SPF Discuss (date)
November 30, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, Manish Bali, 22:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, G.D.S.Marshall, 22:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, G.D.S.Marshall, 21:57
- [spf-discuss] How to implement spf in sendmail, Manish Bali, 21:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 16:05
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, David Woodhouse, 16:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Dick St.Peters, 15:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 14:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 13:56
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, John A. Martin, 13:08
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:46
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Dick St.Peters, 10:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Frank Ellermann, 08:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, David Woodhouse, 07:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 07:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, David Woodhouse, 06:50
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, David Woodhouse, 05:43
November 29, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Dick St.Peters, 09:36
- [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Julian Mehnle, 07:38
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 07:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 06:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 06:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Arjen de Korte, 06:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Julian Mehnle, 06:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Scott Kitterman, 05:44
- [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Julian Mehnle, 05:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Scott Kitterman, 05:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 05:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Scott Kitterman, 05:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 05:16
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 05:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Julian Mehnle, 04:54
- [spf-discuss] Re: Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Julian Mehnle, 04:48
- Re: Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, David Woodhouse, 03:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Arjen de Korte, 01:33
November 28, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Craig Whitmore, 18:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Updated Query.pm for Mail::Query::SPF, Julian Mehnle, 18:42
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-devel] Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Scott Kitterman, 18:17
- [spf-discuss] Polishing Mail::SPF::Query, Julian Mehnle, 18:12
- [spf-discuss] Updated Query.pm for Mail::Query::SPF, Craig Whitmore, 14:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Stuart D. Gathman, 13:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, paddy, 13:20
November 26, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Larry Smith, 22:30
- Re[2]: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Chris, 20:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Scott Kitterman, 20:19
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Larry Smith, 19:12
- [spf-discuss] Bounce-Spam and SPF-Ignorant ISPs - it is time to retaliate?, Chris, 18:09
November 24, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 11:47
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 10:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 10:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 10:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 10:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, paddy, 09:36
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 09:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, william(at)elan.net, 08:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 08:20
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 07:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, j o a r, 00:59
November 23, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Let's all play nice...., wayne, 17:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 17:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Julian Mehnle, 17:20
- [spf-discuss] Halfway there!, j o a r, 17:16
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Julian Mehnle, 17:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 17:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 16:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Dick St.Peters, 16:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:03
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 15:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, David Beveridge, 15:36
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Scott Kitterman, 15:29
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 15:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 14:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 13:20
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 13:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 12:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 11:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 11:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Graham Murray, 08:24
- [spf-discuss] Let's all play nice...., Scott Kitterman, 08:12
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Mark, 08:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Mark, 08:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 06:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Graham Murray, 05:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Stuart D. Gathman, 00:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 00:38
November 22, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 19:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: [srs-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Astromech, 18:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 17:58
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Bruce Barnes, 16:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 15:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:28
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 13:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Dick St.Peters, 13:20
- [spf-discuss] Re: SRS whitelist, Julian Mehnle, 12:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Andreas Saurwein, 10:42
- [spf-discuss] Requiring PTR harms SPF, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 10:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 09:52
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Jason Gurtz, 09:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Dick St.Peters, 09:39
- OT: Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Bruce Barnes, 09:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Bruce Barnes, 08:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 08:42
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Dick St.Peters, 08:32
November 21, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 22:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 19:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Scott Kitterman, 19:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 19:06
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 19:01
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 18:26
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Matthew.van.Eerde, 18:09
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Matthew.van.Eerde, 18:02
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, David MacQuigg, 14:04
