At 01:46 PM 1/4/99 -0800, Ned Freed wrote:
I completely agree, which is why I suggested a parameter to message/rfc822
as the solution. We certainly do not want to define a flotilla of new
composite subtypes to cover all these cases.
(my suggested passed yours in the mail.)
parameter sounds dandy.
d/
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Dave Crocker Tel: +60 (19) 3299 445
<mailto:dcrocker(_at_)brandenburg(_dot_)com> Post Office Box 296,
U.P.M.
Serdang, Selangor 43400 MALAYSIA
Brandenburg Consulting
<http://www.brandenburg.com> Tel: +1 (408) 246 8253
Fax: +1(408)273 6464 675 Spruce Dr., Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA