Re: East vs West (was Re: NULL)

> I understand that ISO 10646 (the ISO version of Unicode, to over-simplify:
> it's compatible) has been passed as a JIS standard, JIS 221, and also
> as GB13000 in China.
JIS committee voted "no" to 10646.

It makes it as JIS only because it is ISO and added some explanation that
it is one of a character set used to represent Japanese single lingual,
not multi-lingual, text.

> So there is at least some Asian support for it.
Sure. There are a lot more international support for X.400.

                                                        Masataka Ohta