SPF Discuss (date)
June 30, 2005
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:49
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:34
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 17:18
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 16:36
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:04
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:49
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:47
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 15:00
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Mark Shewmaker, 14:47
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, David MacQuigg, 13:54
- Re: Border Appliances, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:06
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:01
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 12:38
- Re: Back to the future (email path authentication in 1975), Frank Ellermann, 10:12
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, David MacQuigg, 09:30
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Scott Kitterman, 08:07
- Re: Border Appliances, Daniel Taylor, 06:08
- Re: Back to the future (email path authentication in 1975), Commerco WebMaster, 05:15
- Back to the future (email path authentication in 1975), william(at)elan.net, 04:48
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:46
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 01:17
- Re: Border Appliances, Hector Santos, 01:14
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, johnp, 00:09
June 29, 2005
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, David MacQuigg, 23:13
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, william(at)elan.net, 22:31
- Re: Sender ID "embraces and extends" SPF, according to Microsoft, Jason Gurtz, 22:05
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, wayne, 19:45
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Frank Ellermann, 19:38
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Scott Kitterman, 19:31
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, wayne, 19:29
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, william(at)elan.net, 19:18
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Frank Ellermann, 19:12
- Re: Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, wayne, 19:07
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, Frank Ellermann, 19:00
- Re: Response to IETF actions?, Frank Ellermann, 18:36
- Re: SenderID and the web site..., wayne, 18:23
- Re: Response to IETF actions?, william(at)elan.net, 18:20
- Sender ID "embraces and extends" SPF, according to Microsoft, wayne, 18:16
- Re: Response to IETF actions?, Frank Ellermann, 18:15
- Re: Response to IETF actions?, wayne, 18:08
- Re: Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, David MacQuigg, 17:59
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, Greg Connor, 17:56
- Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Results, Julian Mehnle, 17:46
- Re: Response to IETF actions?, Greg Connor, 17:46
- Response to IETF actions?, william(at)elan.net, 17:13
- Re: Role of SPF in fighting spam, Frank Ellermann, 17:00
- Re: SPF and Webmin, william(at)elan.net, 16:39
- Role of SPF in fighting spam, David MacQuigg, 16:00
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Scott Kitterman, 15:41
- Re: SPF and Webmin, johnp, 15:30
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Scott Kitterman, 14:53
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Scott Kitterman, 14:49
- Re: SPF and Webmin, johnp, 14:13
- Re: SPF and Webmin, Meng Weng Wong, 14:05
- [Fwd: Document Action: 'Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in E-MAIL, version 1' to Experimental RFC], Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- SPF and Webmin, John Hinton, 13:30
- Re: Border Appliances, johnp, 12:31
- RE: Border Appliances, Scott Kitterman, 11:46
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, David MacQuigg, 11:41
- Re: Border Appliances, David MacQuigg, 11:38
- SenderID and the web site..., Scott Kitterman, 06:24
June 28, 2005
- Re: SPF and SenderID, Arjen de Korte, 23:28
- Re: SPF and SenderID, Frank Ellermann, 23:24
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, Greg Connor, 23:11
- Re: Border Appliances, Greg Connor, 22:27
- Re: SPF and SenderID, wayne, 21:52
- SPF and SenderID, Craig Whitmore, 21:33
- Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Vote now! (Reminder), Julian Mehnle, 17:27
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- RE: HUMOR: one fine spf record at microsoft subsidiary, Scott Kitterman, 13:01
- HUMOR: one fine spf record at microsoft subsidiary, william(at)elan.net, 12:59
- Re: A regular expression that matches SPF records, Jason Gurtz, 12:53
- Re: A regular expression that matches SPF records, Frank Ellermann, 10:42
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Frank Ellermann, 10:32
- Re: Border Appliances, David MacQuigg, 10:27
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:43
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, Daniel Taylor, 08:39
- Re: Website - explain all, Daniel Taylor, 08:35
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, David MacQuigg, 08:19
- Website - explain all, John Hinton, 08:04
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, wayne, 06:03
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, william(at)elan.net, 05:59
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 05:32
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, william(at)elan.net, 05:24
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 04:55
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 04:43
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 04:24
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Jeroen Massar, 03:16
- Re: FWD: The IETF has accepted the SPF specification for RFC status!, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 01:19
June 27, 2005
- Re: A regular expression that matches SPF records, wayne, 23:14
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, wayne, 23:08
- Re: A regular expression that matches SPF records, william(at)elan.net, 23:08
- A regular expression that matches SPF records, wayne, 22:53
- Re: Turning raw data into useful stats, william(at)elan.net, 22:32
- Turning raw data into useful stats, Greg Connor, 22:15
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Frank Ellermann, 18:33
- Re: Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, wayne, 17:35
- Re: Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, william(at)elan.net, 16:14
- Re: FWD: The IETF has accepted the SPF specification for RFC status!, Frank Ellermann, 16:00
- Re: IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Frank Ellermann, 15:54
- Re: FWD: The IETF has accepted the SPF specification for RFC status!, Julian Mehnle, 14:43
- Re: Report from the MAAWG conference (was: Going to the MAAWG conference), Hector Santos, 09:54
- IPv4/IPv6 address handling in the SPF specification, Julian Mehnle, 09:00
