spf-discuss
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IETF] Allocation of the new RR type for SPF

2004-11-11 21:17:51
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004, James Couzens spewed into the bitstream:

JC>On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 13:24 -0500, csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com wrote:
JC>
JC>> I don't want to come across as overly critical or even negative here but 
JC>> I really have to say this... as we look at possible architectures can we 
JC>> please, PLEASE not turn the phone book into a lead weight... it's 
JC>> already big enough and it does it's job pretty well... making it a 
JC>> parsing engine as well seems to me to be the wrong approach. Can we just 
JC>> ask it to print our new entries and nothing more? :-)
JC>> 
JC>> NB. This would also serve to minimize the impact on existing 
JC>> infrastructure which is most definitely "a good thing" <tm>.
JC>
JC>
JC>I'd like to nominate this chap for the new SPF council.  He's absolutely
JC>brilliant.  Someone please second this nomination.

Sheesh... /me blushes... :-)

- -- 
Chuck Mead <csm(_at_)redhat(_dot_)com>
Instructor II (and resident Postfix bigot), GLS
Disclaimer: "It's Thursday and my name is Locutus of B0rk!"
Addendum: "Bwahahaha! Fire up the orbital mind-control lasers!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBlDlzZfy0juH51WsRAoagAJ4mVI2IhcF9Vg2xPiUD8sd/a6Hk+ACgnSH0
jop9MwBqeGAQcNQmRRtS8EA=
=AyHP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----