoying spammers using my domain in their From, Robert Nicholson, 07:55
September 22, 2003
- Re: [procmail] Updated Virus Snaggers (ver. 1.3), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 19:16
- Re: Updated Virus Snaggers (ver. 1.3), Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:57
- Re: Recipe Correctness ?, mpierce, 16:14
- Updated Virus Snaggers (ver. 1.3), Dallman Ross, 16:10
- Re: Filter based on length of the From address?, Professional Software Engineering, 11:10
- Re: Filter based on length of the From address?, Bart Schaefer, 11:06
- Re: Filter based on length of the From address?, David W. Tamkin, 11:06
- Filter based on length of the From address?, Brian Nesbit, 10:37
- Re: Procmail lock, Dallman Ross, 09:25
- Re: Procmail lock, David W. Tamkin, 08:28
- Re: Procmail lock, Dallman Ross, 08:15
- Procmail lock, mbaki, 07:33
- Re: Procmail lock, Jack L. Stone, 07:33
September 21, 2003
- Re: procmail] Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Christoph Maurer, 23:28
- Re: Recipe Correctness ?, Robert Arnold, 18:39
- Re: Recipe Correctness ?, Professional Software Engineering, 18:29
- Recipe Correctness ?, mpierce, 17:55
- Re: set but null, Dallman Ross, 04:30
September 20, 2003
- set but null, David W. Tamkin, 16:58
- Re: non-null or not non-null, that is the kvetch, son, Dallman Ross, 15:29
- RE: Dallman - virussnag file - question, Dallman Ross, 15:02
- Re: System-Wide Logs for Procmail?, Professional Software Engineering, 14:29
- non-null or not non-null, that is the kvetch, son, David W. Tamkin, 10:42
- Re: Dallman - virussnag file - question, David W. Tamkin, 09:08
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, LuKreme, 08:11
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 04:55
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 04:37
- Re: Dallman - virussnag file - question, Dallman Ross, 04:28
- System-Wide Logs for Procmail?, Bill Polhemus, 04:11
- Re: close brace error with virussnag recipe, Dallman Ross, 04:11
- RE: Blocking some attachments, Bill Polhemus, 04:11
- Re: [procmail] Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 03:57
September 19, 2003
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, LuKreme, 22:33
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, John Iverson, 21:58
- Re: Dallman - virussnag file - question, LuKreme, 20:54
- Re: close brace error with virussnag recipe, scott, 20:06
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, LuKreme, 19:25
- Dallman - virussnag file - question, Ken Douglass @pacbell.net, 18:31
- RE: Blocking some attachments, Bart Schaefer, 18:01
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 17:14
- Re: editing headers, Ted Baltz, 16:45
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Danny Horne, 16:45
- my virussnag stats, Nancy McGough, 16:45
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Nancy McGough, 16:38
- Re: [procmail] close brace error with virussnag recipe, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 16:19
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 16:10
- Re: close brace error with virussnag recipe, Dallman Ross, 15:58
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Nikos K. Kantarakias, 15:16
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Danny Horne, 15:00
- close brace error with virussnag recipe, scott.list, 14:35
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 14:04
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 13:34
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Nancy McGough, 12:28
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 12:17
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 12:10
- Re: Blocking some attachments, procmail, 11:59
- Re: Undeliverable Mail, Dallman Ross, 11:59
- RE: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Alan Clifford, 11:42
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 11:37
- Re: Blocking some attachments, Dallman Ross, 11:37
- Re: Blocking some attachments, Scott Wiersdorf, 11:29
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, procmail, 11:27
- RE: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Gary Funck, 11:27
- RE: Blocking some attachments, Gary Funck, 11:14
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 11:06
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, procmail, 11:06
- RE: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Nancy McGough, 11:01
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, procmail, 11:01
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Jason Tishler, 10:54
- Re: Re: Not scaling well, Enzo, 10:42
- Re: Blocking some attachments, Dallman Ross, 10:42
- RE: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Bart Schaefer, 10:19
- RE: Blocking some attachments, Gary Funck, 10:12
- Re: Blocking some attachments - RESOLVED, R A Lichtensteiger, 09:57
- Re: procmail] Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, R P Herrold, 09:51