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 06:31
- Re: Next strategic steps for SPF, David MacQuigg, 06:29
- Re: Next strategic steps for SPF, DNI Support Department, 05:09
- Next strategic steps for SPF, Chris Haynes, 04:28
- Re: Microsoft and the SPF community (Was: Report from the MAAWG conference), johnp, 02:19
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, johnp, 02:04
- Re: Report from the MAAWG conference, Frank Ellermann, 01:22
- Re: CIVS Election now available for voting: SPF Project Community Vote: Official Project Domains, johnp, 00:12
June 26, 2005
- Microsoft and the SPF community (Was: Report from the MAAWG conference), wayne, 21:13
- Re: Bad problem with SPF wizard..., wayne, 20:48
- Report from the MAAWG conference (was: Going to the MAAWG conference), Julian Mehnle, 20:43
- Re: Bad problem with SPF wizard..., Scott Kitterman, 20:42
- Re: Bad problem with SPF wizard..., wayne, 20:21
- Bad problem with SPF wizard..., Scott Kitterman, 19:27
- status of godaddy and SPF records, wayne, 18:13
- Community Vote: Official Project Domains -- Vote has opened!, Julian Mehnle, 17:17
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:27
- Re: Summary of SenderID/PRA Concerns and Benefits (draft 2), Hector Santos, 15:54
- Updated draft-spf-6-3-options-07, Frank Ellermann, 15:32
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 14:48
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 14:37
- Re: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), william(at)elan.net, 14:09
- Re: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), william(at)elan.net, 13:58
- Re: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), johnp, 13:19
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, David Woodhouse, 12:29
- Re: Summary of SenderID/PRA Concerns and Benefits (draft 2), wayne, 11:53
- Webmaster Assistant., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 11:36
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 11:28
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains (Reminder), Julian Mehnle, 11:06
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 11:02
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Shane Rush, 10:48
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains (Reminder), Commerco WebMaster, 10:31
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 09:54
- Community Vote: Official Project Domains (Reminder), Julian Mehnle, 09:14
- Re: Summary of SenderID/PRA Concerns and Benefits (draft 2), Stuart D. Gathman, 06:56
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Ralf Doeblitz, 01:41
June 25, 2005
- status report (was: enough with the web site), Frank Ellermann, 09:44
- Re: Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 09:38
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, Meng Weng Wong, 09:16
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Frank Ellermann, 08:37
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Dave Crocker, 08:23
- Summary of SenderID/PRA Concerns and Benefits (draft 2), Hector Santos, 06:34
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, wayne, 06:26
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Hector Santos, 06:25
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, wayne, 06:17
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, johnp, 06:13
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, william(at)elan.net, 06:04
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, Chuck Mead, 05:53
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, wayne, 05:51
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, william(at)elan.net, 05:42
- Re: Re: enough with the web site, Chuck Mead, 05:29
- Re: Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 03:36
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 02:37
June 24, 2005
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Stuart D. Gathman, 23:36
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Hector Santos, 22:46
- Re: enough with the web site, Frank Ellermann, 22:12
- slashdot story about SPF/SID RFC advancement, wayne, 20:59
- FWD: The IETF has accepted the SPF specification for RFC status!, wayne, 20:57
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name, Daniel Taylor, 20:41
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Jeff Macdonald, 19:32
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Frank Ellermann, 18:30
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Jeff Macdonald, 18:29
- Re: SPF-classic I-D was approved by the IESG, Frank Ellermann, 18:12
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Frank Ellermann, 17:25
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Frank Ellermann, 16:58
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, william(at)elan.net, 16:11
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, David Woodhouse, 15:51
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:50
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:37
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Ralf Doeblitz, 15:36
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Tony Finch, 15:19
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Hector Santos, 15:01
- Re: RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:03
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Dave Crocker, 13:32
- Re: enough with the web site, Chuck Mead, 12:56
- RFC (request for comments): Summary of SenderID/PRA concerns, Hector Santos, 12:56
- enough with the web site, Chuck Mead, 12:41
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 12:33
- A comedy of errors, John A. Martin, 12:33
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, johnp, 12:16
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 12:08
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 11:34
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, David Woodhouse, 11:12
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Ralf Doeblitz, 11:09
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, David Woodhouse, 11:07
- Re: Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Hector Santos, 09:15
- Re: SPF-classic I-D was approved by the IESG, william(at)elan.net, 08:34
- SPF-classic I-D was approved by the IESG, wayne, 08:18
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 07:42
- Re: Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 07:36
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 07:31
- Re: Problem with SID, John Capo, 07:27
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 06:46
- Re: FTC 20 questions, Michael Hammer, 06:40
- MAIL FROM rewriting?, Julius Hibbert, 06:06
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 05:58
- RE: Problem with SID, Gabor Tokaji, 05:43
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 05:43
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 05:35
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 05:31
- RE: Problem with SID, Gabor Tokaji, 05:28
- Re: Problem with SID, wayne, 05:22
- Re: FTC 20 questions, wayne, 05:07
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, wayne, 05:05
