On Thu, 1 Dec 2005, Ajay Varghese wrote:
Murray, I have my relaxed/relaxed working with both reflector, are you
sure the dkim-signature header also is canonicalized to relaxed, mistake
I did.
Yeah, it's doing that properly, or at least (other than CRLFs) agrees with
what one of the other reflectors is doing.
Actually I may have found a couple of problems, one on my side and one
with the long.name reflector.
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev