ietf-822
[Top] [All Lists]

[no subject]

1992-12-21 10:05:28
        i doubt that it is a profitable use of this mailing-list's
time to sample some of the bickering underlying the code-point
assignments in 10646/unicode. the bottom line is that if we can't
somehow get 10646 characters through, who cares about CJK
unification or not? i fully expect within a year or three that
japan (and maybe china) will ask for a plane of their own
assignment (that is, another 64K characters) and then they'll
be happy. of course, this will screw up the unicode folks big-time
but if you hew to 10646 and the UTF encodings, then everything will
just work.

                andrew

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>