Terry Fielder wrote:
In addition to the loss of legit emails are the potential for PRA
flagging forged emails as legitimate based on misinterpretation of
v=spf1. Phishers etc could use these false "PRA PASS" events for
harmful means, especially if PR encourages the public to believe
that a "PRA PASS" means the email is safe/secure in some fashion.
Yes, that's short and clear. It also shows that we want to get
it right for both protocols - a bogus PRA PASS is more an issue
for PRA than for v=spf1.
Bye, Frank
-------
Sender Policy Framework: http://www.openspf.org/
Archives at http://archives.listbox.com/spf-discuss/current/
To unsubscribe, change your address, or temporarily deactivate your
subscription,
please go to
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=spf-discuss(_at_)v2(_dot_)listbox(_dot_)com