Juan Altmayer Pizzorno wrote:
Folks,
"g=;" in the key, according to DKIM draft, "never matches any addresses".
Does anybody know what is the rationale for creating a key that never matches
any addresses? It seems to me it would have made more sense for it to match
the empty local part, which happens in i='s default. What am I missing?
In the deep recesses of my memory this was a way of invalidating
a key. Or more precisely, another way. (p=; being another :)
Mike
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev