SPF Discuss (date)
November 30, 2004
- SPF Council Mailing List, Chuck Mead, 20:17
- Thoughts on the next steps for the council, wayne, 20:13
- Broken SPF implementation, M Z R, 20:09
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stephen Pollei, 18:54
- RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, David Woodhouse, 18:16
- RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, Greg Connor, 17:44
- Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Greg Connor, 17:22
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:01
- RE: PTR problems, Greg Connor, 16:51
- SPF implementation with fake DSN blocking via SRS, Tom Lahti, 16:41
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Greg Connor, 16:30
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Greg Connor, 15:32
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- RegisterFly Supports SPF, marc, 13:42
- Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Frank Ellermann, 13:37
- GoDaddy now supports SPF records and TXT records, wayne, 13:25
- RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Guy, 13:14
- RE: Role for the new council??, Andy Bakun, 12:58
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 12:56
- Re: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Ralf Doeblitz, 12:44
- RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:51
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:46
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:37
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 09:04
- Re[4]: OT: education needed, Sanford Whiteman, 08:07
- RE: Role for the new council??, Nigel J. Carr, 07:59
- RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, David Woodhouse, 07:46
- RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Brad Glore, 07:35
- Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, Arik Baratz, 07:24
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:53
- RE: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Brad Glore, 06:35
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 06:33
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:17
- Introducing META Signatures (a unification of DK, IIM, MTA Signatures plus support for linking to S/MIME and PGP), william(at)elan.net, 05:09
- Re: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, william(at)elan.net, 03:45
- RE: RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, gary, 03:34
- Re: Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, william(at)elan.net, 03:25
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, william(at)elan.net, 03:10
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, Rene Barbier, 02:55
- Objections TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 02:50
- RESULTS of the VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL - plus, recording officers statement, jpinkerton, 02:41
- RE: Re[2]: OT: education needed, Richard Bang, 02:14
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, jpinkerton, 02:09
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, william(at)elan.net, 01:24
- Re[2]: OT: education needed, Sanford Whiteman, 00:39
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Meng Weng Wong, 00:25
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Roger Moser, 00:20
November 29, 2004
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 21:34
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 20:51
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 20:46
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 20:36
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:45
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, wayne, 19:44
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:42
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:40
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:56
- Re: we're not deaf, Frank Ellermann, 18:43
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 17:58
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 17:32
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 17:14
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stephen Pollei, 15:56
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Meng Weng Wong, 15:38
- Re: PTR problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:31
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 15:23
- RE: we're not deaf (was: Attacking Domain Keys), Seth Goodman, 15:21
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 15:15
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 15:00
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 14:57
- Sourceforge SPF problems, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:49
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 14:47
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 14:34
- data point: SPF is used over 500 times as much as SenderID, wayne, 14:16
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, wayne, 13:47
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:42
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:40
- What is the load on DNS caused by SPF?, guy, 13:34
- we're not deaf (was: Attacking Domain Keys), Frank Ellermann, 13:33
- RE: PTR problems, Mark, 13:06
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 12:56
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 12:49
- RE: Attacking Domain Keys, Seth Goodman, 12:36
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 12:33
- Re: PTR problems, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:25
- Re: PTR problems, administrator, 12:17
- RE: OT: education needed, Mark, 08:43
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:39
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Bowyer, 08:26
- Re: OT: education needed, Peter Bowyer, 08:20
- Re: OT: education needed, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:11
- RE: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:10
- RE: OT: education needed, Bruce Barnes, 08:04
- OT: education needed, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:51
- RE: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 05:51
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:16
- Re: Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, David Woodhouse, 02:46
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:35
November 28, 2004
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 5th AND LAST REMINDER, wayne, 22:17
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, wayne, 18:11
- Re: Role for the new council??, Meng Weng Wong, 17:41
- FYI: Will be away until Thursday, Julian Mehnle, 16:16
- RE: lists.sourceforge.net messed up their SPF record?, Julian Mehnle, 16:09
- Re: Role for the new council??, Andy Bakun, 14:06
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 5th AND LAST REMINDER, jpinkerton, 13:50
- lists.sourceforge.net messed up their SPF record?, Mark, 06:23
- Re: PTR problems, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:05
- Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:54
- implementing forwarding via ODMR (was Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding), Andy Bakun, 00:07
November 27, 2004
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 18:18
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Shane Rush, 14:36
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Jim Hill, 05:03
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 4th REMINDER, jpinkerton, 03:15
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Andy Bakun, 02:57
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 01:18
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 01:18
November 26, 2004
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Raymond Neeves, 21:43
- Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Rand Wacker, 21:23
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 21:13
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Frank Ellermann, 20:39
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 16:50
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, william(at)elan.net, 16:21
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 14:52
- PTR problems, administrator, 14:35
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Andy Bakun, 13:06
- Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 12:39
- Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Stephen Pollei, 11:55
- RE: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, terry, 11:44
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Meng Weng Wong, 10:11
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, wayne, 09:33
- Re: Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, David Woodhouse, 09:31
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Richard Bang, 09:27
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics, Rand Wacker, 09:13
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:57
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 08:57
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 08:48
- Re: domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, wayne, 08:44
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Richard Bang, 08:39
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 08:35
- domain name labels are limited to 63 characters, Roger Moser, 08:30
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Roger Moser, 08:17
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 08:16
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 08:15
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 08:10
- RE: portent.listbox.com, Richard Bang, 08:09
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, George Schlossnagle, 08:00
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 08:00
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, James Couzens, 07:48
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 07:46
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 07:45
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 07:41
- RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 07:40
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, Theo Schlossnagle, 07:32
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 07:17
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 07:05
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 07:02
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Tony Finch, 06:57
- RE: Ignoring rejected mail?, Mark, 06:54
- Re: Attacking Domain Keys, David Woodhouse, 06:54
- Re: Ignoring rejected mail?, Tony Finch, 06:49
- Attacking Domain Keys, James Couzens, 06:47
- Ignoring rejected mail?, Philip Warner, 06:47
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 06:39
- RE: portent.listbox.com, Mark, 06:37
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:26
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 06:17
- RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 06:12
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 05:44
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 05:43
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), David Woodhouse, 05:41
- portent.listbox.com, Richard Bang, 05:40
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 05:36
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), Frank Ellermann, 05:25
- Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Peter Snow, 05:19
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 05:06
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 3rd REMINDER, jpinkerton, 04:43
- Re: "worm spam" and SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:30
- Re[2]: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Snow, 04:29
- Re: "worm spam" and SPF, David Woodhouse, 04:27
- My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), william(at)elan.net, 04:25
- Re: My notes from FTC Summit with statistics (was: Sendmail white paper), David Woodhouse, 04:21