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Scott Kitterman, 04:56
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 04:54
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Chuck Mead, 04:35
- Re: FTC 20 questions, Hector Santos, 04:04
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, william(at)elan.net, 02:36
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, David Woodhouse, 02:31
- RE: Problem with SID, Gabor Tokaji, 02:25
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:17
- RE: Problem with SID, Gabor Tokaji, 02:03
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:01
- RE: Problem with SID, Gabor Tokaji, 01:11
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Henning Hucke, 01:06
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:43
- FTC 20 questions, johnp, 00:42
June 23, 2005
- Re: Problem with SID, william(at)elan.net, 23:45
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Ralf Doeblitz, 23:13
- Re: Problem with SID, Graham Murray, 23:10
- Re: Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Hector Santos, 21:22
- Re: Re: IESG update, wayne, 21:12
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Frank Ellermann, 21:05
- Re: IESG update, Frank Ellermann, 20:58
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Hector Santos, 20:54
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, Frank Ellermann, 20:40
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 19:55
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 19:23
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 19:12
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 19:08
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 18:37
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, william(at)elan.net, 17:13
- Re: IESG update, william(at)elan.net, 16:50
- Re: Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, wayne, 16:35
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Frank Ellermann, 16:07
- IESG update, wayne, 16:06
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:25
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:12
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, wayne, 15:07
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, jeremy+spf, 14:56
- Andy Newton says: FTC Dismisses SPF, wayne, 14:50
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, wayne, 14:46
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 14:29
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 13:58
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 13:52
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Jeff Macdonald, 13:15
- Re: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Hector Santos, 13:06
- Re: Problem with SID, Roger B.A. Klorese , 13:02
- Re: Problem with SID, Roger B.A. Klorese , 12:58
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:53
- Re: Problem with SID, Frank Ellermann, 12:50
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 12:50
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 12:31
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 12:18
- Re: false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 12:13
- Re: Problem with SID, Roger B.A. Klorese , 12:05
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 11:52
- RE: DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, Scott Kitterman, 11:51
- Re: Problem with SID, Roger B.A. Klorese , 11:28
- Re: Re: false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, Jeff Macdonald, 11:00
- Re: false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 10:53
- Re: Re: false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, william(at)elan.net, 09:19
- Re: Trying to Understand SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:15
- Re: false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, Frank Ellermann, 09:07
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 08:50
- false failure at MSN/Hotmail with Sender-ID, Jeff Macdonald, 08:45
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 08:42
- Re: Trying to Understand SPF, Terry Fielder, 08:28
- Trying to Understand SPF, info, 08:17
- Re: Problem with SID, Roger B.A. Klorese , 08:16
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 07:58
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 07:51
- Re: Problem with SID, Bruce Barnes, 07:51
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 07:43
- Re: Who's Using SPF, Hector Santos, 07:12
- Who's Using SPF, Michael . Phillips, 07:05
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Marc Chametzky, 07:04
- Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 06:58
- Re: Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 06:51
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 06:18
- RE: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Scott Kitterman, 05:41
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 05:35
June 22, 2005
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:44
- Re: Problem with SID, Scott Kitterman, 21:18
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:06
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 20:55
- Re: Problem with SID, jeremy+spf, 20:39
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 20:09
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 19:48
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 18:12
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 17:31
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:31
- Re: Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Paul Ficinski, 15:15
- Re: Problem with SID, Dick St.Peters, 15:12
- Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Frank Ellermann, 13:16
- Re: Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Terry Fielder, 12:46
- Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Frank Ellermann, 12:29
- Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Terry Fielder, 11:44
- Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:33
- Re: Achilles heel of SPF, Scott Kitterman, 11:07
- Achilles heel of SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:24
- Re: Problem with SID, Frank Ellermann, 10:00
- Re: Problem with SID, Frank Ellermann, 09:14
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:13
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:06
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Jeff Macdonald, 08:06
- DM News says: MSN requires Sender ID Authentication, wayne, 07:46
- 10 things you should know about Sender Policy Framework posted on TECH REPUBLIC, Bruce Barnes, 05:59
- Re: Problem with SID, Terry Fielder, 05:02
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, william(at)elan.net, 04:40
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 03:54
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Jeremy Harris, 03:26
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 02:31
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 00:15
June 21, 2005
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 22:40
