-----Original Message-----
From: dkim-ops-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
[mailto:dkim-ops-bounces(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Douglas Otis
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 11:16 AM
To: dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
Subject: Re: [dkim-ops] subdomain vs. cousin domain (when deploying
"discardable")
On 9/9/10 9:51 AM, McDowell, Brett wrote:
Does everyone agree that this is the "best practice" for the use case
provided (ignoring I only gave you two namespace options)?
Until more comprehensive policy becomes available, yes.
In general, using a cousin domain is a bad practice, where the term
"far" has not been met by your current practice. [...]
Are there any recorded data supporting that assertion?
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops