dkim-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [dkim-dev] Updated implementations

2006-06-20 11:27:25

On Jun 20, 2006, at 10:54 AM, Mircea Purdea wrote:



Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
To those of you with implementations modified to support base-01 and base-02 (mainly the "bh" tag), did you leave in backward compatibility for verifying signatures generated with base-00?

A customer is wondering what impact it'll have if they use the newer code.

My implementation no longer supports the old spec. Like someone on the -ietf list said, it's bad practice to prolong the use of expired drafts.
You know, progress, and all that...

While this sounds reasonable, http:/www.mipassoc.org/dkim/ website does not offer this advice. It does seem DomainKeys would be the stable version. DKIM current would be for testing and trials.

-Doug

_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>