- Re: Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:27
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 22:21
- Re: SPF: Some Problems to Face but Seems Pretty Fair, Hector Santos, 22:17
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:52
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 21:50
- SPF: Some Problems to Face but Seems Pretty Fair, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 21:19
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 20:23
- Re: Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 19:54
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 19:44
- Re: Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:16
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Frank Ellermann, 15:46
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:52
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:40
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, william(at)elan.net, 14:40
- Re: Problem with SID, Frank Ellermann, 14:37
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 13:40
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Jeff Macdonald, 10:35
- Re: Re: Problem with SID, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:38
- Re: Problem with SID, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:31
- Re: Problem with SID, Frank Ellermann, 07:31
- Re: Problem with SID, Hector Santos, 05:08
- Problem with SID, David MacQuigg, 04:37
June 20, 2005
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Frank Ellermann, 14:20
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Frank Ellermann, 14:04
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 13:51
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Ralf Doeblitz, 11:43
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Mark Shewmaker, 11:03
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, johnp, 10:53
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, wayne, 10:44
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, johnp, 10:36
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, wayne, 10:30
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Terry Fielder, 10:23
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Terry Fielder, 10:15
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, wayne, 08:45
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Hector Santos, 08:37
- RE: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Kelly, Michael, 08:24
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Hector Santos, 08:15
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, jeremy+spf, 08:02
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, David Sowder, 07:46
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Hector Santos, 07:24
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Scott Kitterman, 06:52
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name, johnp, 02:10
- Re: Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 02:08
- Re: OpenSPF.org domain name still available for this project..., johnp, 00:28
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 00:27
June 19, 2005
- Re: OpenSPF.org domain name still available for this project..., Michael Weiner, 20:47
- OpenSPF.org domain name still available for this project..., James Couzens, 20:26
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Hector Santos, 20:05
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, wayne, 19:39
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Chris Haynes, 18:27
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Frank Ellermann, 17:58
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:34
- Re: Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, wayne, 17:32
- Re: Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Frank Ellermann, 17:29
- Re: Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:25
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Frank Ellermann, 17:14
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, william(at)elan.net, 16:27
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 16:06
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, william(at)elan.net, 15:59
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, wayne, 15:52
- Re: Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, Adrian Midgley, 15:50
- Hotmail preparing to check SID with spf2.0/pra only?, william(at)elan.net, 15:30
- Community Vote: Official Project Domains, Julian Mehnle, 15:28
- ETHICS, Hector Santos, 12:40
- Re: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), william(at)elan.net, 10:42
- Re: Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 10:06
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Frank Ellermann, 09:53
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Scott Kitterman, 08:40
- Re: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), Hector Santos, 06:34
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, johnp, 05:32
- Re: Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., wayne, 04:32
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Michael Weiner, 04:26
- Re: Going to the MAAWG conference, Julian Mehnle, 02:46
- Re: Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 01:20
June 18, 2005
- Re: Going to the MAAWG conference, Frank Ellermann, 21:42
- RE: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), Bruce Barnes, 19:53
- RE: Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), Spam, 19:53
- Engineering, Politics and Internet and how it relates to SPF (SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going), william(at)elan.net, 19:26
- Going to the MAAWG conference, Julian Mehnle, 18:34
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 18:31
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., william(at)elan.net, 16:25
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Frank Ellermann, 16:24
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 16:18
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 16:04
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., william(at)elan.net, 15:25
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 15:12
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Hector Santos, 15:00
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Frank Ellermann, 13:28
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., jeremy+spf, 13:16
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Frank Ellermann, 12:42
- Re: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 12:42
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Frank Ellermann, 12:33
- Re: Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 11:55
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Frank Ellermann, 11:27
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Frank Ellermann, 11:05
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, johnp, 11:00
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 10:48
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, Lou Katz, 10:02
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:01
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Julian Mehnle, 09:28
