RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems

dkim-dev

RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems

2007-06-14 14:57:40

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Bill Volz wrote:

In addition to that is there a formal recommended expiration length(x=)? I didn't see any suggested values.


Not that I recall.
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Bill Volz Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Eric Allman Message not available RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Eric Allman RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Eric Allman RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Michael Thomas Message not available RE: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Murray S. Kucherawy <= Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Juan Altmayer Pizzorno [dkim-dev] List of reflectors, Dave Crocker Re: [dkim-dev] List of reflectors, Murray S. Kucherawy Re: [dkim-dev] List of reflectors, Juan Altmayer Pizzorno

Previous by Date:	Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Michael Thomas
Next by Date:	Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
Previous by Thread:	Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Michael Thomas
Next by Thread:	Re: [dkim-dev] verification failed problems, Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]