Mircea Purdea wrote:
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
To those of you with implementations modified to support base-01 and
base-02 (mainly the "bh" tag), did you leave in backward
compatibility for verifying signatures generated with base-00?
A customer is wondering what impact it'll have if they use the newer
code.
My implementation no longer supports the old spec. Like someone on the
-ietf list said, it's bad practice to prolong the use of expired drafts.
You know, progress, and all that...
In this particular case, we have been telling people that -allman-01 was
a stable
draft and to implement that, which I think given how things have panned
out is
still good advice. If we get through last call in the next month or so
as we're hoping,
we might change our tune, but as I said there isn't much difficulty in
supporting both
in the verifier.
Mike
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev