Re: Thoughts about characters transmission

> > It assignes a single code point to different but similar characters
> > in Japan and China.
> I thought that this was the problem of Unicode and not of ISO 10646.
Correct. It was a problem of Unicode and not of DIS 10646-1.0.

But, now, ISO 10646 is just as bad as Unicode.

> > So, please don't say "international" when what you mean is merely
> > "intereuropean".
> At least the voting is, isn't it.
> Note that some even go for the bet of calling such a code "universal" :-)
Isn't it the Martian way?

                                MO