- "worm spam" and SPF, Fridrik Skulason, 04:13
- Role for the new council??, Nigel J. Carr, 04:11
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 03:04
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 01:54
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), James Couzens, 01:49
- Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 01:47
- Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 01:42
November 25, 2004
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Roger Moser, 23:36
- RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Roger Moser, 23:36
- RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Guy, 18:55
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 18:54
- Re: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Frank Ellermann, 17:33
- Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 17:16
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Julian Mehnle, 15:41
- RE: HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, terry, 15:41
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Peter Bowyer, 15:36
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 14:41
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 14:09
- Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, James Couzens, 14:06
- RE: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, terry, 13:49
- RE: MX record check?, Richard Bang, 09:57
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, wayne, 08:24
- Roberto Olivares is out of the office., Roberto E Olivares, 08:01
- Re: Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), wayne, 07:22
- HOWTO: track SPF requests to see who says to be you, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:15
- Re: MX record check?, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:51
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), jpinkerton, 05:40
- MX record check?, Scott Wilson, 05:21
- Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Raymond Neeves, 05:06
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- 2nd REMINDER, jpinkerton, 05:04
- Re: I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:35
- Re: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Chris Haynes, 03:26
- I told you so (Thunderbird stupidity), Chris Drake, 03:02
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Mark Shewmaker, 01:14
November 24, 2004
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mike Markley, 23:26
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 20:19
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 20:02
- Campaign: If elected I will ..., Mark Shewmaker, 19:56
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 19:41
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 14:06
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Greg Connor, 13:03
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 12:58
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Douglas K. Fischer, 12:54
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Rand Wacker, 12:45
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 12:39
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 12:39
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Douglas K. Fischer, 12:37
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 12:37
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 12:34
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", David Woodhouse, 11:51
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 11:47
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Meng Weng Wong, 11:40
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 11:32
- Re: [STOP THREAD] Sendmail white paper (which is really about forwarding and -all), Meng Weng Wong, 11:30
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Hammer, 11:25
- Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 11:03
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Rand Wacker, 09:52
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 09:43
- Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 08:07
- RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 07:32
- Phishing in the news.., jpinkerton, 07:16
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 07:14
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 07:08
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Michael Hammer, 06:54
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 06:40
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 06:39
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:32
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Michael Hammer, 06:22
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 05:50
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 05:46
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:25
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 05:25
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:13
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Bruce Barnes, 05:04
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 04:51
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 04:26
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chris Haynes, 03:59
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:42
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Andy Bakun, 03:27
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 03:20
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:11
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 02:52
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendma, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:45
- RE: Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white, Mark, 02:43
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 02:42
- RE: Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 02:39
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 02:38
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Richard Bang, 02:35
- Re: Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:28
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:20
- Proposed policy on Forwarding. (Was: Re: Sendmail white paper), Chris Haynes, 02:18
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:07
- RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Mark, 01:57
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 01:46
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 01:44
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 01:28
- Re: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:24
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 01:17
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 01:17
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL -- REMINDER, jpinkerton, 01:12
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 01:09
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 00:56
- RE: SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Guy, 00:07
November 23, 2004
- SPF lookup with intermediate ISP mail relay, Rolf, 23:24
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 22:09
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 18:28
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:56
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 17:26
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:54
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 15:48
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:46
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 15:42
- Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Greg Connor, 15:18
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 15:10
- acronym soup and request for urls, Stephen Pollei, 15:09
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Jeff Macdonald, 15:08
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 14:36
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 14:15
- Re: Voters register, Frank Ellermann, 13:19
- Re: Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, wayne, 13:12
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 13:11
- OT -- stop IP address spoofing?, Stephen Pollei, 12:58
- Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 12:57
- Re: What's up with the Adoption Roll, Frank Ellermann, 12:47
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Mark Shewmaker, 12:46
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 12:34
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 12:31
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 12:28
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stephen Pollei, 12:23
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Frank Ellermann, 12:06
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 12:02
- RE: What's up with the Adoption Roll, terry, 11:35
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 11:22
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Greg Connor, 11:02
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Frank Ellermann, 10:57
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:56
- What's up with the Adoption Roll, Jon Bertrand, 10:51
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:50
- RE: Re: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:48
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:48
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 10:47
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 10:46
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:45
- Re: Voters register, george+spf, 10:43
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 10:41
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:39
- Re: Voters register, Greg Connor, 10:38
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Frank Ellermann, 10:36
- Re: URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, Greg Connor, 10:30
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:30
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Daniel Taylor, 10:20
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:19
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 10:14
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 10:10
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 10:08
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 10:02
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 09:47
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Frank Ellermann, 09:46
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:43
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 09:38
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Scott Kitterman, 09:26
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 09:23
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 09:15
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, wayne, 07:56
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 07:49
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, wayne, 07:31
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 07:06
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 06:41
- RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, terry, 06:41
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 06:33
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 06:28
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 06:20
- RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, terry, 06:11
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stefan Engelbert, 06:10
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Mark, 06:05
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 05:55
- RE: Voters register, terry, 05:53
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, terry, 05:49
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 05:41
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 05:30
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, David Woodhouse, 05:27
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 05:12
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:54
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, David Woodhouse, 04:35
- RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, David Woodhouse, 04:24
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, James Couzens, 04:21
- Re: RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, James Couzens, 04:12
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:10
- Re: RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, James Couzens, 04:07
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 04:07
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, James Couzens, 04:00
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:59
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, James Couzens, 03:59
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stefan Engelbert, 03:57
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, James Couzens, 03:57
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 03:55
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address sp, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:54
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP addres, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:52
- RE: Voters register, Stefan Engelbert, 03:52
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 03:51
- RE: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IPaddress spoofi, Stefan Engelbert, 03:49
- RE: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, Stefan Engelbert, 03:48
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 03:47
- Re: Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, David Woodhouse, 03:47
- Re: Voters register, jpinkerton, 03:46
- Re: Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofi, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:41
- Can the SPF technique be used to stop IP address spoofing?, David Woodhouse, 03:36
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:35
- RE: Voters register, Stefan Engelbert, 03:34
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 03:29
- Re: Voters register, william(at)elan.net, 03:25
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 03:07
- Voters register, jpinkerton, 02:41
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 02:41
- URGENT: Community Position on SenderID, James Couzens, 02:34
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, James Couzens, 02:23
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:19
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, william(at)elan.net, 01:33
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Greg Connor, 00:17
November 22, 2004
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, James Couzens, 17:25
- RE: update of "welcome to the list" message, terry, 17:23
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, william(at)elan.net, 17:16
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 17:10
- Re: update of "welcome to the list" message, Chris Haynes, 16:20
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 15:09
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures - Voting for yourself, Mark, 15:05
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 15:00
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 14:37
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 14:24
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 14:18
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 13:54
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 13:40
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Stephen Pollei, 12:03
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 11:59
- update of "welcome to the list" message, Meng Weng Wong, 11:36
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, terry, 11:24
- Re: MUAs checking SPF, Frank Ellermann, 11:23
- Re: Re: MUAs checking SPF, william(at)elan.net, 10:48
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:45
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Frank Ellermann, 10:39
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:34
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:21
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 10:07
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 10:06
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 10:06
- Re: Re: MUAs checking SPF, Andy Bakun, 10:06
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 10:01
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 09:58
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Tony Finch, 09:52
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Tony Finch, 09:48
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 09:47
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:41
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 09:36
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Richard Bang, 09:32
- Re: Re: SES, Hannah Schroeter, 09:29
- Re: MUAs checking SPF, Frank Ellermann, 09:24
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 09:23
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 09:19
- RE: Forwarding is spoofing Was: ElectronicFrontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 09:12
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, George Schlossnagle, 09:05
- Re: Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 09:05
- Forwarding is spoofing Was: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:53
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 08:46
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 08:34
- Re: MUAs checking SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 08:23
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 08:16
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Daniel Taylor, 07:47
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:32
- Re: CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, wayne, 07:22
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Stefan Engelbert, 06:29
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 06:23
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 05:51
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Frank Ellermann, 05:31
- Re: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 05:05
- RE: Sendmail white paper, David Woodhouse, 05:00
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 03:07
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 03:02
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Frank Ellermann, 02:40
- Initial Voting Procedures - Voting for yourself, jpinkerton, 02:35
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Bruce Barnes, 02:14
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), jpinkerton, 01:47
- CALL TO VOTE FOR THE SPF COUNCIL, jpinkerton, 01:46
- MUAs checking SPF, Andy Bakun, 01:13
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 00:07
November 21, 2004
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 23:54
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 19:16
- Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 18:56
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 18:44
- Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 18:24
- RE: Re[2]: SPF too late?, Seth Goodman, 15:34
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry, 15:24
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 15:22
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Tony Finch, 15:18
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 15:11
- RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, terry, 15:08
- RE: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, terry, 15:06
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 14:56
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 14:47
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 14:16
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 13:48
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 13:12
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Chuck Mead, 13:09
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 13:02
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Tony Finch, 13:02
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Tony Finch, 12:52
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 12:30
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 12:30
- RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Stephen Pollei, 12:00
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, william(at)elan.net, 11:54
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, David Woodhouse, 10:58
- RE: Sendmail white paper, terry, 10:53
- Re: Sendmail white paper, M Z R, 10:10
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong, 10:03
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Graham Murray, 09:57
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 09:53
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 08:52
- RE: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, terry, 08:24
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Fridrik Skulason, 08:09
- RE: Sendmail white paper, MW Mike Weiner (5028), 07:30
- Re: Sendmail white paper, James Couzens, 05:48
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, David Woodhouse, 05:39
- RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, william(at)elan.net, 01:24
- Fw: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 00:41
- RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Seth Goodman, 00:23
November 20, 2004
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Roger Moser, 23:09
- Re: Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 16:09
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 13:57
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Roger Moser, 13:37
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures, Stephen Pollei, 13:29
- Re: Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 13:14
- Re: Personal attacks, Chuck Mead, 13:13
- Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 12:53
- Re: Personal attacks, Greg Connor, 12:49
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Roger Moser, 12:47
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 12:44
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, John A. Martin, 12:33
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 12:02
- Re: Sendmail white paper, william(at)elan.net, 12:02
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 12:00
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 11:55
- Re: Sendmail white paper, wayne, 11:51
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, wayne, 11:51
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 11:39
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 11:35
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 11:33
- Re: Sendmail white paper, George Schlossnagle, 11:30
- RE: Sendmail white paper, william(at)elan.net, 11:12
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 11:09
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:58
- RE: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:26
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 10:23
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Roger Moser, 10:11
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 09:58
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Theo Schlossnagle, 09:52
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Michael Weiner, 09:48
- RE: Sendmail white paper, Mark, 09:40
- Re: Sendmail white paper, SRS, and forwarding, Meng Weng Wong, 09:37
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, terry, 09:32
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 09:29
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), terry, 09:23
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 09:21
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 09:17
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Meng Weng Wong, 08:57
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Chuck Mead, 08:53
