Re: Values of "MIME-Version"

I am uncomfortable with using RFC-XXXX as a version number, because
RFC-XXX is used over and over and over again for new RFC drafts.

I would hold with the tradition of using the new RFC-<number> whatever
it turns out to be.  RFC-XXXX does not reference anything permanent,
and it certainly does not reference the most relevant RFC.

Cheers...\Stef

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Values of "MIME-Version", Nathaniel Borenstein re: Values of "MIME-Version", Mark Crispin Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Einar Stefferud <= Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Bill Cattey Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Greg Vaudreuil Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Mark Crispin Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Shannon Yeh

Previous by Date:	re: Values of "MIME-Version", Mark Crispin
Next by Date:	Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Bill Cattey
Previous by Thread:	re: Values of "MIME-Version", Mark Crispin
Next by Thread:	Re: Values of "MIME-Version", Bill Cattey
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]