I found this example of why I think we need to be able to hide
"optional but not essential" header-like body parts.
That is what the multipart/related;header= construct set out to do.
So far, there has been next to no comments on this aspect.
In article <9305242343(_dot_)AA17749(_at_)xap(_dot_)xyplex(_dot_)com>,
rlstewart(_at_)eng(_dot_)xyplex(_dot_)COM (Bob Stewart) writes:
|> >-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
|> >Proc-Type: 4,MIC-CLEAR
|> >Content-Domain: RFC822
|> >Originator-Certificate:
|> > MIIBxTCCAWECARIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQECBQAwTTELMAkGA1UEBhMCVVMxIDAeBgNV
|> > BAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMRwwGgYDVQQLExNQZXJzb25hIENl
|> > cnRpZmljYXRlMB4XDTkzMDQxMjIyNTI1N1oXDTk1MDQxMjA1MDAwMFowYzELMAkG
|> > A1UEBhMCVVMxIDAeBgNVBAoTF1JTQSBEYXRhIFNlY3VyaXR5LCBJbmMuMRwwGgYD
|> > VQQLExNQZXJzb25hIENlcnRpZmljYXRlMRQwEgYDVQQDEwtSYXltb25kIExhdTB5
|> > MAoGBFUIAQECAgMAA2sAMGgCYQC4Lq5eHwr4u4bY7VggmpOwmyqhq9nMVR7VuaUy
|> > 4MOTPLPHi/dZM5E2gdODG1uV2YoGDNNTuVFRO4osQwxTOWMt9oEththrXOYI6oZ8
|> > lzyYfmgLVL15S7HCV/GYJdlPuO0CAwEAATANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQIFAANPAAUVNpom
|> > zLBp6r72gqG6bBU1eFbv9bNKk4WSQCXYRbulGmhyLCXItASYloprlBxKHm8EP178
|> > P8z1rlbRNAoWw2G5q2550I6UUiJ5OOkVwB==
|> >MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
|> > lTseoQ7YapjkRdsuA8YgFUP2MILA7WIMhLwyZVo2dvmYyeRewagzLzlm1cTwU74n
|> > RIsG50Fa/RJmzxukw08ojOVuBeEfTO/h263Fm5lhvHrv1FHKuW2sCl5JgzhswK8d
|>
|> I'm in danger of getting really nasty. How nice for Richard Lau that he is
so
|> important that his mail is authenticated. Is such a glop of cybercrud to
|> become standard at the front of every message we peasants get from the
|> authenticated elite.
|>
|> Will you guys go fluff your egos elsewhere.
|>
|> Bob
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand
Harald(_dot_)Alvestrand(_at_)delab(_dot_)sintef(_dot_)no
C=no;PRMD=uninett;O=sintef;OU=delab;S=alvestrand;G=harald
+47 7 59 70 94