ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

Returned mail: User unknown

1991-09-28 18:46:07
   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
550 hansen(_at_)pegasus(_dot_)PEGASUS(_dot_)COM(_dot_)(_dot_)(_dot_) User 
unknown

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Received: by pegasus.com (5.51/PEGASUS-2.2)
        id AA27622; Sat, 28 Sep 91 13:07:57 HST
From: 
humu!(_at_)att(_dot_)att(_dot_)com:owner-ietf-822(_at_)dimacs(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu
Received: from att.att.com by humu.nosc.mil (5.61/1.35)
        id AA09337; Sat, 28 Sep 91 12:09:00 -1000
Received: from att by att.att.com; Sat, 28 Sep 1991 18:10 EDT
Received: by att.att.com; Sat Sep 28 18:07:47 EDT 1991
Received: by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) 
        id AA04495; Sat, 28 Sep 91 17:34:54 EDT
Received: from dkuug.dk by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.4/3.08) 
        id AA04491; Sat, 28 Sep 91 17:34:48 EDT
Received: by dkuug.dk (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8)
        id AA27542; Sat, 28 Sep 91 23:31:56 +0200
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 91 23:31:56 +0200
Original-From: Keld J|rn Simonsen <keld(_at_)dkuug(_dot_)dk>
Message-Id: <9109282131(_dot_)AA27542(_at_)dkuug(_dot_)dk>
To: MRC(_at_)panda(_dot_)com, paf(_at_)nada(_dot_)kth(_dot_)se
Subject: Re: New-ish idea on non-ascii headers
Cc: ietf-822(_at_)dimacs(_dot_)rutgers(_dot_)edu
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 1152

"Patrik F{ltstr|m" looks correct on a Swedish 7-bit terminal.  It looks
hideous with no resemblance to the Swedish reality on a US-ASCII, JIS, or any
other non-Swedish terminal.

It looks allright on my Danish terminal. It would look alright on any 
terminal running national versions of ISO 646 in the countries:
Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Finland, Germany, Austria, Switzerland.
That is a big part of Europe.

Anyway I agree with you that we should do Euro-centric solutions.

A quick remark to John Klensin: I *do* have mnemonics for the
east-asian languages, and JIS is officially employing these
mnemonics in their POSIX Japanese locale specification.
Some 24.000 mnemonics have been defined. So Ran Atkinson's
indication that mnemonic is not technical viable for eastern-asian
languages is simply not true. On the other hand, I understand that
the Japanese are happy with their EUC encoding, which is 7-bit 
and in wide use in networking, so they do not need mnemonic.

Maybe Ran is hinting at Vietnamese support, which is currently
lacking in RFC-MNEM, but I have done work on it, and you cannot
expect everything to happen overnight.

Keld


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>