Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard)

I agree with Edward Vielmetti.
I want MIME for the headers, not the rich text.
Define Content types for existing formats, and wait for the
battle over standard text formats to settle out a little.
Add the "setext" format (used in TidBITS) to his list - very simple,
readable stuff: **bold**, _underlined_, etc.

Neal_McBurnett(_at_)ATT(_dot_)COM (Neal McBurnett)      303-538-4852    AT&T 
Bell Labs, Denver

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), (continued) RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Ned Freed Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Edward Vielmetti RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Ned Freed RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), John W Noerenberg RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), John C Klensin Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Edward Vielmetti Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Steve Summit Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Edward Vielmetti Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), John C Klensin Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Steve Summit Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Neal McBurnett <= Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Nathaniel Borenstein Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), John C Klensin Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Jack Stewart Re: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), John W Noerenberg RE: Richtext and SGML (Was: MIME to Draft Standard), Sarah Dickinson