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 08:25
- Re: Sendmail white paper, Michael Weiner, 07:20
- Sendmail white paper, Roy Badami, 07:14
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Roger Moser, 06:12
- using both SPF and DomainKeys, Roger Moser, 06:12
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:33
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Benjamin Franz, 05:23
- Re[2]: SPF too late?, Chris Drake, 04:43
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 03:37
- Re: Unknown mechanisms in SPF, Frank Ellermann, 02:19
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, Frank Ellermann, 01:42
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 01:19
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 00:39
November 19, 2004
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 23:34
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-01 now available, wayne, 23:00
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Meng Weng Wong, 22:55
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 22:41
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 21:54
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 21:37
- Unknown mechanisms in SPF, wayne, 21:29
- Re: using both SPF and DomainKeys, Michael Weiner, 21:22
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nick Phillips, 20:46
- using both SPF and DomainKeys, Meng Weng Wong, 20:31
- Re: OT - Telephone Caller ID, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 20:18
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 19:49
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Jim Hill, 17:27
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:13
- RE: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Mark, 16:50
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 16:39
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 16:26
- Re: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Shane Rush, 15:22
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nick Phillips, 15:18
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), Frank Ellermann, 14:58
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 14:52
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 14:48
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), Frank Ellermann, 14:42
- RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, James Couzens, 14:33
- MAAWG Whitepaper that you can READ! (PS/HTML formats), James Couzens, 14:31
- Re: TXT lookup problem, Frank Ellermann, 14:22
- RE: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 14:10
- Re: FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), wayne, 14:00
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 13:54
- RE: Re: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 13:52
- Re: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Frank Ellermann, 13:45
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 12:28
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 12:23
- OT - Telephone Caller ID, Scott Kitterman, 12:19
- OT -- Caller-Id forge -- was ... EFF ... Mentions SPF, Stephen Pollei, 12:12
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 12:09
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 12:08
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Bruce Barnes, 12:07
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 11:57
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, william(at)elan.net, 11:56
- RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Guy, 11:50
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 11:43
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:29
- FW: Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 11:12
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 11:10
- GOSSiP available on sourceforge.net, Mark C. Langston, 11:03
- Comments on MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Scott Kitterman, 10:30
- Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 10:14
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Shane Rush, 10:05
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 09:38
- Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 09:30
- RE: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights o ver the Internet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:24
- Re: TXT lookup problem, Meng Weng Wong, 09:22
- Dynamic Senders List (aka SPF Whitelist), Brian Barrios, 09:22
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Stefan Engelbert, 09:19
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:13
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Mark, 09:11
- Re: TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:44
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Sander Steffann, 08:44
- Re: TXT lookup problem, wayne, 08:43
- RE: TXT lookup problem, Stefan Engelbert, 08:42
- TXT lookup problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:35
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 08:23
- RE: support web forum wording (Meng, read this), Scott Kitterman, 08:16
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 07:59
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 07:24
- RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:07
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 06:13
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, James Couzens, 05:45
- Re: Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:30
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:27
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article OnAnti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 05:26
- Re: Softfail problem at Amazon, Carl Hutzler, 05:12
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 04:50
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Chris Haynes, 04:48
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Chris Haynes, 04:33
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:20
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:18
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:03
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 01:59
- RE: Softfail problem at Amazon, Guy, 01:38
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 01:18
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 00:55
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 00:37
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, jpinkerton, 00:29
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Rene Barbier, 00:00
November 18, 2004
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 23:41
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 23:38
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 23:01
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 22:59
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Greg Connor, 22:58
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 22:51
- Softfail problem at Amazon, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:20
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 21:35
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 21:32
- RE: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Guy, 21:27
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 19:55
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 19:45
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 19:13
- RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 18:36
- Re: MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Frank Ellermann, 18:34
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 18:00
- RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 17:44
- MAAWG Whitepaper released Nov 18, Meng Weng Wong, 17:43
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 17:31
- RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 17:23
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 17:21
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 16:58
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:50
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 16:26
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 15:42
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 15:41
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, jpinkerton, 15:33
- RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 15:29
- RE: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 15:21
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Vivien M., 15:11
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 14:46
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 14:38
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Mark, 14:36
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 14:31
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 14:00
- Re: Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 13:08
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Guy, 13:03
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, wayne, 12:58
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:56
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 12:29
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 12:11
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 11:49
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, jpinkerton, 11:00
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 10:39
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Theo Schlossnagle, 10:10
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Dave Crocker, 09:59
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Benjamin Franz, 09:33
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:23
- RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Jon Bertrand, 09:12
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Hannah Schroeter, 09:10
- Re: Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 07:34
- Re: Voting testers please, Michael Hammer, 07:26
- Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 07:04
- Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 06:53
- Re: Voting testers please, Frank Ellermann, 06:38
- Re: SPF too late?, Frank Ellermann, 06:26
- Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Frank Ellermann, 06:15
- Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Nico Kadel-Garcia, 05:14
- Re: Voting testers please, Marc Kool, 01:12
November 17, 2004
- RE: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights o ver the Internet?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:06
- Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 22:06
- Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 21:54
- Re: MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, Alan Madill, 21:22
- MEDIA: Is Microsoft Ready to Assert IP Rights over the Internet?, william(at)elan.net, 21:11
- Re: SPF too late?, Meng Weng Wong, 17:14
- RE: SPF too late?, Seth Goodman, 15:30
- I-D ACTION:draft-leibzon-emailredirection-traceheaders-00.txt (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 14:19
- RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 14:02
- Re: SPF too late?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:10
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 13:04
- Re: Voting testers please, william(at)elan.net, 12:21
- RE: SPF too late?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:13
- Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Michael Hammer, 12:09
- RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:03
- Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 11:45
- Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, william(at)elan.net, 08:46
- Re: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Michael Hammer, 08:42
- RE: New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Mark, 08:36
- RE: Voting testers please, terry, 08:11
- New US Law On Anti-Trust And Standards Bodies, Scott Kitterman, 08:11
- RE: Voting testers please, gary, 08:00
- RE: Voting testers please, Julian Mehnle, 07:49
- RE: Voting testers please, Scott Kitterman, 07:37
- Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 07:32
- Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 07:11
- Re: Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 07:05
- Voting testers please, jpinkerton, 06:28
- Re: SPF too late?, Fridrik Skulason, 02:25
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 01:30
November 16, 2004
- Campaign: If elected I will ..., william(at)elan.net, 21:41
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 21:40
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 21:25
- RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 21:24
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 21:24
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 21:22
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 21:20
- RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 21:19
- RE: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Guy, 21:15
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 21:13
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Guy, 21:12
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 21:09
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 21:07
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 21:01
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Michael Weiner, 20:51
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Chuck Mead, 20:42
- Re: MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, jdoupe+spf, 20:11
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 19:27
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 18:56
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 18:52
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 18:35
- MX Logic CTO speaks out on spam and authentication, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 18:30
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 18:13
- RE: SPF too late?, Julian Mehnle, 18:11
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 18:06
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 17:59
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 17:51
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 17:42
- SPF too late?, Chris Drake, 17:35
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 17:33
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 16:50
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Stuart D. Gathman, 16:41
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Greg Connor, 16:04
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Greg Connor, 15:59
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 15:56
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 14:44
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:43
- Re: Fw: Resignation, Frank Ellermann, 12:07
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 09:53
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:27
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 09:09
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 09:05
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 08:46
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:41
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 08:38
- Re: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Michael Hammer, 08:32
- RE: Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 07:58
- Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) Article On Anti-Spam Technologies Mentions SPF, Scott Kitterman, 07:42
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Stuart D. Gathman, 07:34
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 05:40
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 03:29
- Fw: Resignation, jpinkerton, 03:05
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:36
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), jpinkerton, 01:54
November 15, 2004
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00 now available, Frank Ellermann, 19:31
- Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, wayne, 18:17
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00 now available, wayne, 18:14
- Campaign: If elected I will ...., wayne, 18:09
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Michael Hammer, 17:58
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Mark, 17:17
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov14 2004), Mark, 17:16
- Regarding my nomination, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 16:20
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Mark Shewmaker, 14:42
- Build on the work of others (was: Please remove me as council candidate), Frank Ellermann, 14:33
- Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 12:31
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Jonathan Gardner, 12:28
- Re: I am not back (yet), James Couzens, 12:26
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:26
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Hector Santos, 12:11
- I am not back (yet), Koen Martens, 12:06
- Re: Please remove me as council candidate, Frank Ellermann, 10:02
- Re: Re: Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 09:32
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 09:30
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Julian Mehnle, 09:17
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Frank Ellermann, 09:05
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 08:56
- Re: Please remove me as council candidate, Frank Ellermann, 08:48
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 08:46
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPFLeadership Council", terry, 08:44
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 08:37
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 08:36
- Re: Digest 1.631 for spf-discuss, Shane Rush, 08:33
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 08:32
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 07:54
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 07:53
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 06:45
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 06:43
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 06:22
- RE: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 142004), terry, 06:19
- If I am elected, Koen Martens, 03:38
- Voting procedures, Koen Martens, 03:22
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 02:31
- Re: Campaign: If elected I will..., Greg Connor, 02:09
- Re: Digest 1.631 for spf-discuss, Koen Martens, 01:59
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 01:56
- Please remove me as council candidate, James Couzens, 01:45
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Greg Connor, 01:40
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, James Couzens, 01:38
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), Greg Connor, 01:35
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), James Couzens, 01:33
- Re: Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), jpinkerton, 00:47
- Initial Voting Procedures (updated 23:15pm Nov 14 2004), william(at)elan.net, 00:39
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 11/15/04, Wayne Schlitt, 00:35
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Rene Barbier, 00:08
November 14, 2004
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 23:32
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 22:50
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Stuart D. Gathman, 22:26
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Chuck Mead, 19:48
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 18:47
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 18:29
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Seth Goodman, 18:02
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 17:12
- Campaign: If elected I will..., Mark, 16:53
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 16:34
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 16:29
- Re: Prefer all these polls and elections on another channel., Shane Rush, 16:03
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 15:15
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 15:10
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 14:52
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the"SPF Leadership Council", terry, 14:46
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", John A. Martin, 13:59
- My Council Election Platform, Chuck Mead, 13:51
- Poll on Organizing the Council, Koen Martens, 13:47
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 13:32
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:18
- RE: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 12:02
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 11:56
- Prefer all these polls and elections on another channel., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 10:48
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Paul Ficinski, 10:21
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Boyd Lynn Gerber, 09:36
- Campaign: If elected I will..., Julian Mehnle, 08:29
- Re: Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 08:10
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council" - acceptance deadline, jpinkerton, 08:10
- Re: Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 08:07
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:55
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:40
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council" (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 07:27
- Fw: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 07:26
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 07:23
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, administrator, 07:18
- Campaign: If elected I will, terry, 06:58
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 05:33
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 02:26
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Guy, 01:27
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Marc Kool, 01:19
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 01:09
November 13, 2004
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 23:57
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 23:07
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 22:56
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 22:40
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 22:08
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 21:47
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:55
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 20:11
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Julian Mehnle, 19:24
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, william(at)elan.net, 19:14
- Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 18:42
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 18:18
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Guy, 17:11
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, administrator, 16:42
- RE: Poll on Organizing the Council, terry, 16:41
- Re: who should be able to vote?, jpinkerton, 15:14
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Greg Connor, 15:03
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Douglas K. Fischer, 14:24
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Seth Goodman, 14:13
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark Shewmaker, 14:02
- Re: who should be able to vote?, Frank Ellermann, 13:16
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:50
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:31
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, wayne, 12:14
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 11:56
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark C. Langston, 11:37
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Greg Connor, 11:36
