Ned said:
The MIME specification already allows for additional
Content- headers. This merely provides information
about how to handle a part of a message. It is
therefore not a change at all; it is an extension.
It can also be described in a separate document; I
think it probably should start out this way.
It seems we have agreement here. I'll put together a draft
and post it for comment in the next day or so. It will
basically say:
"add a Content-Disposition header to the headers enumerated
in rfc1341, with initial allowable values of 'inline' and
'attachment. Said header will only be legal in bodyparts,
not in top-level messages.'
Does this sound like what we want?
-Rens
__ ___ , __
/__) /__ /| / ( | J. Laurens Troost Lehman Brothers Technical Services
/ \ (___ / |/ __) | *Opinions expressed herein are mine. Mine, I tell you!*
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INET: rens(_at_)shearson(_dot_)com VOICE: (212) 464-3705 FAX:
(212) 464-2040