Eric,
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:29:41AM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Jason Tishler <jason(_at_)tishler(_dot_)net>:
Would you consider accepting this patch into fetchmail CVS?
Taken, thanks.
Attached is (two versions of) "take 2" of my patch that applies the
Winsock recv/WSARecv(..., MSG_PEEK) workaround to socket.c -- this time
to both the non-SSL *and* SSL #ifdef code sections. The first patch,
socket.c-2.diff, assumes that my previous patch has been applied.
The second one, socket.c-3.diff, is against the original 5.9.11 source.
Please choose the one that is most convenient for you to use.
I apologize for the gyrations, but I didn't realize the need to patch
SockRead() for both the non-SSL and SSL cases. If interested, see the
following Cygwin mailing list thread for the details:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg01554.html
Note that I have re-factored my patch to handle both cases in a way which
I think is less intrusive than my first attempt. Would you consider
accepting this new version into fetchmail CVS?
Thanks,
Jason
socket.c-2.diff
Description: Text document
socket.c-3.diff
Description: Text document