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Hector Santos, 13:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Matthew.van.Eerde, 13:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption statistics, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Kurt Andersen, 11:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Scott Kitterman, 07:52
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Frank Ellermann, 04:27
November 20, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Julian Mehnle, 18:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 15:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Automated SPF adoption surveys, william(at)elan.net, 15:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Automated SPF adoption surveys, wayne, 13:29
- [spf-discuss] Automated SPF adoption surveys (was: SPF adoption), Julian Mehnle, 13:21
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 13:03
- [spf-discuss] Council reference in draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02 (was: What next: new elections or disolve or dither?), Julian Mehnle, 13:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 12:55
November 18, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Scott Kitterman, 20:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] What next: new elections or disolve or dither?, Scott Kitterman, 20:16
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, william(at)elan.net, 17:42
- [spf-discuss] RE: [spf-council] SPF Council Meeting: Sunday Nov 20th, 22:00 UTC, william(at)elan.net, 17:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Changing the SPF rules: [was: Is best guess moronic?], Stuart D. Gathman, 15:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 13:50
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Mark, 13:48
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Mark, 13:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 13:27
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Dick St.Peters, 13:27
- [spf-discuss] Changing the SPF rules: [was: Is best guess moronic?], Hector Santos, 12:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Daniel Taylor, 12:51
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 12:29
- [spf-discuss] Remove non-standard PASS - BEST GUESS from Received-SPF:, Hector Santos, 12:14
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Mark, 12:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 11:47
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 11:01
- RE: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Mark, 09:54
- [spf-discuss] survey results of SPF records at the HELO domain, wayne, 09:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Frank Ellermann, 09:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 08:16
- [spf-discuss] Re: Is best guess moronic?, Frank Ellermann, 06:23
- [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Frank Ellermann, 06:09
- [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Frank Ellermann, 05:57
November 17, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 22:14
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 21:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is best guess moronic?, Stuart D. Gathman, 21:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Hector Santos, 20:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 19:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Scott Kitterman, 19:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 18:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 17:41
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status of the SPF RFC, Frank Ellermann, 17:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is best guess moronic?, Hector Santos, 16:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] Is best guess moronic?, Scott Kitterman, 16:28
- [spf-discuss] Is best guess moronic?, Stuart D. Gathman, 16:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] Status of the SPF RFC, wayne, 16:00
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 15:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Julian Mehnle, 15:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Jeff Macdonald, 14:59
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Michael Elliott, 14:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 14:57
- [spf-discuss] Re: GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Frank Ellermann, 14:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Frank Ellermann, 14:30
- [spf-discuss] Request for ballot item, Mark Shewmaker, 13:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 13:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 13:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Craig Whitmore, 13:41
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 13:38
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Hector Santos, 13:34
- Re: [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Arjen de Korte, 13:33
- [spf-discuss] GMAIL mis-usage of SPF?, Hector Santos, 13:19
- [spf-discuss] Does anyone actually filter by spf records?, Stever, 13:03
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Daniel Taylor, 12:51
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 12:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, wayne, 10:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 09:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, wayne, 09:20
- Re: [spf-discuss] For Council review (was: SPF council: new elections or disolve?), Dotzero, 06:42
- [spf-discuss] For Council review (was: SPF council: new elections or disolve?), Frank Ellermann, 05:45
- [spf-discuss] Test suite (was: What next: new elections or disolve or dither?), Frank Ellermann, 05:29
- [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Frank Ellermann, 05:13
- [spf-discuss] Re: DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Frank Ellermann, 05:02
- [spf-discuss] Request for change: the wizard again, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 05:01
- [spf-discuss] off by one error in the wizard?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 04:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF adoption, Frank Ellermann, 04:40
November 16, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF adoption, wayne, 22:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] News from the MAAWG/APWG conference, Hector Santos, 22:07
- Re: [spf-discuss] News from the MAAWG/APWG conference, Terry Fielder, 18:49
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Julian Mehnle, 15:36
- [spf-discuss] SPF adoption (was: News from the MAAWG/APWG conference), Julian Mehnle, 15:17
- Re: [spf-discuss] News from the MAAWG/APWG conference, wayne, 14:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Scott Kitterman, 12:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, william(at)elan.net, 12:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Terry Fielder, 12:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, wayne, 12:31
- [spf-discuss] DKIM Reuse of SPF RR Type, Scott Kitterman, 12:24
- Re: [spf-discuss] What next: new elections or disolve or dither?, wayne, 11:12
- Re: [spf-discuss] What next: new elections or disolve or dither?, Scott Kitterman, 11:08
- Re: [spf-discuss] What next: new elections or disolve or dither?, Terry Fielder, 10:47
- [spf-discuss] What next: new elections or disolve or dither?, Scott Kitterman, 10:38
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Daniel Taylor, 10:27
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Daniel Taylor, 10:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Frank Ellermann, 03:35
November 14, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: IESG bar BOF, Frank Ellermann, 21:35
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Stuart D. Gathman, 15:14