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Meng Weng Wong, 11:27
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Meng Weng Wong, 11:24
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, Frank Ellermann, 11:17
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:06
- Re: Poll on Organizing the Council, csm, 11:06
- Poll on Organizing the Council, william(at)elan.net, 10:43
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 10:40
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 09:02
- Re: who should be able to vote?, John A. Martin, 08:54
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, terry, 07:45
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 05:40
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 03:18
- RE: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 01:19
November 12, 2004
- RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 19:59
- RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:48
- Re: who should be able to vote?, jdoupe+spf, 18:31
- Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 18:26
- Re: who should be able to vote?, Shane Rush, 16:15
- RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 15:58
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Guy, 15:55
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 15:54
- Re: who should be able to vote?, wayne, 15:52
- Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 15:48
- RE: who should be able to vote?, guy, 15:39
- Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 15:34
- Re: who should be able to vote?, william(at)elan.net, 15:29
- Re: who should be able to vote?, Shane Rush, 15:28
- Re: who should be able to vote?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:25
- RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Seth Goodman, 15:20
- Re: who should be able to vote?, jpinkerton, 15:13
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, william(at)elan.net, 15:07
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Guy, 14:18
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, jpinkerton, 14:06
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, william(at)elan.net, 13:42
- RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please acceptor decline, william(at)elan.net, 13:21
- Re: who should be able to vote?, Philip Larkin Waters, 13:15
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, jpinkerton, 13:14
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:13
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 12:39
- Re: who should be able to vote?, wayne, 12:32
- RE: who should be able to vote?, Scott Kitterman, 12:21
- who should be able to vote?, wayne, 12:12
- Re: Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, csm, 12:07
- Re: Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, jpinkerton, 11:57
- Nomination that was previously omitted (silly of us actually)!, csm, 11:46
- Which route to take?, csm, 11:31
- Re: include: enhancement suggestion, Greg Connor, 10:57
- Re: Odd Problem, Greg Connor, 10:41
- RE: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:05
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, jpinkerton, 10:01
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 09:53
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:49
- RE: include: enhancement suggestion, Scott Kitterman, 09:47
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Michael Hammer, 09:46
- include: enhancement suggestion, Commerco WebMaster, 09:35
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, csm, 09:35
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "S PF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 09:30
- Re: Accountable Messaging Standards Group, Dave Crocker, 09:26
- Re: Odd Problem, Commerco WebMaster, 09:13
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:06
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "S PF Leadership Council", Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:45
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 08:45
- Accountable Messaging Standards Group, csm, 08:44
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 08:39
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, csm, 08:33
- Re: Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, csm, 08:29
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:24
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:23
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:08
- Some discussion on legal form., csm, 07:38
- Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 07:28
- RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 07:25
- Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 07:23
- RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, csm, 07:22
- RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 07:22
- RE: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 07:19
- Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:14
- RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 07:09
- RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 07:04
- Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 06:59
- Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 06:52
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF L, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:48
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 06:42
- RE: Odd Problem, Scott Kitterman, 06:40
- RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, terry, 06:35
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 06:34
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 06:27
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leade, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 06:22
- RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please acceptor decline, terry, 06:16
- Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 05:39
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 04:52
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Roger Moser, 04:37
- Re: AOL testing., James Couzens, 04:17
- Re: AOL testing., wayne, 04:10
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:19
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Shevek, 03:00
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPFLeadership Council", Mark, 03:00
- RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Seth Goodman, 02:54
- RE: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark, 02:15
- Re: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 01:32
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 01:17
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, jpinkerton, 01:05
- RE: AOL testing., John Glube, 00:58
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, James Couzens, 00:45
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 00:45
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 00:41
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Greg Connor, 00:40
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 00:40
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 00:39
- Nomination Acceptance, James Couzens, 00:38
- Re: List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Greg Connor, 00:30
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 00:17
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 00:14
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 00:14
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 00:03
November 11, 2004
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Roger Moser, 23:53
- SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Roger Moser, 23:53
- John Glube's response to the Microsoft letter, wayne, 23:39
- AOL testing., wayne, 23:36
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 23:23
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Frank Ellermann, 23:02
- Re: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, william(at)elan.net, 22:46
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", william(at)elan.net, 21:39
- RE: SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:27
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 21:19
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 21:17
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:13
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 21:02
- SPF leadership council nominees: please accept or decline, wayne, 20:58
- RE: Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SP F, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:43
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 20:42
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:12
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, B. Johannessen, 19:15
- Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 18:35
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, James Couzens, 18:33
- Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, Andy Bakun, 18:19
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Greg Connor, 16:39
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 16:37
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 16:27
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:26
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:59
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:53
- Re: Re: CLEAR, william(at)elan.net, 15:50
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:45
- Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:13
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 14:20
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Roger Moser, 14:00
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, william(at)elan.net, 13:15
- Nominations, Koen Martens, 12:35
- Re: Odd Problem, Matt, 11:59
- Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, jpinkerton, 11:49
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, jpinkerton, 11:41
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, csm, 11:24
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 11:18
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 11:17
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 11:12
- Off list re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, John Glube, 11:11
- RE: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:57
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 10:43
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 10:42
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, jpinkerton, 10:31
- Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, wayne, 10:10
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 10:07
- Re: MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard - Not, jpinkerton, 09:55
- MS may have fixed their SenderID/SPF wizard, wayne, 08:48
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 08:40
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 08:25
- Re: Odd Problem, wayne, 08:06
- [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 07:15
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 06:10
- Re: Odd Problem, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:34
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 02:56
- Re: Odd Problem, James Couzens, 02:47
- Saw this on the way to work in a nearby cemetery.., James Couzens, 02:44
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 02:35
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 02:28
- Fw: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council" -- FOR Michael Weiner, jpinkerton, 02:07
- Yahoo Domain Keys - Standard?, Bruce Barnes, 01:55
- List of nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 01:17
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 01:12
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, william(at)elan.net, 00:53
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 00:46
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, David, 00:37
November 10, 2004
