Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP

There's no glaring error. I never said that MX records weren't supposed to
replace source routing. I never said they shouldn't replace source routing.
I simply said they HAVEN'T replaced source routing.

I receive mail with source routes attached to it daily. You will have a
difficult time convincing me that these messages are a figment of my
imagination.

                                Ned

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Eliot Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Tim Kehres Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Mark Crispin Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Erik E. Fair Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, G B Reilly Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Ned Freed, Postmaster Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Ned Freed, Postmaster <=

Previous by Date:	Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Next by Date:	Re: I vote NO to Richmail, Neil Katin
Previous by Thread:	Re: on the end-to-endness of SMTP, Ned Freed, Postmaster
Next by Thread:	Statistics -- richmail utility, Nathaniel Borenstein
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]