dkim-dev
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [dkim-dev] DKIM Reflectors produce wrong results (part II)

2008-04-14 08:15:13
Steffen Lehmann <lehmann(_at_)strato-rz(_dot_)de> 4/14/08 10:58 AM >>>
I think the reflectors have difficulties with the body line
   "

     =B7          =B7         =B7          =B7=20

"

which is canonicalized to

'20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7=20'0D''0A'

The body canon algo is "relaxed", 

I don't think so. The signature itself does not specify a body canon, and
according to RFC 4871, section 3.5, c=:

       If
       only one algorithm is named, that algorithm is used for the
       header and "simple" is used for the body.  For example,
       "c=relaxed" is treated the same as "c=relaxed/simple".


Jason
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>