- RE: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Gary Funck, 09:45
- Re: renaming .exe attachment help, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 09:45
- Re: Blocking some attachments - RESOLVED, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 09:31
- renaming .exe attachment help, scott.list, 09:17
- Blocking some attachments, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 08:51
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Dallman Ross, 05:16
- Re: Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Christoph Maurer, 03:57
- Ruleset for W32(_dot_)Swen(_dot_)A(_at_)mm?, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 03:41
- Re: editing headers, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 02:23
September 18, 2003
- Re: editing headers, Holger Wahlen, 16:27
- Re: editing headers, Professional Software Engineering, 15:23
- editing headers, Ted Baltz, 15:08
- Re: Not scaling well, David W. Tamkin, 13:33
- Re: Not scaling well, Enzo, 13:05
September 16, 2003
- Re: Not scaling well, culley harrelson, 23:00
- Re: Not scaling well, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:45
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Gerald V. Livingston II, 17:43
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, David W. Tamkin, 17:03
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Gerald V. Livingston II, 14:23
- Re: Not scaling well, Professional Software Engineering, 11:59
- Re: procmail will not start (?!), Professional Software Engineering, 11:59
- Re: getting one fork to set two variables (was Bit wise &), David W. Tamkin, 10:55
- Re: Bit wise &, Don Hammond, 09:05
- Re: procmail will not start (?!), R A Lichtensteiger, 08:49
- Re: Bit wise &, David W. Tamkin, 08:05
- Re: procmail will not start (?!), Christopher L. Barnard, 07:03
- Re: procmail will not start (?!), Professional Software Engineering, 04:46
- Bit wise &, Homer Wilson Smith, 04:46
- strip mime, and html - just ascii is what I want .., J., 03:18
- Re: Bit wise &, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 01:40
- Re: Not scaling well, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 00:20
September 14, 2003
- Re: or statements, DZ-Jay, 15:43
- Re: or statements, Bart Schaefer, 12:44
- Re: [procmail] or statements, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 12:37
- Re: or statements, Manojav Sridhar, 12:21
- Re: or statements, Andrew Edelstein, 12:05
- Re: or statements, DZ-Jay, 10:27
- Re: or statements, Andrew Edelstein, 10:16
- Re: or statements, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 09:31
- or statements, Manojav Sridhar, 09:11
September 13, 2003
- Re: Passing variables, LuKreme, 21:17
- Re: Passing variables (new term for it?), LuKreme, 21:12
- Re: Passing variables (new term for it?), Don Hammond, 12:09
- Re: Passing variables, Professional Software Engineering, 11:35
- Re: LOG =, Professional Software Engineering, 11:35
- Re: Passing variables (new term for it?), David W. Tamkin, 10:55
- Passing variables, LuKreme, 10:36
- Re: LOG =, LuKreme, 10:33
- Re: LOG =, David W. Tamkin, 09:44
- Re: LOG =, LuKreme, 08:49
- LOG =, Homer Wilson Smith, 08:17
September 12, 2003
- Re: Event Summary Files?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 23:40
- Re: Event Summary Files?, mpierce, 16:11
- Re: unknown users, Professional Software Engineering, 16:11
- Re: unknown users, Scott Wiersdorf, 14:23
- unknown users, Homer Wilson Smith, 14:18
- Re: Date adjustment script, Professional Software Engineering, 12:36
- Re: Event Summary Files?, Professional Software Engineering, 12:36
- Event Summary Files?, Marvin R. Pierce, 12:06
- Re: redirecting while keeping a copy, R A Lichtensteiger, 12:06
- Re: redirecting while keeping a copy, R A Lichtensteiger, 05:54
- Re: redirecting while keeping a copy, Nancy McGough, 05:54
- redirecting while keeping a copy, René Mølsted, 02:11
September 11, 2003
- Re: Date adjustment script, daniel.poelzleithner, 21:52
- Re: ---- in the mail box, Professional Software Engineering, 16:32
- Re: ---- in the mail box, Jacoub Sbaiti, 16:08
- Re: Date adjustment script, Professional Software Engineering, 15:07
- Re: ---- in the mail box, Professional Software Engineering, 15:05
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 14:50
- ---- in the mail box, Jacoub Sbaiti, 14:10
- Re: Date adjustment script, daniel.poelzleithner, 14:03
- Re: Date adjustment script, Professional Software Engineering, 13:44
- Date adjustment script, daniel.poelzleithner, 11:56
- Re: procmail users list? (fwd), Dallman Ross, 11:46
- Re: procmail users list? (fwd), Christopher L. Barnard, 11:36
- Re: procmail users list? (fwd), Professional Software Engineering, 11:21
- procmail users list? (fwd), Birl, 10:36
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Professional Software Engineering, 08:44
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Professional Software Engineering, 08:44