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, johnp, 09:00
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, william(at)elan.net, 08:47
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 08:41
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, Julian Mehnle, 08:28
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 07:19
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 07:12
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 07:09
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Julian Mehnle, 07:09
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, wayne, 07:00
- Re: Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, william(at)elan.net, 06:58
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 06:43
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 06:34
- Council: Choosing a SPF domain name trustee, Julian Mehnle, 06:32
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Julian Mehnle, 06:21
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 05:16
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 04:30
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Julian Mehnle, 04:03
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., wayne, 03:29
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 03:03
- RE: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., william(at)elan.net, 01:34
- Re: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., johnp, 01:25
- RE: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 01:16
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 01:13
- RE: SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Scott Kitterman, 00:23
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 00:13
- SPF 2/3 maybe it is time to get this going., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 00:13
June 17, 2005
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 23:51
- RE: Re: Inconsistency?, Gabor Tokaji, 15:56
- RE: Re: Inconsistency?, Gabor Tokaji, 15:54
- Re: Re: Inconsistency?, Hector Santos, 15:52
- Re: Re: Inconsistency?, Mark Shewmaker, 15:32
- Re: Inconsistency?, Commerco WebMaster, 15:26
- RE: Re: Inconsistency?, Gabor Tokaji, 15:20
- Re: Inconsistency?, Frank Ellermann, 15:12
- Inconsistency?, Gabor Tokaji, 15:01
June 16, 2005
- Re: IETF datatracker updates, Frank Ellermann, 18:59
- Re: IETF datatracker updates, william(at)elan.net, 17:33
- Re: Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM173656238V58209L0KM), wayne, 16:50
- Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM173675298V65654L0KM), eBay Customer Support, 16:48
- Re: IETF datatracker updates, wayne, 16:46
- Re: IETF datatracker updates, william(at)elan.net, 16:05
- Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM173668220V62878L0KM), eBay Customer Support, 16:01
- IETF datatracker updates, william(at)elan.net, 15:59
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Frank Ellermann, 14:49
- Your message to support(_at_)ebay(_dot_)com was not received (KMM173656238V58209L0KM), eBay Customer Support, 14:43
- Re: website beta testers, Frank Ellermann, 14:38
- Re: SPF and SenderID, Ted Hardie, 14:27
- Re: SPF and SenderID - for your comments Chuck, johnp, 13:24
- Re: SPF and SenderID, william(at)elan.net, 12:47
- SPF Web site, Stuart D. Gathman, 11:29
- full definition of all switch, Kelly, Michael, 11:24
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 10:28
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 09:01
- RE: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Mark Jeftovic, 07:42
- RE: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Scott Kitterman, 07:34
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Julian Mehnle, 07:25
- Re: website beta testers, Chuck Mead, 07:13
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 07:11
- RE: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Scott Kitterman, 07:09
- RE: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, Scott Kitterman, 07:06
- RE: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, Scott Kitterman, 06:47
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 06:44
- Re: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, wayne, 06:39
- Re: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, Daniel Taylor, 06:27
June 15, 2005
- Re: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, Scott Kitterman, 20:59
- Re: spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, Stuart D. Gathman, 17:34
- spf.pobox.com hosting has been switched, wayne, 16:13
- Re: IESG intends to publish conflicting RfCs causing loss of legit e-mails, Frank Ellermann, 10:01
- Re: website beta testers, Frank Ellermann, 09:27
- Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, Frank Ellermann, 09:13
- Re: copyright for new website, Julian Mehnle, 04:53
- Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, wayne, 04:29
- Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, Julian Mehnle, 04:05
June 14, 2005
- Re: Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, william(at)elan.net, 21:13
- Re: Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, wayne, 20:36
- Re: agenda item: copyright for new website, Scott Kitterman, 20:11
- Re: website beta testers, Terry Fielder, 20:07
- RE: website beta testers, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:17
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 12:23
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 09:49
- Re: IESG intends to publish conflicting RfCs causing loss of legit e-mails, Julian Mehnle, 09:38
June 13, 2005
- Re: IESG intends to publish conflicting RfCs causing loss of legit e-mails, Frank Ellermann, 19:05
- Re: IESG intends to publish conflicting RfCs causing loss of legit e-mails, william(at)elan.net, 17:52
- remark from a user, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:49
- Re: significant events, Frank Ellermann, 17:21
- Re: significant events, william(at)elan.net, 16:43
- Re: significant events, Frank Ellermann, 16:42
- Re: significant events, wayne, 15:13
- significant events, Chuck Mead, 14:54
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 09:17
- authorization vs authentication, HELO checking, header-from scope, exp i28n, Oh my!, wayne, 09:07
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 05:39
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 03:46
June 12, 2005
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 23:03
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 22:23
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 15:28
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., william(at)elan.net, 11:46
- Re: This is ridiculous., william(at)elan.net, 10:06
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 09:12
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 08:45
- Re: This is ridiculous., David MacQuigg, 07:35
- RE: hosting services for the official SPF website, Bruce Onder, 07:33
- list of people on the IETF DEA directorate published, wayne, 02:50
June 11, 2005
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 23:54