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Koen Martens, 14:54
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Dotzero, 13:01
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 12:30
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Scott Kitterman, 11:39
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 11:16
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 10:57
November 12, 2005
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Greg Connor, 23:59
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 19:57
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 13:18
- [spf-discuss] Re: www.openspf.org/, Frank Ellermann, 12:43
- [spf-discuss] Re: Status of the SPF RFC, Frank Ellermann, 12:31
- [spf-discuss] Re: SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Frank Ellermann, 12:16
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 11:32
November 11, 2005
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark, 15:27
- [spf-discuss] Status of the SPF RFC, wayne, 15:20
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Terry Fielder, 15:06
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Boyd Lynn Gerber, 14:44
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 14:29
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 12:26
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 12:03
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 11:48
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 11:45
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Dotzero, 11:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 11:39
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 11:36
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 11:35
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Terry Fielder, 11:25
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 11:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] www.openspf.org/, wayne, 05:21
- [spf-discuss] www.openspf.org/, Frank Ellermann, 02:41
November 06, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Scott Kitterman, 20:58
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 20:32
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Scott Kitterman, 20:23
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Mark Holm, 20:13
November 04, 2005
- [spf-discuss] Re: An article on SPF and SID., Frank Ellermann, 17:46
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, wayne, 14:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, wayne, 14:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Stuart D. Gathman, 14:10
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Arjen de Korte, 14:02
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, wayne, 13:31
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Stuart D. Gathman, 12:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: An article on SPF and SID., william(at)elan.net, 12:43
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: An article on SPF and SID., Jeff Macdonald, 12:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Scott Kitterman, 11:12
- [spf-discuss] Does an SPF record need to be an IP?, Lai, Allen, 11:05
November 03, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, Hector Santos, 21:03
- RE: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Seth Goodman, 17:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Constantine A. Murenin, 16:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, Constantine A. Murenin, 15:50
- [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, spf-discuss, 15:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 14:47
- [spf-discuss] website discussions have moved to the SPF-webmasters list, wayne, 14:39
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Mark Shewmaker, 13:41
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF Mail Summary Report, wayne, 10:37
- [spf-discuss] Re: An article on SPF and SID., Frank Ellermann, 07:00
- RE: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Kelly, Michael, 06:33
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Frank Ellermann, 05:45
- RE: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Bruce Barnes, 04:51
- [spf-discuss] Re: Website., Frank Ellermann, 04:22
- [spf-discuss] Re: An article on SPF and SID., Frank Ellermann, 03:55
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Bernd Petrovitsch, 02:39
November 02, 2005
- Re: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 21:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 21:30
- RE: [spf-council] Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Mark, 17:19
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., wayne, 14:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Scott Kitterman, 14:11
- Re: [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Dotzero, 14:08
- RE: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Kelly, Michael, 13:50
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Scott Kitterman, 13:39
- RE: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Kelly, Michael, 13:22
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Daniel Taylor, 13:15
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, william(at)elan.net, 13:02
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Mark Shewmaker, 12:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Scott Kitterman, 12:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., william(at)elan.net, 12:53
- Re: [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., wayne, 12:51
- [spf-discuss] An article on SPF and SID., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 12:46
- [spf-discuss] Website., Boyd Lynn Gerber, 12:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 11:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Constantine A. Murenin, 11:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 11:54
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, wayne, 11:42
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, william(at)elan.net, 11:35
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Stuart D. Gathman, 08:30
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Terry Fielder, 07:56
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 07:48
- [spf-discuss] Re: [spf-council] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, Scott Kitterman, 07:48
- [spf-discuss] SPF council: new elections or disolve?, wayne, 07:45
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Constantine A. Murenin, 04:23
November 01, 2005
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 19:57
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Richard Bollinger, 15:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Scott Kitterman, 15:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, wayne, 15:37
- [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 15:37
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 15:37
- RE: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Seth Goodman, 13:57
- RE: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Seth Goodman, 13:44
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Constantine A. Murenin, 13:16
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, wayne, 13:13
- Re: [spf-discuss] OT: mailing list screwed up, Alex van den Bogaerdt, 13:09
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 08:49
- [spf-discuss] Re: the SPF website domain name, Frank Ellermann, 08:40
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, wayne, 08:39
- Re: [spf-discuss] Re: the SPF website domain name, wayne, 08:29
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Koen Martens, 08:18
- Re: [spf-discuss] the SPF website domain name, Michael Weiner, 04:47
- [spf-discuss] Re: the SPF website domain name, Frank Ellermann, 04:42