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Professional Software Engineering, 08:39
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, LuKreme, 07:33
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Linux, 06:46
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Scott Wiersdorf, 06:07
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Klaus Johannes Rusch, 01:24
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Robert Nicholson, 00:07
- Re: Procmail needs reference rules?, Robert Nicholson, 00:05
September 10, 2003
- Re: Procmail needs reference rules?, Professional Software Engineering, 23:14
- Re: Help with stripping off the body, Professional Software Engineering, 23:13
- Re: Procmail needs reference rules?, Robert Nicholson, 21:24
- Help with stripping off the body, Robert Nicholson, 21:18
- Re: Procmail needs reference rules?, Scott Wiersdorf, 20:21
- Procmail needs reference rules?, Robert Nicholson, 19:54
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Professional Software Engineering, 17:58
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe - FIXED, Linux, 17:32
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 17:32
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe, Linux, 16:51
- Re: Problem with the From part of my recipe, Professional Software Engineering, 15:19
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Professional Software Engineering, 14:25
- Problem with the From part of my recipe, Linux, 14:15
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, David W. Tamkin, 13:03
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Bart Schaefer, 13:02
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Professional Software Engineering, 12:41
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 11:01
- Re: Filtering Body with sendmail.cf hack, Linux, 08:23
September 09, 2003
- Re: Reply then Delete All Messages, Professional Software Engineering, 17:26
- Reply then Delete All Messages, Jay Moore, 15:37
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, David W. Tamkin, 13:20
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Professional Software Engineering, 12:53
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, Nancy McGough, 12:05
- Re: Using ^TO or ^TO_ in recipies, Bart Schaefer, 11:20
- Re: changing headers upon forwarding, David W. Tamkin, 11:03
- Re: Using ^TO or ^TO_ in recipies, David W. Tamkin, 10:52
- changing headers upon forwarding, Nikolaus Hiebaum, 10:23
- Using ^TO or ^TO_ in recipies, Daniel Liston, 10:23
- Re: WARN: Proof-of-Concept code for the Office VBE BO is available, Daniel Liston, 09:04
September 08, 2003
- WARN: Proof-of-Concept code for the Office VBE BO is available, John D. Hardin, 12:31
- Re: Time to bury the delicious dead horse ('Twas procmail: No permission to execute), David W. Tamkin, 12:30
- Time to bury the delicious dead horse ('Twas procmail: No permission to execute), Birl, 11:51
- Adding filters on userlevel, René Mølsted, 11:43
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Chris Sherman, 08:46
- Re: nevermind the delicious dead horse, Birl, 05:59
- Re: A yummy dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 05:59
- Re: dead horse (yummy) -- procmail: No permission to execute, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:33
September 07, 2003
- nevermind the delicious dead horse, David W. Tamkin, 18:17
- Re: dead horse (yummy) -- procmail: No permission to execute, David W. Tamkin, 18:15
- ANN: Procmail Sanitizer 1.139 is released, John D. Hardin, 18:11
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:13
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 16:23
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), DZ-Jay, 14:15
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:19
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Dallman Ross, 12:46
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Gerald V. Livingston II, 12:28
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Dallman Ross, 12:15
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Dallman Ross, 12:10
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Professional Software Engineering, 11:56
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), DZ-Jay, 11:55
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Gerald V. Livingston II, 11:41
September 05, 2003
- update on virus word filtering, Dragoncrest, 20:56
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 20:01
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 19:11
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Daniel Liston, 15:44
- Re[2]: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Gerald V. Livingston II, 13:40
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Daniel Liston, 12:48
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Birl, 12:28
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 12:22
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:48
- Re: [procmail] Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:39
- Re: Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Scott Wiersdorf, 11:01
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Gerald V. Livingston II, 10:55
- Simple question (unless you're living with no sleep), Gerald V. Livingston II, 10:46
- Re: Autoresponder, David W. Tamkin, 10:41
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 10:35
- Re: Autoresponder, Christoph Berg, 09:24
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Bart Schaefer, 09:24
- Re: dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Christoph Berg, 09:20
- dead horse -- procmail: No permission to execute, Birl, 09:01
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, David W. Tamkin, 08:51
- Re: Autoresponder, DZ-Jay, 08:45
- Re: Escaped characters, David W. Tamkin, 08:45
- Re: Escaped characters, DZ-Jay, 08:45
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Bart Schaefer, 08:21
- Escaped characters, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 08:01
- Re: Autoresponder, David W. Tamkin, 07:42
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 07:42
- Autoresponder, Steffen Bisgaard - Xtrasource, 06:29
- Re: simple procmail log parsing script, J., 03:21
September 04, 2003
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, David W. Tamkin, 08:46
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Udi Mottelo, 04:14
- Re: [procmail] Executing ... No such file or directory, Dallman Ross, 03:49
- Re: [procmail] Executing ... No such file or directory, Dallman Ross, 03:30
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 02:07
September 03, 2003
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, David W. Tamkin, 19:09
- Re: [procmail] Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 18:25
- Procmail logfile, Noarmun E. Mailer, 18:25
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Marhaus, 17:57
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, David W. Tamkin, 17:49
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 17:24
- Re: MailBox size problem, Christoph Berg, 11:08
- Re: Executing ... No such file or directory, Jake Di Toro, 10:38
- Executing ... No such file or directory, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 08:26
- Re: Reinjecting emails into procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 08:12
- Re: Reinjecting emails into procmail, Jake Di Toro, 07:47
- RE: MailBox size problem, Dallman Ross, 07:42
- Re: MailBox size problem, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 07:40
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Udi Mottelo, 04:48
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Udi Mottelo, 04:22
- Re: MailBox size problem, Dallman Ross, 04:03
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, Marhaus, 02:32
- RE: MailBox size problem, LuKreme (List User Kreme), 02:10
September 02, 2003
- Re: Reinjecting emails into procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 23:41
- Re: Reinjecting emails into procmail, Scott Wiersdorf, 23:31
- RE: Reinjecting emails into procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 23:23
- Reinjecting emails into procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 23:21
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 19:39
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, David W. Tamkin, 19:19
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 17:42
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, David W. Tamkin, 13:35
- RE: MailBox size problem, Jason Crowe, 12:44
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Ruud H.G. van Tol, 11:54
- Re: Intermittent behaviour by procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 11:41
- Intermittent behaviour by procmail, Gonzalo Servat, 11:31
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Udi Mottelo, 10:22
- Re: MailBox size problem, Santiago Vila, 09:19
- MailBox size problem, Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz, 09:14
- Updated Cygwin Package: procmail-3.22-8, Jason Tishler, 08:55
- Re: Sendmail, procmail & quotas, Scott Wiersdorf, 08:44
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Tim Rice, 08:42
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Marhaus, 07:32
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, David W. Tamkin, 07:28
- simple procmail log parsing script, culley harrelson, 03:34
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, LuKreme, 03:29
- Re: How to send the original after filter?, Udi Mottelo, 02:44
September 01, 2003
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Dragoncrest, 21:27
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Tim Rice, 10:02
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Michael D Schleif, 09:57
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Dragoncrest, 09:19
- Re: Case insensitive searches?, Tim Rice, 08:57
- Case insensitive searches?, Dragoncrest, 08:23