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 23:25
- RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Dave Crocker, 23:14
- RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, william(at)elan.net, 21:59
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 21:10
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 19:34
- Re: CLEAR, Frank Ellermann, 18:58
- Re: Reminder about meeting 6:30pm today, william(at)elan.net, 17:31
- Re: OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, Adrian Midgley, 17:10
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 16:44
- RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Mark, 16:32
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Michael Weiner, 16:22
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 16:16
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Michael Weiner, 16:10
- support web forum wording (Meng, read this), Koen Martens, 15:22
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", csm, 15:14
- Re: Odd Problem, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:53
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 14:31
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Meng Weng Wong, 14:16
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, wayne, 14:05
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Shane Rush, 13:40
- RE: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, Guy, 13:31
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, csm, 13:27
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Jeremy Pullicino, 13:02
- Re: About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, jpinkerton, 12:29
- About 15 minutes ago at the FTC summit, Meng said SRS sucks, guy, 12:21
- Odd Problem, Matt, 11:39
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Hannah Schroeter, 10:16
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 10:07
- Re: Meng's website, Hannah Schroeter, 10:03
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Hannah Schroeter, 09:59
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 09:55
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 09:50
- Re: CLEAR (was: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council"), william(at)elan.net, 09:45
- Re: OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, william(at)elan.net, 09:32
- Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Hannah Schroeter, 09:22
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Mark Shewmaker, 09:15
- CLEAR (was: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council"), Frank Ellermann, 09:15
- Reminder about meeting 6:30pm today, william(at)elan.net, 09:13
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Scott Kitterman, 09:12
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sitonthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 09:01
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", George Schlossnagle, 08:51
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 07:07
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Meng Weng Wong, 06:45
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Paul Ficinski, 06:08
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 04:37
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council" - chat., jpinkerton, 03:04
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Andriy G . Tereshchenko, 02:57
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Stefan Engelbert, 02:40
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", Stefan Engelbert, 02:29
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 02:19
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 00:48
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 00:38
- OpenSPF.org "main page" wording -- please pick apart, James, 00:28
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, william(at)elan.net, 00:24
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 00:24
November 09, 2004
- Microsoft claims the senderID license is free., Guy, 23:46
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Rene Barbier, 23:36
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 21:52
- RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., James, 21:43
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 20:07
- Re: spf position on sid for summit, Shane Rush, 18:09
- spf position on sid for summit, william(at)elan.net, 17:17
- Here is a nice one to add to the list when trying to convince people that SPF record publishing is OK., mholm, 17:06
- Re: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., Shane Rush, 14:57
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Shane Rush, 14:37
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Shane Rush, 14:23
- Re: SPF web site, Shane Rush, 14:12
- RE: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Seth Goodman, 13:54
- RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., Guy, 13:31
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Shane Rush, 13:15
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", wayne, 13:13
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 12:52
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 12:29
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Meng Weng Wong, 12:16
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 12:12
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:10
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit onthe "SPF Leadership Council", John Glube, 12:06
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, jpinkerton, 12:02
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, wayne, 11:17
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, David, 11:13
- RE: A Response to the Microsoft Letter ..., John Glube, 11:13
- Re: Typo on spf.pobox.com site, wayne, 11:07
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, James Couzens, 11:03
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Larry Smith, 10:57
- Re: SRS/SES mailing lists?, Tony Finch, 10:54
- Killer GROKLAW article -- references "OpenSPF" position, James Couzens, 10:54
- RE: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Mark, 10:53
- SRS/SES mailing lists?, Paul Iadonisi, 10:46
- RE: Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", terry, 10:44
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James Couzens, 10:21
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Larry Smith, 10:12
- RE: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James Couzens, 09:55
- Re: Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James Couzens, 09:33
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 09:15
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", Frank Ellermann, 08:52
- Re: SPF web site, Frank Ellermann, 08:10
- Typo on spf.pobox.com site, Roger Moser, 08:02
- Re: NOT refocusing on SRS, James, 07:43
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 07:40
- Re: Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", James, 07:36
- Re: NOT refocusing on SRS, Koen Martens, 07:35
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Holm, Mark, 07:34
- Re: SPF web site, James, 07:27
- Formal call for nominations for people to sit on the "SPF Leadership Council", jpinkerton, 07:01
- RE: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Mark, 06:46
- SPF web site, Koen Martens, 06:45
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, Frank Ellermann, 06:40
- Re: Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 06:34
- Pledge of agreement with SPF Community Position, James, 03:55
- Re[2]: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Chris Drake, 03:35
- OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Roger Moser, 03:31
- RE: OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Richard Bang, 03:15
- Hello, I've been moderated, James, 03:09
- OT: Encrypting Proxy question: What "MAIL FROM:" address is safe to use?, Chris Drake, 02:45
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 01:32
- Re: RULE ANNOUNCE: NO MORE JAMES VS. SHEVEK POSTS, James Couzens, 00:44
- Re: Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 00:34
- RULE ANNOUNCE: NO MORE JAMES VS. SHEVEK POSTS, Greg Connor, 00:32
- Re: Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 00:22
- Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 00:08
- Re: Meng's website, Frank Ellermann, 00:06
November 08, 2004
- Re: [SPF v1 Draft] Last chance before I submit..., Greg Connor, 23:57
- Pledge, Frank Ellermann, 23:54
- Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 23:53
- Attend the FTC Email Authentication Summit by phone, Guy, 23:52
- Re: Meng's website, James Couzens, 23:34
- NOT refocusing on SRS, James Couzens, 21:21
- Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 20:08
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, wayne, 19:20
- Re: web page on sender ID, mholm, 18:06
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Frank Ellermann, 17:22
- OT: PRA (was: Meeting in person next week), Frank Ellermann, 16:51
- Re: Meng's website, frank, 16:35
- Re: Meng's website, william(at)elan.net, 16:17
- Typo on spf.pobox.com site, James Couzens, 16:11
- Re: Meeting in person next week, william(at)elan.net, 16:01
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Koen Martens, 15:45
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, william(at)elan.net, 15:45
- Re: Action based on SPF Organization Poll, Jonathan Gardner, 14:35
- Re: An eweek article on MS and IP rights...., Jonathan Gardner, 14:01
- Re: Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 12:10
- An eweek article on MS and IP rights...., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 10:39
- Meng's website, jpinkerton, 10:09
- RE: Meeting in person next week, Dennis Dayman, 09:42
- Re: Meeting in person next week, Michael Hammer, 09:33
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 11/08/04, Wayne Schlitt, 06:23
- Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:35
- Action based on SPF Organization Poll, jpinkerton, 01:53
- RE: refocusing on SRS, Mark, 01:29
November 07, 2004
- Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 23:08
- Re: refocusing on SRS, Frank Ellermann, 20:53
- Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 19:51
- Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 18:38
- Re: web page on sender ID, mholm, 17:30
- refocusing on SRS, Meng Weng Wong, 15:39
- Re: Slides & stepping back, wayne, 14:09
- Re: Re: Slides & stepping back, jpinkerton, 13:50
- Re: Slides & stepping back, Frank Ellermann, 12:52
- Re: Re: Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 11:34
- Re: Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 11:02
- Re: Slides & stepping back, Frank Ellermann, 10:51
- Re: Slides & stepping back, James Couzens, 09:48
- Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 09:03
- Re: Slides & stepping back, Michael Weiner, 08:29
- Slides & stepping back, Koen Martens, 08:11
November 06, 2004
- Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 13:59
- Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 13:42
- Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 12:22
- Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 10:04
- Re: web page on sender ID, Roger Moser, 04:34
- Re: Re: web page on sender ID, Roger Moser, 00:45
November 05, 2004
- Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 22:24
- Re: Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 22:20
- Re: Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 22:15
- Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 22:14
- Re: Re: web page on sender ID, Nick Phillips, 19:54
- Re: Summary of SPF Organization Poll, Nick Phillips, 19:44
- Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 17:29
- Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 17:28
- Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 17:17
- Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 17:00
- Re: web page on sender ID, Michael Weiner, 16:58
- Re: Re: web page on sender ID, william(at)elan.net, 16:55
- Re: web page on sender ID, Holm, Mark, 16:54
- Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 16:45
- Meeting in person next week, william(at)elan.net, 16:30
- Re: web page on sender ID, Holm, Mark, 16:21
- Re: Meeting in person next week, James Couzens, 16:18
- Re: web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 16:16
- RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:01
- web page on sender ID, James Couzens, 14:47
- Re: web page on sender ID, Hector Santos, 14:19
- Summary of SPF Organization Poll, william(at)elan.net, 14:06
- Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 13:41
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:20
- RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:17
- Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 12:00
- Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 11:50
- Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 11:45
- RE: Re: [OT] HTML rant, Guy, 11:28
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 11:27
- Re: web page on sender ID, Alan Hodgson, 11:07
- Re: web page on sender ID, wayne, 10:58
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 10:49
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Frank Ellermann, 10:36
- Re: Re: [OT] HTML rant, jpinkerton, 10:15
- Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 09:48
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Brian Barrios, 09:31
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Richard Bang, 09:27
- Re: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, wayne, 09:23
- Re: [OT] HTML rant, Frank Ellermann, 09:22
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 09:16
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:05
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 09:02
- Re: web page on sender ID, Frank Ellermann, 08:44
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Brian Barrios, 07:35
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Hector Santos, 05:02
- Re: web page on sender ID, Koen Martens, 00:33
- SPF Organization Poll - List of All Answers (UPDATED, FINAL), william(at)elan.net, 00:06
November 04, 2004
- web page on sender ID, Meng Weng Wong, 23:42
- RE: A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Raymond Neeves, 20:15
- Re: Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, william(at)elan.net, 18:00
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Roger Moser, 15:05
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 14:58
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., william(at)elan.net, 14:40
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Roger Moser, 14:16
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Koen Martens, 14:08
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 14:06
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 13:23
- Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Koen Martens, 13:13
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 13:11
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., jdoupe+spf, 13:09
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 12:47
- A Cautionary Tale concerning AOL, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:30
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 12:26
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 12:11
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 12:09
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., wayne, 12:06
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 12:02
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Brian Barrios, 11:59
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., jdoupe+spf, 11:17
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 10:11
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 09:53
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., M Z R, 09:26
- Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 09:14
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Peter Bowyer, 08:45
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stefan Engelbert, 08:33
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Frank Ellermann, 08:26
- RE: new SES draft available for comment, Seth Goodman, 05:17
- Re: new SES draft available for comment, Michael Weiner, 04:50
- new SES draft available for comment, Seth Goodman, 04:38
- Re: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Peter Bowyer, 03:50
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Stefan Engelbert, 03:36
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:34
- RE: Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stefan Engelbert, 02:58
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail., Stephane Bortzmeyer, 02:50
- Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 01:56
- Re: Re: accredit= submodifier, Meng Weng Wong, 01:05
- SPF Organization Poll - List of All Answers, william(at)elan.net, 00:58
- Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Meng Weng Wong, 00:57
- Re: SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 00:17
- comments on - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), jpinkerton, 00:10
November 03, 2004
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, wayne, 22:10
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Mark, 21:32
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, Michael Weiner, 20:03
- MEDIA: Revised Sender ID does not impress Apache, Debian, william(at)elan.net, 20:00
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 19:35
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 17:58
- Re: v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, Michael Weiner, 17:35
- v=spf1 include:spf-a.hotmail.com include:spf-b.hotmail.com ~all, mholm, 17:20
- RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Seth Goodman, 17:06
- Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 16:27
- Re: accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 16:00
- [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Jon Bertrand, 15:24
- Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, wayne, 15:17
- RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:01
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:52
- RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, william(at)elan.net, 13:46
- RE: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Su mmit, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:53
- Re: Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, wayne, 11:30
- RE: accredit= submodifier, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:29
- RE: accredit= submodifier, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:25
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 10:09
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 08:24
- Re: Re: Redirected Trace header draft, william(at)elan.net, 08:04
- Re: Agenda for FTC/NIST Email Authentication Summit, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:00
- RE: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, MW Mike Weiner (5028), 07:13
- RE: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), terry, 06:14
- Re: draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, James Couzens, 05:31
- draft-schlitt-spf-00pre4 now available, wayne, 01:35
- Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), jpinkerton, 00:11
- Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), jpinkerton, 00:07
November 02, 2004
- Re: [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), James Couzens, 21:26
- Re: accredit= submodifier, Meng Weng Wong, 21:12
- accredit= submodifier, Frank Ellermann, 18:06
- Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, william(at)elan.net, 16:55
- Re: Has SRS been published as Internet Draft, wayne, 16:51
- Re: Redirected Trace header draft, Frank Ellermann, 16:37
- [OT] HTML rant (was: Moved to SES-DEVEL list), Frank Ellermann, 15:24
- Redirected Trace header draft (was Processed-By or Transmitted-By header concept), william(at)elan.net, 14:49
- SPF-DISCUSS Mail Summary Report, winserver . support, 14:49
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 13:42
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Hannah Schroeter, 13:29
- Re: SPF for Dummies..., Commerco WebMaster, 12:46
- Re: SPF for Dummies..., jpinkerton, 12:21
- SPF for Dummies..., Andrew W . Donoho, 12:05
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Jeff Macdonald, 11:33
- Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, william(at)elan.net, 10:46
- Re: SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list onfuture of SPF Community (fwd), Peter Bowyer, 10:25
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Hannah Schroeter, 08:33
- SPF Organization Poll - Questions to ALL particpants on the list on future of SPF Community (fwd), william(at)elan.net, 08:25
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Jeff Macdonald, 08:12
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Mark Shewmaker, 06:18
- Please Pause [was Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax], Hector Santos, 04:21
- Re: Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, James Couzens, 03:38
November 01, 2004
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 23:22
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Greg Connor, 21:39
- Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, wayne, 21:12
- Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 21:09
- RE: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Scott Kitterman, 20:46
- Re: DomainKeys vs IIM, william(at)elan.net, 18:50
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Meng Weng Wong, 18:28
- DomainKeys vs IIM, Meng Weng Wong, 18:26
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 16:17
- RE: purely dual-format approach, terry, 15:53
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Anne P. Mitchell, Esq. <amitchell(_at_)isipp(_dot_)com>, 14:38
- purely dual-format approach, Roger Moser, 14:34
- Re: Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 13:35
- FW: draft-lyon-senderid-pra-00, guy, 13:22
- FW: draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, guy, 13:22
- FW: draft-katz-submitter-00, guy, 13:22
- RE: purely dual-format approach, Richard Bang, 11:40
- Re: purely dual-format approach, wayne, 11:17
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Frank Ellermann, 10:27
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascopingsyntax, Mark Shewmaker, 10:00
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Andrew W . Donoho, 09:40
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascopingsyntax, Richard Bang, 09:39
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 09:31
- RE: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as ascoping syntax, Richard Bang, 08:23
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Koen Martens, 07:50
- Re: Using "v=spf1/scope1,scope2,scope3 " as a scoping syntax, Mark Shewmaker, 07:32
- Re: Moved to SES-DEVEL list, Frank Ellermann, 06:08
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Mark Shewmaker, 05:55
- Re: Yet another poll: SenderID/PRA topics, Hector Santos, 03:49
- Re: A delightfully novel idea, Frank Ellermann, 02:27
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 02:08
- RE: purely dual-format approach, Richard Bang, 01:41
- New op= proposal (was p=, "pra" added), Frank Ellermann, 01:40
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 01:38
- Re: purely dual-format approach, Frank Ellermann, 01:01
- Weekly SPF discussion mailinglist stats for 11/01/04, Wayne Schlitt, 00:27
- Re: I hate to interrupt all this for something practical, but.... we need a concise, easy-to-follow set of SPF instructions in file format - anyone able to help?, Graham Murray, 00:09