DKIM Ops (date)

DKIM Ops (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

September 30, 2010

[ietf-dkim] ASL/ATPS Zone Record Wizard and Policy Simulator, Hector Santos, 20:16

September 24, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Tony Hansen, 21:55
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Hector Santos, 15:33
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:57
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:38
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Hector Santos, 11:08
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Jeff Macdonald, 09:23

September 22, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Hector Santos, 15:38
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:47
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:28
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS Example, Hector Santos, 08:09
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 07:42
[dkim-ops] DKIM - ATPS, Hector Santos, 07:21
Re: [dkim-ops] New DKIM Verifier Auto Responder, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 06:01
Re: [dkim-ops] New DKIM Verifier Auto Responder, Hector Santos, 05:49
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 05:39
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:15
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Todd Lyons, 00:08

September 21, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, SM, 19:25
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 12:45
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:10

September 19, 2010

[dkim-ops] New DKIM Verifier Auto Responder, Hector Santos, 08:30

September 18, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, SM, 01:53
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 01:18

September 17, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, John Levine, 20:57
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 19:01
Re: [dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Nate Itkin, 18:28
[dkim-ops] DKIM Testing Feedback Loops, Hector Santos, 17:29
[dkim-ops] Please confirm dkim sig validation for this list, Dave CROCKER, 12:28

September 16, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, McDowell, Brett, 16:45
Re: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, John Levine, 15:47
Re: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, McDowell, Brett, 14:44
Re: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:15
Re: [dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:03
[dkim-ops] RFC 5672 and optional vs. default value of AUID, McDowell, Brett, 13:42

September 14, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Hector Santos, 14:42
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), McDowell, Brett, 12:15
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Hector Santos, 10:05
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), McDowell, Brett, 08:55

September 13, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 22:24
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), John Levine, 21:27
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Hector Santos, 18:58
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Murray S. Kucherawy, 17:31
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), J.D. Falk, 17:10
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Rolf E. Sonneveld, 17:10
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Hector Santos, 17:00
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:44
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:41
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Douglas Otis, 16:11
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Douglas Otis, 15:51
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), McDowell, Brett, 15:43
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), McDowell, Brett, 15:05
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:41
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:40
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:40
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 14:40
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:34
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:23
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:22
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:56
[dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), McDowell, Brett, 13:49
Re: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was subdomain vs. cousin domain), Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:49
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Hector Santos, 13:32
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), John Levine, 13:11
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:39
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Hector Santos, 12:02
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Derek Diget, 11:58
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Douglas Otis, 11:48
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Murray S. Kucherawy, 02:01

September 12, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Hector Santos, 12:14

September 10, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, Douglas Otis, 18:50
Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, J.D. Falk, 17:30
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 13:32
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Todd Lyons, 11:52
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 10:03
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain, John Levine, 09:57
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 08:56

September 09, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] hammering with a soldering iron, was subdomain vs. cousin domain, John Levine, 21:40
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs.cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 18:11
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), Douglas Otis, 17:15
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), Hector Santos, 17:03
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 16:44
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), John Levine, 16:18
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 15:09
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Derek Diget, 14:44
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 14:34
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 14:09
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 13:54
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:46
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:44
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 13:37
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 13:20
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 12:29
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:11
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Murray S. Kucherawy, 12:04
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 09:25
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Hector Santos, 08:18
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 08:01

September 08, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Hector Santos, 15:22
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Hector Santos, 15:15
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 14:20
Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Jim Fenton, 13:29

September 07, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 03:36

September 06, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Jim Fenton, 23:02

September 05, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), Douglas Otis, 19:04

September 04, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying"discardable"), MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:41

September 03, 2010

Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), Douglas Otis, 15:01
[dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying "discardable"), McDowell, Brett, 11:12