-----Original Message-----
From: MH Michael Hammer (5304) [mailto:MHammer(_at_)ag(_dot_)com]
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:09 PM
To: McDowell, Brett; Murray S. Kucherawy
Cc: dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: [dkim-ops] BCP for authorizing third-parties ([...] was
subdomain vs. cousin domain)
There is actually another approach besides what you indicate above. A
domain can delegate a domain or subdomain to the 3rd party and let them
generate the keys and signature.
Yes, that's true. But both methods effectively make the third-party signer a
part of the same domain as far as DKIM goes, inasmuch as the delegation is
transparent to the verifier. So, in the end, they look identical.
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops