Jason Long schrieb:
Steffen Lehmann <lehmann(_at_)strato-rz(_dot_)de> 4/14/08 10:58 AM >>>
I think the reflectors have difficulties with the body line
"
=B7 =B7 =B7 =B7=20
"
which is canonicalized to
'20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7'20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20''20'=B7=20'0D''0A'
The body canon algo is "relaxed",
I don't think so. The signature itself does not specify a body canon, and
according to RFC 4871, section 3.5, c=:
If
only one algorithm is named, that algorithm is used for the
header and "simple" is used for the body. For example,
"c=relaxed" is treated the same as "c=relaxed/simple".
Jason
Jason,
you are right. This was a bug in my software where I assemble the
DKIM-Signature header. I have changed the c= tag to c=relaxed/relaxed,
and it works fine. Thaks for your patience. :-)
Steffen
_______________________________________________
dkim-dev mailing list
dkim-dev(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-dev