Re[2]: Lawsuits, angry business users, and SPF stupidity.

> > You wrote "SPF was initially proposed by a remailer service."
W> So you *did* actually read what I posted? I note then that this is the 
W> only point which you've managed to coherently pick up on, so I will take 
W> the rest of what I've said as valid.

W>  > ... well,
> > go on then: explain to me step-by-step how this "remailer service" is
> > going to allow me to send my email from my hotmail.com address to
> > someone whos ISP uses SPF? Oh yes - and in case it needed saying,
> > lets pretend that Microsoft refuse to list your remaillers IP address
> > in any of their DNS servers...
W> This has nothing to do with Microsoft. The SPF records relevant here are 
W> those of hotmail. Do please read, and attempt to understand, the 
W> specification of the protocol that you're attempting to attack.

So can I assume by your decision not to answer this that you now
understand my point, and acknowledge I'm right?  (Microsoft still own
Hotmail don't they?)  Try answering this (step by step) if you're
unsure.

-------
Sender Permitted From: http://spf.pobox.com/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
Latest draft at http://spf.pobox.com/draft-mengwong-spf-02.9.4.txt
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your 
subscription, 
please go to 
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname(_at_)©#«Mo\¯HÝÜîU;±¤Ö¤Íµø?¡