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 21:21
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 20:38
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 15:05
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 12:24
- SPF web site suggestion, Scott Kitterman, 12:06
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 10:20
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 10:13
- Re: Internationalisation of the spf web site, Koen Martens, 10:03
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Koen Martens, 09:59
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Koen Martens, 09:52
- Re: website beta testers, Koen Martens, 09:46
- Re: Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, wayne, 06:49
- RE: Re: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 03:05
June 10, 2005
- RE: WebSTAR 4.2, Jay Salsburg, 17:05
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 16:36
- Re: nullMX, VARA, op=trusted, Frank Ellermann, 16:26
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 16:03
- Re: Re: Paper on Path and Cryptographic Authentication Technologies, william(at)elan.net, 15:45
- Re: Paper on Path and Cryptographic Authentication Technologies, Frank Ellermann, 15:25
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, wayne, 14:40
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Bill Taroli, 14:11
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 12:44
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, wayne, 12:21
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Mark Shewmaker, 11:21
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, william(at)elan.net, 10:59
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Daniel Taylor, 10:40
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 10:39
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 10:23
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 10:17
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Fred Laxton, 10:14
- RE: agenda items for the next SPF council meeting, Scott Kitterman, 10:13
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 09:49
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, wayne, 09:47
- Re: hosting services for the official SPF website, Fred Laxton, 09:36
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Commerco WebMaster, 08:51
- Paper on Path and Cryptographic Authentication Technologies, william(at)elan.net, 08:21
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 07:24
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 07:20
- hosting services for the official SPF website, wayne, 07:03
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 06:58
- Re: Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, wayne, 06:47
- Solicitation for a Webmaster for the official SPF website, Julian Mehnle, 06:23
- Re: website beta testers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:54
- Re: website beta testers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:45
- Re: website beta testers, wayne, 05:40
- RE: WebSTAR 4.2, Scott Kitterman, 05:32
- Re: website beta testers, Julian Mehnle, 05:26
- Re: website beta testers, Julian Mehnle, 05:12
- Re: Re: website beta testers, Terry Fielder, 04:36
- Re: website beta testers, Koen Martens, 02:38
- WebSTAR 4.2, Jay Salsburg, 01:39
June 09, 2005
- Re: nullMX, VARA, op=trusted, (was: This is ridiculous.), wayne, 18:14
- Re: Re: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 17:28
- Re: Re: website beta testers, wayne, 17:03
- Re: website beta testers, Frank Ellermann, 17:02
- Re: Re: website beta testers, Daniel Taylor, 15:49
- Re: Re: website beta testers, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:52
- Re: website beta testers, Frank Ellermann, 14:36
- Re: website beta testers, wayne, 13:56
- Re: website beta testers, John Hinton, 13:55
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 13:53
- Re: Acount review, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:49
- Re: website beta testers, wayne, 13:47
- Acount review, security, 13:44
- Re: website beta testers, wayne, 13:43
- RE: website beta testers - Change request, Scott Kitterman, 13:42
- RE: (SPF-Pass) Re: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 13:38
- Re: website beta testers, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:37
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 13:37
- Re: (SPF-Pass) Re: website beta testers, wayne, 13:34
- RE: (SPF-Pass) Re: website beta testers, Bruce Barnes, 13:31
- Re: website beta testers, wayne, 13:26
- RE: website beta testers, Scott Kitterman, 13:24
- website beta testers, wayne, 13:14
- Roberto Olivares is out of the office., Roberto E Olivares, 11:42
- Re: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug, Frank Ellermann, 09:44
- nullMX, VARA, op=trusted, (was: This is ridiculous.), Frank Ellermann, 09:32
- RE: This is ridiculous., Scott Kitterman, 08:54
- Re: This is ridiculous., John Hinton, 07:19
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 06:48
- RE: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug, Scott Kitterman, 06:41
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 05:03
- Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann, 03:36
- Re: Re: bogusmx, Xavier Beaudouin, 03:23
June 08, 2005
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 19:31
- RE: This is ridiculous., Scott Kitterman, 13:43
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 13:21
- RE: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug, Scott Kitterman, 10:52
- RE: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug, David MacQuigg, 10:41
- RE: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug in it or am I reading this wrong...., Scott Kitterman, 10:08
- Re: Re: bogusmx, Ralf Doeblitz, 09:57
- Re: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug in it or am I reading this wrong...., Terry Fielder, 09:47
- Re: Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug in it or am I reading this wrong...., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:47
- Does the dnsstuff.com SPF tool have a bug in it or am I reading this wrong...., Scott Kitterman, 09:41
- RE: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Scott Kitterman, 07:48
- RE: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 07:16
- RE: Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Serre Murphy, 06:57
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Terry Fielder, 06:52
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., william(at)elan.net, 06:49
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Koen Martens, 06:42
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Frank Ellermann, 06:25
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., johnp, 04:57
- Re: Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., Terry Fielder, 04:55
- Collecting domain names for the official SPF website., wayne, 04:41
June 07, 2005
- MS says SenderID will be in Exchange 2003 SP2, wayne, 22:28
- RE: This is ridiculous., Bruce Barnes, 15:54
- SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 14:49
- Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann, 14:48
- Re: Re: bogusmx, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 10:48
- Re: bogusmx, Julian Mehnle, 10:43
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 09:51
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., David MacQuigg, 06:17
June 06, 2005
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 20:37
- Re: Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 18:29
- Re: why spam will never go away, Chuck Mead, 17:49
- Re: why spam will never go away, David MacQuigg, 17:13
- Re: why spam will never go away, Hector Santos, 16:46
- Re: For SPF Council review: Definition of Neutral in combination with definition of Pass, Scott Kitterman, 16:30
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 14:24
- Re: For SPF Council review: Definition of Neutral in combination with definition of Pass, Frank Ellermann, 13:53
- Recording receiver policy in "Received-SPF:" headers (was: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre1), Julian Mehnle, 13:29
- Re: For SPF Council review: Definition of Neutral in combination with definition of Pass, Julian Mehnle, 13:06
- Re: bogusmx, wayne, 12:53
- Final SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02, wayne, 12:50
- Re: Suggesting SMTP and DSN codes in case receiver chooses to reject on TempError and PermError, Julian Mehnle, 12:29
- Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann, 12:25
- Re: Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3, wayne, 12:04
- Re: why spam will never go away, David MacQuigg, 11:58
- Re: Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3, wayne, 11:37
- why spam will never go away, wayne, 11:34
- Re: Re: Suggesting SMTP and DSN codes in case receiver chooses to reject on TempError and PermError, wayne, 11:32
- Re: bogusmx, Julian Mehnle, 11:16
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Julian Mehnle, 11:02
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Hannah Schroeter, 10:55
- 12.2 and xml2rfc 1.29 (was: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3), Frank Ellermann, 10:51
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3, Frank Ellermann, 10:28
- Re: bogusmx, william(at)elan.net, 10:25
- Re: Suggesting SMTP and DSN codes in case receiver chooses to reject on TempError and PermError, Frank Ellermann, 10:19
- Re: bogusmx, Julian Mehnle, 10:16
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3, Frank Ellermann, 10:01
- Re: Suggesting SMTP and DSN codes in case receiver chooses to reject on TempError and PermError, wayne, 09:34
- Suggesting SMTP and DSN codes in case receiver chooses to reject on TempError and PermError, Julian Mehnle, 09:29
- New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre3, wayne, 08:42
- Re: Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, Daniel Taylor, 07:24
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, Frank Ellermann, 06:37
- Re: Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, wayne, 05:01
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 03:16
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 00:14
June 05, 2005
- Re: Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, wayne, 19:50
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, Frank Ellermann, 17:59
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, Frank Ellermann, 16:30
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, wayne, 16:12
- Re: Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, william(at)elan.net, 15:43
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, Frank Ellermann, 15:21
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, william(at)elan.net, 14:33
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, wayne, 14:28
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, william(at)elan.net, 14:08
- New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre2, wayne, 13:25
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 13:24
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, Chris Haynes, 12:57
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, Daniel Taylor, 12:37
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:03
- Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann, 11:32
- Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, Frank Ellermann, 11:01
- Re: This is ridiculous., Frank Ellermann, 10:26
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, Frank Ellermann, 09:56
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 09:52
June 04, 2005
- Addition to why? page, Scott Kitterman, 20:28
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, wayne, 16:41
- Re: Website content., johnp, 14:01
- Re: exp modifier and I18N, Chris Haynes, 12:16
- Re: Another SPF website (Was: Anyone else need write access?), Daniel Taylor, 11:51
- Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 11:36
- Re: Re: bogusmx, Julian Mehnle, 11:03
- exp modifier and I18N, Florian Weimer, 10:59
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 10:54
- Re: Website content., Julian Mehnle, 10:43
- RE: This is ridiculous., John Glube, 10:24
- Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, Jeroen Massar, 08:52
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:46
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, wayne, 08:30
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, wayne, 08:26
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, william(at)elan.net, 08:25
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, php, 08:12
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, wayne, 07:43
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, Scott Kitterman, 07:35
- Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR?, wayne, 06:51
- Re: This is ridiculous., wayne, 06:21
- Re: Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Jeroen Massar, 05:47
- Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Frank Ellermann, 05:00
- Re: 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:43
- 'unknown' mechanisms / binary SPF RR? (Was: Re: op=dkim), Jeroen Massar, 04:01
June 03, 2005
- Re: Another SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 21:43
- Re: Re: Another SPF website, wayne, 21:22
- Re: Another SPF website, Frank Ellermann, 21:07
- Another SPF website (Was: Anyone else need write access?), wayne, 20:30
- Re: Website content., wayne, 19:58
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Koen Martens, 18:49
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Commerco WebMaster, 16:28
- Re: Re: Website content., Jason Gurtz, 15:27
- Re: Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 15:25
- Re: Re: op=dkim, Hector Santos, 15:15
- Re: Website content., Frank Ellermann, 15:11
- Re: Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 15:04
- Re: Website content., Frank Ellermann, 14:58
- Re: Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 14:39
- Re: op=dkim, Frank Ellermann, 13:56
- Re: op=dkim, Terry Fielder, 13:27
