Yep, that was the question -- thank you :-)
On Sep 16, 2010, at 4:45 PM, John Levine wrote:
So, should the signature be processed as if the default value for the
AUID (i= value) were present or processed as if the AUID (i= value)
wasn't even part of the specification?
I'm asking the question because of this section related to
restricting key applicability across the namespace using t=s in the
key record has a dependency on the AUID in the signature:
If there's no i= then the domain in the implicit i= is the same as the
domain in the d= so t=s will always be satisfied.
Or is that not the right question?
R's,
John
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops