Re: ISO? DIS? 10646 and RFC-XXXX

ietf-822

1991-06-13 19:26:09

One should now repeat the principle, articulated nearly six months ago,
that anticipating Standards is not a good idea.


I agree. We should not discuss 10646 in detail until we know what it IS.


EvdP

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
ISO? DIS? 10646 and RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin Re: ISO? DIS? 10646 and RFC-XXXX, Erik M. van der Poel <=

Previous by Date:	Re: Richmail & Idraw, Jonathan Rosenberg
Next by Date:	Re: data announcement, Erik M. van der Poel
Previous by Thread:	ISO? DIS? 10646 and RFC-XXXX, John C Klensin
Next by Thread:	DISCUSSION: Richmail - structure, not formatting, Mats Ohrman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]