- op=dkim, Frank Ellermann, 13:14
- Re: bogusmx, Frank Ellermann, 11:29
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Frank Ellermann, 11:08
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., william(at)elan.net, 11:05
- Re: Website content., Lou Katz, 11:01
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Hector Santos, 10:59
- Re: Anyone else need write access?, Terry Fielder, 10:40
- Anyone else need write access?, Daniel Taylor, 10:34
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 10:18
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Hector Santos, 10:02
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 09:59
- Re: bogusmx, Julian Mehnle, 09:23
- Re: This is ridiculous., Julian Mehnle, 09:17
- Re: Website content., Frank Ellermann, 08:53
- bogusmx (was: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass".), Frank Ellermann, 08:32
- Re: This is ridiculous., johnp, 08:22
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Frank Ellermann, 08:14
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Frank Ellermann, 08:05
- Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 07:53
- Re: Website content., Julian Mehnle, 07:49
- Re: Website content., Daniel Taylor, 07:44
- Re: This is ridiculous., Julian Mehnle, 07:43
- Website content., Daniel Taylor, 07:31
- Re: This is ridiculous., johnp, 06:57
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Daniel Taylor, 06:57
- This is ridiculous., Daniel Taylor, 06:51
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 06:34
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Theo Schlossnagle, 06:16
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 05:48
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 05:20
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 05:07
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 04:28
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 03:18
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Commerco WebMaster, 02:48
- Re: SPF HELO fails, Terry Fielder, 02:33
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark Shewmaker, 00:43
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark Shewmaker, 00:40
June 02, 2005
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Hector Santos, 23:53
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Hector Santos, 23:44
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Hector Santos, 23:35
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 22:03
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 21:02
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 20:29
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., wayne, 19:43
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:35
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 19:31
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., wayne, 19:18
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 19:11
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., wayne, 19:03
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 18:59
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., wayne, 18:53
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:52
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Chris Haynes, 18:36
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 18:33
- Re: SPF HELO fails, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:29
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:23
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., wayne, 18:17
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Scott Kitterman, 17:56
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 17:54
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Hector Santos, 17:52
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Chris Haynes, 17:50
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 17:38
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 17:35
- SPF HELO fails, Dennis Willson, 17:31
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 17:25
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:10
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Commerco WebMaster, 16:52
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 16:46
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 16:32
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Dennis Willson, 15:34
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Frank Ellermann, 15:19
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 14:44
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 14:41
- RE: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 14:38
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Graham Murray, 14:33
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 14:16
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 13:51
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Graham Murray, 13:50
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Frank Ellermann, 12:06
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Terry Fielder, 11:26
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Terry Fielder, 11:18
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Dennis Willson, 11:10
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., william(at)elan.net, 11:06
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark Shewmaker, 10:55
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Julian Mehnle, 10:52
- Re: Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Terry Fielder, 10:33
- Request for Input on the meaning of "pass"., Mark, 10:21
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, wayne, 08:12
- Re: [Council watch] Today featuring <grumpy>, Frank Ellermann, 08:01
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, william(at)elan.net, 07:52
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, Daniel Taylor, 07:51
- Re: The direction of the SPF project, johnp, 06:05
- Re: DK and IIM have merged, johnp, 06:04
- Re: The direction of the SPF project, wayne, 06:03
- Re: The direction of the SPF project, johnp, 05:57
- DK and IIM have merged, wayne, 05:53
- Re: [Council watch] Today featuring <grumpy>, wayne, 05:25
- The direction of the SPF project, wayne, 05:16
- RE: (SPF-Pass) Re: [Council watch] Today featuring <grumpy>, Bruce Barnes, 03:44
June 01, 2005
- Re: [Council watch] Today featuring <grumpy>, johnp, 23:43
- [Council watch] Today featuring <grumpy>, Frank Ellermann, 22:26
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Frank Ellermann, 11:21
- Re: Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, wayne, 10:22
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre1, wayne, 10:15
- Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Frank Ellermann, 10:06
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre1, Mark Shewmaker, 08:12
- Re: New SPFv1 spec: draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02pre1, wayne, 06:38
- Re: Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, wayne, 06:37
- RE: Re: For SPF Council review - FAIL PermError vs. NONE NXDOMAIN, Scott Kitterman, 05:48