Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
Actually engineering intuition was all that is needed.
That's not data, and obviously from the traffic on all the
DKIM lists lately, that intuition is not universal.
Nice Murray! You're quite a nice fella.
Sure its data. It just don't appear out of thin air. I know you could
care less, but we do have 25+ year mail system experience, few
thousands active customer using our system, years worth of stats and
field experiences, including gigabytes of Domainkeys/DKIM collection.
It wasn't hard to predict all the problems existing with DKIM and the
information out there isn't showing anything different. It wasn't
like I was proven wrong with all the issues that has developed. Gee,
not even many promoters of DKIM don't sign mail, including us - I
wonder why. :)
I know you are on a stats track and I'm sure it will interesting, but
I don't see what its going to show beyond what was already know.
Anyway, this went off course.
--
Hector Santos, CTO
http://www.santronics.com
http://santronics.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
dkim-ops mailing list
dkim-ops(_at_)mipassoc(_dot_)org
http://mipassoc.org/mailman/listinfo/dkim-ops