Nathaniel states comfort with retaining 'message' and concern for not
being able to encode ../external.
1. I repeat that the issue of using the 'message' label isn't intended, by
me, to be viewed as a showstopper. However, I think it looks... well, at
least "odd" to use the term 'message' to refer to something that isn't
known to be a message, and usually won't be one.
2. I am, again, missing something important, because I don't understand
why the external information (real content-type and assocated Access fields)
can not be encoded. What is the problem?
Dave