Likewise, my reflector dkim-test(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com sends the canonicalized
output
in the message back from the reflector itself.
Mike
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Eric Allman wrote:
Ah. I think the problem is that you need to append the \r\n on b=
before you sign. You're adding it after signing.
Actually the CRLF should not be there when you feed the header to
canonicalization (RFC4871 3.7). Therefore the algorithm you presented
appears to be correct, but that's not code or actual data so it's hard
to say what's actually gone wrong.
If you send a test message to sa-test(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)net and have a DK-style
policy published with a special flag set, our auto-responder will
reply to you with the canonicalizations it generated when receiving
your message. When you get those back, you can diff what we saw
against what you sent and figure out what's gone wrong.
The special flag is "r=", e.g.:
t=y; o=~; r=user(_at_)domain
...will cause a failure report to be sent to "user(_at_)domain".
--
Murray S. Kucherawy =========================================
msk(_at_)sendmail(_dot_)com
Principal Engineer Sendmail, Inc. Emeryville,
CA, USA
(510) 594-5400
http://www.sendmail.com
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev